Rhoades

Members
  • Posts

    120
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from SilentOne in Encouraging Temple recommend renewals?   
    @NeedleinA  This is late, but my area (in the South) also had a significant number of members choosing to not renew recommends.  Executive secretaries and ward clerks sent reminders and tried to schedule appointments and a surprising (to me) number of people still chose not to renew their recommends.
    As I browsed through this thread I didn't notice any mention of Elder Rasband's Oct 2020 general conference talk, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2020/10/16rasband?lang=eng.  He said:
    He also reminded us of Howard W. Hunter teaching that we should hold and be worthy of a recommend even if we don't have access to a temple.  He shared:
     
    Aside from reminding members and trying to schedule appointments, another approach we took was to remind them of the Lord's teachings using this talk by Elder Rasband.  But I'm not sure it had much affect.
  2. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from NeuroTypical in Encouraging Temple recommend renewals?   
    I've been interviewed dozens of times and in many places, and I've never heard of an interviewer doing this.  That's weird.  And in my mind, it's out of line.  The handbook (section 25.1.1) says:
     
  3. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from scottyg in Encouraging Temple recommend renewals?   
    I've been interviewed dozens of times and in many places, and I've never heard of an interviewer doing this.  That's weird.  And in my mind, it's out of line.  The handbook (section 25.1.1) says:
     
  4. Love
    Rhoades got a reaction from scottyg in Encouraging Temple recommend renewals?   
    @NeedleinA  This is late, but my area (in the South) also had a significant number of members choosing to not renew recommends.  Executive secretaries and ward clerks sent reminders and tried to schedule appointments and a surprising (to me) number of people still chose not to renew their recommends.
    As I browsed through this thread I didn't notice any mention of Elder Rasband's Oct 2020 general conference talk, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2020/10/16rasband?lang=eng.  He said:
    He also reminded us of Howard W. Hunter teaching that we should hold and be worthy of a recommend even if we don't have access to a temple.  He shared:
     
    Aside from reminding members and trying to schedule appointments, another approach we took was to remind them of the Lord's teachings using this talk by Elder Rasband.  But I'm not sure it had much affect.
  5. Thanks
    Rhoades got a reaction from NeedleinA in Encouraging Temple recommend renewals?   
    @NeedleinA  This is late, but my area (in the South) also had a significant number of members choosing to not renew recommends.  Executive secretaries and ward clerks sent reminders and tried to schedule appointments and a surprising (to me) number of people still chose not to renew their recommends.
    As I browsed through this thread I didn't notice any mention of Elder Rasband's Oct 2020 general conference talk, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2020/10/16rasband?lang=eng.  He said:
    He also reminded us of Howard W. Hunter teaching that we should hold and be worthy of a recommend even if we don't have access to a temple.  He shared:
     
    Aside from reminding members and trying to schedule appointments, another approach we took was to remind them of the Lord's teachings using this talk by Elder Rasband.  But I'm not sure it had much affect.
  6. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from Lost Boy in Is Israel on your bucket list?   
    On my second trip there I rented a car.  You don't need (or want) one while visiting things in Jerusalem; just use taxis.  I used the rental car for day trips to remote sites (e.g. Nazareth, Mt. Tabor, Galilee and surrounding sites, both Jordan River sites, the Dead Sea, Masada, Qumran caves, etc.).  Renting a car allowed me to do and see a lot more in less days, and for less money.  I felt confident doing things on my own and renting a car since I'd been there before.
    For someone that's never been there before and doesn't want the pricey cost of a fully arranged multi-day tour, I'd suggest arranging your own flight to Israel, take a sherut (a shared taxi minivan/small bus that's cheap) to Jerusalem, and schedule a few day trips with Israeli tour companies for the first part of your trip.  They'll pick you up at your hotel and take you back at the end.  You could take day trips to cover Bethlehem (cant' drive rental car there anyway), Dead Sea, Nazareth, Galilee, Jerusalem, etc.  Then, leave a few extra days to see more of Jerusalem on your own that your guided day tour didn't cover.  You can take a sherut back to the airport (you call ahead to arrange it and they pick you up at hotel).
    Things a guided Jerusalem day tour might not cover yet you should see include the Garden Tomb, Gethsemane, going up on the temple mount, City of David and Hezekiah's tunnel, Pool of Bethesda, and western wall excavations site.  (Schedule the City of David tour through their website beforehand, no need for a third party tour group. This was a favorite.  At the end of the tunnel you end up at the Pool of Siloam where Jesus sent the man born blind in John 9.  There are other tours you can schedule, like western wall tunnels, but I liked City of David best.)
    If you're more adventurous, you could take some guided day tours on the front end of your trip, and then see Jerusalem some more on your own, and then rent a car for the last few days to see remote things you didn't use a tour group for.
  7. Thanks
    Rhoades got a reaction from john4truth in Qualifications of a Bishop   
    I have a friend who served as a Bishop and then as a counselor in our stake presidency who had been divorced.
    I know of a stake president (my brother's stake) who had been divorced.
     
