Thank you all! I am glad to have found an active forum with many sincere thinkers are coming to share their ideas. Some follow-up comments and more questions: v.10: My question is more about the context. The sentence reads: "Wherefore, the ends of the law which the Holy One hath given, unto the inflicting of the punishment which is affixed, which punishment that is affixed is in opposition to that of the happiness which is affixed, to answer the ends of the atonement--For it must needs be, that there is an opposition in all things. So what does answering the ends of the atonement mean here? What are "the ends"? The ideas leading up to seem to indicate happiness and punishment. If that is the case, then I have always thought of this in reverse: the atonement answers the ends of the punishment and happiness. But the order is flipped here, and it seems to say that happiness and punishment answer the ends of the atonement. Any thoughts? My understanding is that they are indeed real fruits, but the terms also are used metaphorically. I found an Ensign article by Elder McConkie that validates some of the things discussed here: "in the primeval and Edenic day all forms of life lived in a higher state than now prevails...Death and procreation had yet to enter the world." (Ensign, 06/1982)