Nordic saint

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Nordic saint

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

204 profile views
  1. Nordic saint

    Milton Berle on US movie ratings

    "Den skaldede frisør"
  2. Nordic saint

    Milton Berle on US movie ratings

    It was called "The bald haircutter" It could be argued that the title itself is a red flag 😂
  3. Nordic saint

    Milton Berle on US movie ratings

    Personally I'm very careful about what I watch no matter the rating. I was invited to watch a movie in the cinema with a G rating with my sister, and I thought "well, can't do any harm watching a "childish" movie. Well... It contained sex scenes (and of course, it was adultery just to make it even worse), full body nude scenes and heated up homosexual scenes... Let's just say that I still haven't fully recovered. Moral of the story: even though this is an extreme case, it shows that just because a movie has a certain label, you never really know if it has been made so that The Lord would approve it. Parental guides and alike are still the best guidelines for whether the movie reflects your standards or not
  4. Nordic saint

    I'm so excited!

    If I may say, and this is just a guess based on observations..... I think it's because we as a whole have forgotten Him in our doings. When I hear members talk about church stuff, I rarely hear The Lord mentioned. It's more focused on things we do practically like the Word of Wisdom, self reliance, and family history. While these definitely are good things, people outside of the church will not associate us with The Lord if we don't show that we do such things because of Him. think about it, we even got commanded to focus on the church's proper name instead of "Mormons". Plus, since we often have used Moroni as a symbol, quite a few think that we worship angels.
  5. Nordic saint

    Art of the First Vision

    I really like the one from the "pillar of light" comic. Not because of its artstyle (personally I think it's too dramatic), but I really like how the rest of the personages from the vision is included just as they should
  6. And that's why I mentioned God's part in tithing men are not supposed to dictate how much an honest tithe is, but I can guarantee that you don't want to cheat/mock God.. we know what happens to those kinds of people, so let's just listen to the prophets and the apostels when they have spoken And yes, we are not universalists and I have never indicated that either.... quite the opposite actually
  7. Well, the only thing I can do in this case is to quote the brethren's official statements This is from the first presidency letter from 1070: "For your guidance in this matter, please be advised that we have uniformly replied that the simplest statement we know of is that statement of the Lord himself that the members of the Church should pay one-tenth of all their interest annually, which is understood to mean income. No one is justified in making any other statement than this. We feel that every member of the Church should be entitled to make his own decision as to what he thinks he owes the Lord, and to make payment accordingly." This goes hand in hand with what Robert D. Hales quoted from Handbook 1 in his talk "The divine law of tithing": "The First Presidency has written what the law of tithing is for us today: “The simplest statement we know of is the statement of the Lord himself, namely, that the members of the Church should pay ‘one tenth of all their interest annually,’ which is understood to mean income. No one is justified in making any other statement than this.” (First Presidency letter, 19 March 1970.)" The conclusions: Members are entitled to make their own decision as to what they think they owe the Lord, and to make payment accordingly. No one is justified in making any other statement than the one in the first quote These statements are the newest ones and been repeated ever since. I think though the misunderstanding happened by assuming that I didn't take God into the picture. However, I did say that we should do it by The Spirit of The Lord. In other words, it doesn't mean that whatever we pay in tithing is honest, it means that that it's between you and The Lord with no lifted finger from others. No mortal has the right to say that I have to add $10 extra in tithing to make it right, whether it should be gross or net or what money on my bank account constitutes my income I pesonally think it is really wise how we should let any judgement of our tithing come from God and not man since we mortals tend to become almost like devils when it's about money, especially other people's money
  8. Hi and welcome rustyoz! First of all I feel inspired to give a reminder that tithing is ten percent of one's annual income. How we define income is up to the individual, and even though we can give our personal insights, we are not allowed to instruct others how tithing should be defined beyond this. Now, the questions is, to whom do those money belong to in the first place? This is a really important question, because it's the owner of the money who decides by The Spirit of The Lord what should be defined as income. If I understand this correctly (and let me know if I'm wrong), it's the son who's the owner of the money in the first place. If that's the case, he should prayerfully decide himself whether he considers the money as income or not. Hope that this comment will help in any way
  9. It's quite interesting because Brigham Young's (and Joseph Smith's) descriptions COULD indicate what has been told that heaven for one person would be hell for another (eternal burnings vs fire and brimstone)
  10. Two toughts: 1: being burned alive is one of the most (if not the most) painful way to die. now, doing that in fire and brimstone eternally is quite a strong picture for not being in God's precence. Only one who really despise God would wish for that 2: It's indicated that Gehenna was used as a rubbish heap at the time of jesus. If it's true, a pile of waste burning day and night would make people think twice about risking being compared to that
  11. Usually when I hear people talk about deep doctrines they either refer to: 1: Mormon folklore and conspiracy theories (Cain is Big Foot, Hillary Clinton is the beast from The Book of Revelation) 2: Doctrines or anything religiously related that a person think is too complicated and is put off by it (Jesus is also our father (by covenant), a steel sword was discovered in Jericho) To me, deep doctrine should indicate the richness, the wisdom of the doctrines that has been revealed (don't only forgive seven times but seventy times seven... that one has so many sweet layers)
  12. Nordic saint

    What’s the last movie you watched?

    Vegetales, vegetales and.... vegetales.... Sometimes I wonder if I should've stopped myself in saying "honey, this series with vegetable Bible characters could be good for the toddlers"... now it's like drugs to them
  13. Nordic saint

    David Snell article: Why, David?

    Those essays though are not criticizing but are analysis and discussions. It's not that you take up sensitive topics but how you handle them and for what purpose
  14. Nordic saint

    David Snell article: Why, David?

    ... that's what you get out of writing late at night 😝 What I meant was that people at the same time need to come out of the illusion that prophets (and us) are supposed to be perfect people who don't make mistakes (in other words, a celestial being). There has only been one person on the earth who have accomplished that 🙂
  15. Nordic saint

    David Snell article: Why, David?

    I don't agree with the obsession there has been for a while now with seeking the faults of past leaders (or the present for that matter), even if the intent is good. It takes away the focus of what really matters, the plan of salvation, when we just put our focus on man's mistakes. On the other hand there's another extreme: the obsession of making the prophets stand on pedestals like Greek gods, making them seem as perfect as possible and wipe away the dirt. It's a dangerous tendency as well. You can't argue against a perfect being so the Adam-God theory has to be true, right? If not, the so-called perfect prophet has to be a false prophet. I can go on with this, but get the point. You are supposed to take the whole package of a prophet, not just what you like or what you dislike... It ruins what a prophet really is: an ordained MAN of GOD. I have no problem with talking about a prophet's faults if it's relevant for the occasion, but I would never dare to focus on it. At the same time I won't tolerate that people I know think we're supposed to be gods on earth. Sometimes a sinner but always a saint