  8. Like
    Rhoades reacted to Traveler in Is Israel on your bucket list?   
    I made a trip to Israel last year (about this time).  I thought it would be a semi-interesting experience.   I did not think the trip to be all that important (for anyone).  I found the experience much more than I ever dreamed.  Like @Jane_Doe – I thought the trip would be somewhat of a farce.  I was aware that Constantine sent his mother to Jerusalem to determine where important Christian events took place.  It was obvious that her trip was more political than rational.  Instead she picked the prominent Pagan shrines and declared them sacred Christian holy places.  
    We should also remember that in 73 AD. the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and plowed the ground so that one stone did not remain on top of another – all that was left was below ground foundations and previously berried structures.  Anciently it was very common to build new over the foundations of the old.  What is there today are things built after the Roman destruction.  The oldest stuff is Pagan – followed by some some early Christian modifications – along with stuff from various conquerors down to our present day.
    For me some of the highlights:
    #1. Seeing Israel for myself and realizing that all the pictures and other references I thought I understood were so very different from the “truth” of being there.
    #2. Immersing myself in the geology of the past.  For example, I was taught in my youth the expert art of using a sling (not the twirling around thing but the rapid set and release used in ancient combat).  I took the opportunity to enter the same valley in which David met against Goliath, picked some perfect stones from the same dry river bed where David picked his stones and slung 5 stones at a target about 75 yards away. 
    I also visited near the place where Jesus was baptized.  It could not be the same spot because the Jordan river is smaller than the Jordan river in Utah and wanders (changing it wandering path yearly) to the Dead Sea.  But realizing that where Jesus was baptized was in the same area-place where Joshua (The Hebrew name of Jesus) brought the “children” of Israel and where he (Joshua) took them into the Jordan River to be cleansed (baptized) before entering the “promised land”.
    So many times, I was touched by the spirit in ways and for things I did not at all expect.  Perhaps the most profound was Gethsemane (not the traditional place near the bottom of the mount of Olives but the place a Latter-day Prophet testified was near where Jesus prayed and took upon him the burden of our sins.
    #3.  Talking to Jews in Jerusalem – participating in a bar mitzvah at the western wall.
    #4.  Talking to Muslims that have lived in Palestine for many generations.
    #5. Learning why it is impossible to purchase a cheeseburger in Israel.
    #6. Eating traditional foods (both Islamic and Jewish)
    #7. Spending a Sabbath (Saturday) in Israel.
    #8. Meeting with the Latter-day Saints that live in Israel.
    #9 Ridding on a modern boat of ancient design on Galilee (which is not a sea but a lake about the size of Bear lake in Utah and Idaho.)  I also ate a fish caught in Galilee and prepared in the ancient style (likely like the fish that fed the 5,000).
    All in all – my trip was much more and many times over what I expected – Spiritually far more that I could have dreamed.  I would return again and plan to return – I am not so concerned about safety.   I believe I am much safer now than Jesus or the apostles ever were in Jerusalem.
     
    The Traveler
  9. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from eVa in Creation and Garden Story: Instructional Value?   
    - It also teaches why mortality and its problems are necessary and ultimately good for us.
    - It also teaches about work.  I heard the story dozens of times before it became significant to me that there was work done by Adam and Eve in the garden BEFORE the fall.
    - We're also taught the importance of marriage and staying by your partner's side when tough times hit.  This is very important, yet I didn't consider the Garden and Fall story a marriage sermon for quite a long time.  I do now, every time I hear it.
    Being able to add additional bullet points with new truths isn't the only wonderful thing about studying the story repetitively.  My actual level of understanding of fundamental truths has deepened significantly.  Gaining a correct and deep understanding of doctrine is very powerful.
  10. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from zil in THE OTHER SHEEP   
    The "millions" I was talking about are different.  A spiritual gathering of Israel and their conversion to Christ is happening now.  Jews frequently know they are of Judah, but people of other tribes typically don't know their lineage.  Lots of people throughout the world are actually descendants of various tribes of Israel (though they don't know it).  For example, lots of people in the Americas (north and south) are descendants of Israel's son Joseph through Joseph's sons Ephraim and Manasseh.
    In Genesis 29:22 Joseph was blessed, "Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall".  He was "fruitful" because he would have a large posterity.  And those branches that were by the water and went over the wall include descendants that went across the ocean to the Americas.  One couldn't figure that out from that verse alone, but the Book of Mormon helps make it more clear.  The Book of Mormon teaches that it is a record of some of Joseph's descendants. 
    Book of Mormon prophets also taught that their descendants would eventually reject the gospel of Jesus Christ.  They knew people from gentile nations across the ocean (i.e. Europe) would come to this land (Americas) and bring the Bible to their posterity and reintroduce Christianity to them.  Their record (Book of Mormon) after being buried for many years would come forth to show their posterity that they are actually of the house of Israel and help convert them to Christ.  The title page of the Book of Mormon says it was "written to the Lamanites, who are a remnant of the house of Israel; and also to Jew and Gentile" and one of its purposes is "to show unto the remnant of the house of Israel what great things the Lord hath done for their fathers; and that they may know the covenants of the Lord, that they are not cast off forever".
    Also worth mentioning is that the Judah and Joseph writings mentioned in Ezekial 37:16-19 (https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/ezek/37.16-19#p14) that would be separate and then joined together are the Bible and Book of Mormon.
  11. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from zil in THE OTHER SHEEP   
    Larry,
    Sorry I haven't checked back in a while.  It looks like others are providing answers.  I did come across an interesting magazine article about the 70AD destruction and Matthew 24 which you might find interesting:  https://www.lds.org/ensign/1989/06/be-ye-also-ready-the-amazing-christian-escape-from-the-a-d-70-destruction-of-jerusalem?lang=eng
    BTW - I did do research on Caiaphas's death and he would have been 87 at the start of the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple if he was alive.  I think I'd actually read that before but had forgotten.
    We aren't bothered by any scriptures with phrases like "this generation" or "last days" or whatever because there are explanations for different interpretations.  Even in mainstream Christianity you can find reasonable explanations (which I'm guessing you've read) to counter Preterism.
    Earlier you were asking about how the world would pass away, because a translation of "end of age" could be applied to Matthew 24.  Yes, there was an "end of age" to the Jews in AD 70.  We can learn about it and marvel that Jesus warned them.  But, that doesn't preclude there being a Second Coming in the future.   I shared 2 Peter 3:10.  https://www.lds.org/scriptures/nt/2-pet/3.10-13?lang=eng#p9 which I think speaks to a different end that is yet to happen.  The earth will be burned along with the wicked, and a changed earth (so, in a sense "new") will be for the righteous.  This didn't happen at 70 AD.  Another scripture that supports this is Isaiah 51: 6 https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/isa/51.6?lang=eng#p5  That chapter prophesies of still other things that are yet to happen.  Although there was destruction in 70AD, the earth wasn't totally burned and changed along with the destruction of all the wicked.  See also Psalm 102:25-26 https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/ps/102.25-26?lang=eng#p24   And, see in that same chapter vs 15-16 which will happen in the future.  Looking at more than Matthew 24 I think there's a good amount of evidence of a future Second Coming and a different kind of end.
    There just seem to be so many Biblical prophecies related to the Second Coming that were not complete by 70AD, such as the great apostasy and restoration, the coming forth of the Book of Mormon which would start the restoration, the gospel being preached in all the world, the millennial reign of Jesus Christ in which there will be established a political (in addition to religious) Kingdom of God, the binding of Satan during the millennium, the millennial transformation of the Earth in which there will be great physical changes and the nature of animals changed, the Dead Sea being changed, two prophets working miracles in Jerusalem for 3.5 years before being killed then raised from the dead 3.5 days later, the gathering of Israel and restoring them to a knowledge of Christ, the deliverance of the Jews and Jesus showing them the nail prints in his hands, the dividing of sheep and goats via resurrection and judgement and the destruction of the wicked by fire, the return of Elijah and the welding between fathers and children, and so on.
    However, the Biblical prophecies are not the complete basis for my understanding.  Additional scripture (Book of Mormon, D&C, and words of modern prophets) further support that there is a Second Coming of Christ yet in the future.   @Carborendum 's reply reminded me of Jacob 5 in the Book of Mormon (because it seems confusing at first) which gives an allegory about the history, scattering, and gathering of Israel.  It wasn't all done by 70AD.  The book of 4 Nephi covers the time period that includes 70AD and it makes no mention of the Second Coming happening.  And, there are later prophesies written in the Book of Mormon between 350AD and 400AD about the gathering of Israel and the restoring them to a knowledge of Christ in the future (Such as Mormon chapters 3 & 5).  The coming forth of the Book of Mormon and conversion of millions of people in fulfillment of these prophecies, along with like prophecies in the Bible, support the notion of a great restoration of the house of Israel preceding the Second Coming.
    The D&C states even more directly that the second coming is in the future.
    https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/29.11?lang=eng#p10
    https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/34.6?lang=eng#p5
     
    The other question worth asking is why do we trust Book of Mormon, D&C, or modern prophets' words in addition to the Bible about "other sheep" or Matthew 24 or other topics?  The reason is a witness by the Spirit that the Book of Mormon is the word of God.  Since God has told me the Book of Mormon is true, I rely on these resources.  My belief and confidence in the Bible is also strengthened from knowing the Book of Mormon is true.
    Note however that I do acknowledge that my understanding of the word of God through them is not totally complete and perfect.  But, that's on me.
  12. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from Sunday21 in Tanning   
    Perhaps she has a less cautious personality and you're more careful.  Even if she stopped tanning you'll be tempted to be annoyed at other decisions and patterns over the years.  People are different and it takes maturity and some growth to learn to get along with and love your spouse.
    Ask yourself these questions. Why is she tanning?  Why does tanning bother you?  Is it that she's doing something dangerous and reckless (and you love her so this bothers you)?  Or is it because you don't want to be stuck with a cancerous wife in X years?  Are you personally ready for a commitment to love and support her through severe trials whatever they may be?
    There's some good advice in a verse that stood out to me recently.  1 Nephi 15:11 says, "Do ye not remember the things which the Lord hath said?—If ye will not harden your hearts, and ask me in faith, believing that ye shall receive, with diligence in keeping my commandments, surely these things shall be made known unto you."
    What caught my attention recently is the phrase "with diligence in keeping my commandments".  I think that very much applies to someone approaching marriage.  The more you're living right, the more you'll A) be prepared for marriage and B) be able to receive divine guidance to navigate your situation.
  13. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from wenglund in Creation and Garden Story: Instructional Value?   
    - It also teaches why mortality and its problems are necessary and ultimately good for us.
    - It also teaches about work.  I heard the story dozens of times before it became significant to me that there was work done by Adam and Eve in the garden BEFORE the fall.
    - We're also taught the importance of marriage and staying by your partner's side when tough times hit.  This is very important, yet I didn't consider the Garden and Fall story a marriage sermon for quite a long time.  I do now, every time I hear it.
    Being able to add additional bullet points with new truths isn't the only wonderful thing about studying the story repetitively.  My actual level of understanding of fundamental truths has deepened significantly.  Gaining a correct and deep understanding of doctrine is very powerful.
  14. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from zil in THE OTHER SHEEP   
    There was more than one question asked and the response covers more than one context.  The destruction of the temple, and second coming.
    " A few days later Jesus (at His trial) said the High Priest & the Sanhedrin, "shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming on the clouds of heaven" (Matt. 26:64) Josephus, Tacitus, Eusebius and the Talmud all record the FACT that God's presence was perceived at that awesome destruction. They even record that angelic armies were seen in the clouds."
    I wouldn't be surprised if God's presence and an angelic presence was manifested at that destruction.  However, there is still yet to come the big "Second Coming" event.  Just because something fulfills prophesy and foreshadows something else to come, doesn't mean that the something else won't come.  More than one fulfillment of prophesy is common.
    "Matthew 26:64 Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." NKJV  How did these men witness that event"
    Good question.  They might have witnessed the event that happened at 70 AD (I'm not sure, and you've given me something new to study later.  I'm curious if there's any information on whether this high priest was still around at 70 AD which would make him old but it's possible).  However, whether or not they were still alive in 70 AD, they can still witness the other big event called the second coming.  Death is not the end of existence.  Consider Job who said "25 For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth: 26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God" (Job 19:25-26)  If Job, who lived long  before Jesus's time can be resurrected and see Jesus stand at the latter day upon the earth, then it's possible for New Testament people to see it too.
    Now, concerning Matthew 16:28 "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom."  This is talking about John.  Jesus told him he wouldn't face death until after the second coming.  In John 21:22-23 speaking to Peter about John, Jesus says, "22 Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me. 23 Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?"
    John stayed around long enough to see Jesus resurrected, and to see the destruction near 70 AD, and he's still around today, and he'll be around at the Second Coming.  The other Apostles interpreted whatever Jesus said as though John wouldn't die because a person can't normally live so long.  It seems you have interpreted it to mean it would happen sooner rather than later during a normal person's life span.  However, through modern revelation we've learned John is a "translated being" and his body has undergone a change to allow it to not die yet.  (More info on translated beings at https://www.lds.org/scriptures/gs/translated-beings?lang=eng)
     
    Some other points about the Second Coming are:
    1)  It will be a big event that everyone will see.  It won't be just the Jews.  Revelation 1:1 "Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen."  In Matthew 24:30 it says "then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory."  The event in 70 AD was big, but it isn't as big as this will be.  Everyone will see it.  When he comes it will be a worldwide appearance like the sun coming from east to west.  Matthew 24: 27 "For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be."
    2) The earth will undergo a drastic change.  Fire is often mentioned and elements melting (maybe something like nuclear fission?).  I mentioned 2 Peter 3:10 earlier. 
    3) Christ will judge, and the wicked will be separated from the righteous at the second coming.  See Matthew 25:31-31 "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:  32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats".  There's also scripture about the wicked being burned and destroyed, see Malachi 4:1, and Malachi 3:1-5.  And, the ones mentioned in my earlier post in Mark 13 and Matthew 13.  This isn't a limited judgment or limited destruction like in 70AD.  This is bigger.  A part of this judgment and separation is that the righteous who have already died will be resurrected (if they haven't already been resurrected like those in Matthew 27:52-53), and the wicked will remain dead.  Revelation 20:4-5 "4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.  5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection."
    4) The Second Coming will usher in the thousand year reign of Christ.  The thousand years was mentioned in Revelation 20.  In D&C 29:11 it says, "For I will reveal myself from heaven with power and great glory, with all the hosts thereof, and dwell in righteousness with men on earth a thousand years, and the wicked shall not stand."
    5) A great apostacy would precede the Second Coming (2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 ) "1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, 2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. 3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;"  He's saying don't be troubled by when Christ will come, because there's going to be a falling away, or apostacy, first.  This has happened.
    6) There will be a Restoration before the Second Coming.  Acts 3:20-21 "20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: 21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began."  Jesus's appearance to Joseph Smith fulfilled this prophesy about Jesus coming back at the times of restitution (or restoration).  This appearance started the restoration, but it wasn't the big Second Coming event.  There certainly was no restitution of all things starting at 70AD.
    7) Elijah would come before the Second Coming.  Malachi 4:5-6 "Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord: 6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse."  This has already happened.  See D&C 110 (https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/110.13-16)
     
    i could probably come up with more, but 7 seems like a good number to end on.
     
     
     
  15. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from wenglund in THE OTHER SHEEP   
    There was more than one question asked and the response covers more than one context.  The destruction of the temple, and second coming.
    " A few days later Jesus (at His trial) said the High Priest & the Sanhedrin, "shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming on the clouds of heaven" (Matt. 26:64) Josephus, Tacitus, Eusebius and the Talmud all record the FACT that God's presence was perceived at that awesome destruction. They even record that angelic armies were seen in the clouds."
    I wouldn't be surprised if God's presence and an angelic presence was manifested at that destruction.  However, there is still yet to come the big "Second Coming" event.  Just because something fulfills prophesy and foreshadows something else to come, doesn't mean that the something else won't come.  More than one fulfillment of prophesy is common.
    "Matthew 26:64 Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." NKJV  How did these men witness that event"
    Good question.  They might have witnessed the event that happened at 70 AD (I'm not sure, and you've given me something new to study later.  I'm curious if there's any information on whether this high priest was still around at 70 AD which would make him old but it's possible).  However, whether or not they were still alive in 70 AD, they can still witness the other big event called the second coming.  Death is not the end of existence.  Consider Job who said "25 For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth: 26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God" (Job 19:25-26)  If Job, who lived long  before Jesus's time can be resurrected and see Jesus stand at the latter day upon the earth, then it's possible for New Testament people to see it too.
    Now, concerning Matthew 16:28 "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom."  This is talking about John.  Jesus told him he wouldn't face death until after the second coming.  In John 21:22-23 speaking to Peter about John, Jesus says, "22 Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me. 23 Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?"
    John stayed around long enough to see Jesus resurrected, and to see the destruction near 70 AD, and he's still around today, and he'll be around at the Second Coming.  The other Apostles interpreted whatever Jesus said as though John wouldn't die because a person can't normally live so long.  It seems you have interpreted it to mean it would happen sooner rather than later during a normal person's life span.  However, through modern revelation we've learned John is a "translated being" and his body has undergone a change to allow it to not die yet.  (More info on translated beings at https://www.lds.org/scriptures/gs/translated-beings?lang=eng)
     
    Some other points about the Second Coming are:
    1)  It will be a big event that everyone will see.  It won't be just the Jews.  Revelation 1:1 "Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen."  In Matthew 24:30 it says "then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory."  The event in 70 AD was big, but it isn't as big as this will be.  Everyone will see it.  When he comes it will be a worldwide appearance like the sun coming from east to west.  Matthew 24: 27 "For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be."
    2) The earth will undergo a drastic change.  Fire is often mentioned and elements melting (maybe something like nuclear fission?).  I mentioned 2 Peter 3:10 earlier. 
    3) Christ will judge, and the wicked will be separated from the righteous at the second coming.  See Matthew 25:31-31 "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:  32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats".  There's also scripture about the wicked being burned and destroyed, see Malachi 4:1, and Malachi 3:1-5.  And, the ones mentioned in my earlier post in Mark 13 and Matthew 13.  This isn't a limited judgment or limited destruction like in 70AD.  This is bigger.  A part of this judgment and separation is that the righteous who have already died will be resurrected (if they haven't already been resurrected like those in Matthew 27:52-53), and the wicked will remain dead.  Revelation 20:4-5 "4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.  5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection."
    4) The Second Coming will usher in the thousand year reign of Christ.  The thousand years was mentioned in Revelation 20.  In D&C 29:11 it says, "For I will reveal myself from heaven with power and great glory, with all the hosts thereof, and dwell in righteousness with men on earth a thousand years, and the wicked shall not stand."
    5) A great apostacy would precede the Second Coming (2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 ) "1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, 2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. 3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;"  He's saying don't be troubled by when Christ will come, because there's going to be a falling away, or apostacy, first.  This has happened.
    6) There will be a Restoration before the Second Coming.  Acts 3:20-21 "20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: 21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began."  Jesus's appearance to Joseph Smith fulfilled this prophesy about Jesus coming back at the times of restitution (or restoration).  This appearance started the restoration, but it wasn't the big Second Coming event.  There certainly was no restitution of all things starting at 70AD.
    7) Elijah would come before the Second Coming.  Malachi 4:5-6 "Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord: 6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse."  This has already happened.  See D&C 110 (https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/110.13-16)
     
    i could probably come up with more, but 7 seems like a good number to end on.
     
     
     
  16. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from zil in Tanning   
    Perhaps she has a less cautious personality and you're more careful.  Even if she stopped tanning you'll be tempted to be annoyed at other decisions and patterns over the years.  People are different and it takes maturity and some growth to learn to get along with and love your spouse.
    Ask yourself these questions. Why is she tanning?  Why does tanning bother you?  Is it that she's doing something dangerous and reckless (and you love her so this bothers you)?  Or is it because you don't want to be stuck with a cancerous wife in X years?  Are you personally ready for a commitment to love and support her through severe trials whatever they may be?
    There's some good advice in a verse that stood out to me recently.  1 Nephi 15:11 says, "Do ye not remember the things which the Lord hath said?—If ye will not harden your hearts, and ask me in faith, believing that ye shall receive, with diligence in keeping my commandments, surely these things shall be made known unto you."
    What caught my attention recently is the phrase "with diligence in keeping my commandments".  I think that very much applies to someone approaching marriage.  The more you're living right, the more you'll A) be prepared for marriage and B) be able to receive divine guidance to navigate your situation.
  17. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from zil in THE OTHER SHEEP   
    Welcome, Larry.  I haven't been to this site in quite some time, but I wanted to reply to you.
    Absolutely, it's a good thing.  Stick with it and you'll find answers.  Some answers come early on and some over time.  And it's a process.  Learning will undoubtedly lead to more questions, and if you pursue it those questions will lead to more learning, which will lead to questions,  etc. 
    Yep!
     
    After condemning the wickedness in Jerusalem in chapter 23 and describing some of what awaits them, in 24 Jesus tells of the destruction of the temple.  And, then his disciples ask those questions in verse 3 ,"Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the END OF THE AGE?"
    The disciples are asking multiple questions about things that will happen in multiple time periods.  They probably figured the second coming and the destruction of Jerusalem and temple would be relatively closer in time.  Jesus's reply includes some events that would happen anciently, some to happen later, and some were of dual nature (kind of like parts of Isaiah) that have fulfillment both anciently and in the last days.
  18. Like
    Rhoades reacted to Vort in LDS Perspectives: Depression and Mental Health Myths   
    Why do you think it has to be either/or, Jojo? Spiritual sickness can manifest itself in our physical bodies, so why not our minds? On the other hand, we can have physical illness that has no spiritual component to it, so why should the same not hold true with some mental and psychological infirmities? Our flesh-and-blood brains are the framework through which we perceive and think about our lives, and I am sure that flesh and blood is just as prone to weakness and disease as our arms, legs, stomachs, or any other part of our bodies.
  19. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from a mustard seed in LDS Perspectives: Depression and Mental Health Myths   
    It would be best to read the whole thing, but I'll paste some quotes from a talk by Elder Oaks that address this  (https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2010/04/healing-the-sick?lang=eng).
     
    Latter-day Saints believe in applying the best available scientific knowledge and techniques. We use nutrition, exercise, and other practices to preserve health, and we enlist the help of healing practitioners, such as physicians and surgeons, to restore health.
    The use of medical science is not at odds with our prayers of faith and our reliance on priesthood blessings. When a person requested a priesthood blessing, Brigham Young would ask, “Have you used any remedies?” To those who said no because “we wish the Elders to lay hands upon us, and we have faith that we shall be healed,” President Young replied: “That is very inconsistent according to my faith. If we are sick, and ask the Lord to heal us, and to do all for us that is necessary to be done, according to my understanding of the Gospel of salvation, I might as well ask the Lord to cause my wheat and corn to grow, without my plowing the ground and casting in the seed. It appears consistent to me to apply every remedy that comes within the range of my knowledge, and [then] to ask my Father in Heaven … to sanctify that application to the healing of my body.”
     
    In a notable talk on administering to the sick, President Spencer W. Kimball said: “The need of faith is often underestimated. The ill one and the family often seem to depend wholly on the power of the priesthood and the gift of healing that they hope the administering brethren may have, whereas the greater responsibility is with him who is blessed. … The major element is the faith of the individual when that person is conscious and accountable. ‘Thy faith hath made thee whole’ [Matthew 9:22] was repeated so often by the Master that it almost became a chorus.”
     
    Young men and older men, please take special note of what I will say now. As we exercise the undoubted power of the priesthood of God and as we treasure His promise that He will hear and answer the prayer of faith, we must always remember that faith and the healing power of the priesthood cannot produce a result contrary to the will of Him whose priesthood it is. This principle is taught in the revelation directing that the elders of the Church shall lay their hands upon the sick. The Lord’s promise is that “he that hath faith in me to be healed, and is not appointed unto death, shall be healed” (D&C 42:48; emphasis added). Similarly, in another modern revelation the Lord declares that when one “asketh according to the will of God … it is done even as he asketh” (D&C 46:30).
    From all of this we learn that even the servants of the Lord, exercising His divine power in a circumstance where there is sufficient faith to be healed, cannot give a priesthood blessing that will cause a person to be healed if that healing is not the will of the Lord.
    As children of God, knowing of His great love and His ultimate knowledge of what is best for our eternal welfare, we trust in Him. The first principle of the gospel is faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, and faith means trust. 
  20. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from Just_A_Guy in Temple Workers   
    Have you thought about traveling to another temple where you don't know the workers?  Being in UT probably gives you that luxury.
     
    I'm reminded of a story my seminary teacher told me years and years ago.  This seminary teacher became my stake president about 10 years after telling this story.  He was in a meeting where a new priesthood leader was being sustained and he knew the guy had been involved in bad stuff.  (He didn't share details with us.)  He wasn't sure what to do, but he ended up raising his hand to oppose the sustaining.  After the meeting was over, the leaders talked to him about it.  I can't remember what all he taught us via this story, but there are times to speak up.  Having an "accuser" is sometimes part of what helps sinners repent and helps to keep the integrity of the Church (see D&C 102).  My teacher wasn't an evil guy for providing information about what he knew.  He was one of the nicest guys I've ever known.
    I would consider counseling with your stake president about the matter.
  21. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from NeuroTypical in LDS Perspectives: Depression and Mental Health Myths   
    It would be best to read the whole thing, but I'll paste some quotes from a talk by Elder Oaks that address this  (https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2010/04/healing-the-sick?lang=eng).
     
    Latter-day Saints believe in applying the best available scientific knowledge and techniques. We use nutrition, exercise, and other practices to preserve health, and we enlist the help of healing practitioners, such as physicians and surgeons, to restore health.
    The use of medical science is not at odds with our prayers of faith and our reliance on priesthood blessings. When a person requested a priesthood blessing, Brigham Young would ask, “Have you used any remedies?” To those who said no because “we wish the Elders to lay hands upon us, and we have faith that we shall be healed,” President Young replied: “That is very inconsistent according to my faith. If we are sick, and ask the Lord to heal us, and to do all for us that is necessary to be done, according to my understanding of the Gospel of salvation, I might as well ask the Lord to cause my wheat and corn to grow, without my plowing the ground and casting in the seed. It appears consistent to me to apply every remedy that comes within the range of my knowledge, and [then] to ask my Father in Heaven … to sanctify that application to the healing of my body.”
     
    In a notable talk on administering to the sick, President Spencer W. Kimball said: “The need of faith is often underestimated. The ill one and the family often seem to depend wholly on the power of the priesthood and the gift of healing that they hope the administering brethren may have, whereas the greater responsibility is with him who is blessed. … The major element is the faith of the individual when that person is conscious and accountable. ‘Thy faith hath made thee whole’ [Matthew 9:22] was repeated so often by the Master that it almost became a chorus.”
     
    Young men and older men, please take special note of what I will say now. As we exercise the undoubted power of the priesthood of God and as we treasure His promise that He will hear and answer the prayer of faith, we must always remember that faith and the healing power of the priesthood cannot produce a result contrary to the will of Him whose priesthood it is. This principle is taught in the revelation directing that the elders of the Church shall lay their hands upon the sick. The Lord’s promise is that “he that hath faith in me to be healed, and is not appointed unto death, shall be healed” (D&C 42:48; emphasis added). Similarly, in another modern revelation the Lord declares that when one “asketh according to the will of God … it is done even as he asketh” (D&C 46:30).
    From all of this we learn that even the servants of the Lord, exercising His divine power in a circumstance where there is sufficient faith to be healed, cannot give a priesthood blessing that will cause a person to be healed if that healing is not the will of the Lord.
    As children of God, knowing of His great love and His ultimate knowledge of what is best for our eternal welfare, we trust in Him. The first principle of the gospel is faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, and faith means trust. 
  22. Like
    Rhoades reacted to Vort in Skipping Elders Quorum   
    I vote for staying and making it better. The new EQP and his counselors need your support, apparently much more than the old ones did.
    Ask not what your EQ can do for you; ask what you can do for your EQ.
  23. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from prisonchaplain in LDS Perspectives: Depression and Mental Health Myths   
    It would be best to read the whole thing, but I'll paste some quotes from a talk by Elder Oaks that address this  (https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2010/04/healing-the-sick?lang=eng).
     
    Latter-day Saints believe in applying the best available scientific knowledge and techniques. We use nutrition, exercise, and other practices to preserve health, and we enlist the help of healing practitioners, such as physicians and surgeons, to restore health.
    The use of medical science is not at odds with our prayers of faith and our reliance on priesthood blessings. When a person requested a priesthood blessing, Brigham Young would ask, “Have you used any remedies?” To those who said no because “we wish the Elders to lay hands upon us, and we have faith that we shall be healed,” President Young replied: “That is very inconsistent according to my faith. If we are sick, and ask the Lord to heal us, and to do all for us that is necessary to be done, according to my understanding of the Gospel of salvation, I might as well ask the Lord to cause my wheat and corn to grow, without my plowing the ground and casting in the seed. It appears consistent to me to apply every remedy that comes within the range of my knowledge, and [then] to ask my Father in Heaven … to sanctify that application to the healing of my body.”
     
    In a notable talk on administering to the sick, President Spencer W. Kimball said: “The need of faith is often underestimated. The ill one and the family often seem to depend wholly on the power of the priesthood and the gift of healing that they hope the administering brethren may have, whereas the greater responsibility is with him who is blessed. … The major element is the faith of the individual when that person is conscious and accountable. ‘Thy faith hath made thee whole’ [Matthew 9:22] was repeated so often by the Master that it almost became a chorus.”
     
    Young men and older men, please take special note of what I will say now. As we exercise the undoubted power of the priesthood of God and as we treasure His promise that He will hear and answer the prayer of faith, we must always remember that faith and the healing power of the priesthood cannot produce a result contrary to the will of Him whose priesthood it is. This principle is taught in the revelation directing that the elders of the Church shall lay their hands upon the sick. The Lord’s promise is that “he that hath faith in me to be healed, and is not appointed unto death, shall be healed” (D&C 42:48; emphasis added). Similarly, in another modern revelation the Lord declares that when one “asketh according to the will of God … it is done even as he asketh” (D&C 46:30).
    From all of this we learn that even the servants of the Lord, exercising His divine power in a circumstance where there is sufficient faith to be healed, cannot give a priesthood blessing that will cause a person to be healed if that healing is not the will of the Lord.
    As children of God, knowing of His great love and His ultimate knowledge of what is best for our eternal welfare, we trust in Him. The first principle of the gospel is faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, and faith means trust. 
  24. Like
    Rhoades got a reaction from Blackmarch in Romans 3:23-28   
    I love that scripture!
    Lest anyone think I am ignoring the rest of God's word (Rev 22:19), I am well aware that faith and works go together (John 14:12, Hebrews 11:6, and of course James 2, and even the last verse in Romans 3, etc.).  I also know that justification is not just from my faith; the most important part is Jesus -- we are "justified by his blood" (Romans 5:9).
    Some other scriptures I love about the goodness of Jesus and my dependence on Him:
    "I glory in plainness; I glory in truth; I glory in my Jesus, for he hath redeemed my soul from hell." (2 Nephi 33:6)
    "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them." (Ephesians 2:8-10)
    "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature:old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." (2 Corinthians 5;17)
    "But Ammon said unto him: I do not boast in my own strength, nor in my own wisdom; but behold, my joy is full, yea, my heart is brim with joy, and I will rejoice in my God.  Yea, I know that I am nothing; as to my strength I am weak; therefore I will not boast of myself, but I will boast of my God, for in his strength I can do all things; yea, behold, many mighty miracles we have wrought in this land, for which we will praise his name forever. . . .  Therefore, let us glory, yea, we will glory in the Lord; yea, we will rejoice, for our joy is full; yea, we will praise our God forever. Behold, who can glory too much in the Lord? Yea, who can say too much of his great power, and of his mercy, and of his long-suffering towards the children of men? Behold, I say unto you, I cannot say the smallest part which I feel." (Alma 26 11-12, 16)
    "And when I desire to rejoice, my heart groaneth because of my sins; nevertheless, I know in whom I have trusted.  My God hath been my support; he hath led me through mine afflictions...; and he hath preserved me...  He hath filled me with his love" ( 2 Nephi 4:19-21)
    "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.  I am that bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead. This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die." (John 6:47-50)
    "And moreover, I say unto you, that there shall be no other name given nor any other way nor means whereby salvation can come unto the children of men, only in and through the name of Christ, the Lord Omnipotent" (Mosiah 3:17)
     
    I could go on and on with scriptures that remind me of how great God is.
     
  25. Like
    Rhoades reacted to Just_A_Guy in The baptism of Jesus   
    My understanding is that John the Baptist was basically taking the existing Jewish custom of ritual baths, or mikvot, and attaching a new (to the Jews) theological significance to it.  I think it's fair to assume that as a Jew Jesus participated many mikvot in His youth.  But part of John the Baptist's preparatory role was to teach mikvot/baptism as something that was done in remission of sins and as a harbinger for the impending Kingdom of God.  Once John had restored this truth, it was appropriate for Jesus to receive baptism at his hands--as @Larry Cotrell says, primarily as an example rather than because He Himself had sins in need of remission.