california_ave Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 The following is a summary of a blog posted by a Mormon historian who also occasionally writes Utah history articles for the Salt Lake Tribune:The Primary organization originally included boys and girls from 3 to 14 years, but changed the age limits in 1913 (year the Scouting program became recreational program of Young Men's Mutual Improvement Association) so older boys (12-14 yrs) could attend scouting. Only later in 1950 did BSA start offering scouting to 11 yrs. Girls 12-14 remained in the primary organization till 1934 when they too were transferred to the MIA program.Before reading the blog, I had assumed the 12 yr old limit was set by the age of ordaining a deacon. Apparently not. It came from the age a boy could originally become a scout.So where did the 12,14,16 yr ages come from for the ordination of young men to the Aaronic priesthood offices? In Joseph Smith's day, I'm not aware of minor children being ordained to the Aaronic priesthood, so when the change? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Beginning in 1877, the Church established the current practice of ordaining boys to the Aaronic Priesthood at the ward level by age-group and priesthood office. Young men are generally ordained deacons at the age of 12, teachers at the age of 14, and priests at the age of 16. The bishop of each ward presides over the Aaronic Priesthood in the ward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puf_the_majic_dragon Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Beginning in 1877, the Church established the current practice of ordaining boys to the Aaronic Priesthood at the ward level by age-group and priesthood office. Young men are generally ordained deacons at the age of 12, teachers at the age of 14, and priests at the age of 16. The bishop of each ward presides over the Aaronic Priesthood in the ward.Source? I'm just aching for more in depth information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Let me find it again. I found it on lds.org. It took me awhile to find it the first time. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 History There ya go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puf_the_majic_dragon Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Thanks Pam! But it doesn't really mention WHY the change.... which is what I was curious about. Oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miztrniceguy Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Source? I'm just aching for more in depth information.i was expecting a Wiki quote from our resident wiki expert! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarginOfError Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Priesthood advancement -- The First Presidency formally adopted the ages of 12, 15, 18 and 21 as ages for deacon, teacher, priest and elder advancement starting in 1908. The age was reduced for teachers and priests to 14 and 16, respectively, beginning in 1954, and the age for elders was lowered to 19 at about the same time. Seventies quorums in stakes throughout the church were discontinued in 1986.I'm having trouble finding a more official source, but I'm reasonably sure this is true. The article I pulled this quote from is at:LDS programs evolve over the years | Deseret News (Salt Lake City) | Find Articles at BNET Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puf_the_majic_dragon Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 i was expecting a Wiki quote from our resident wiki expert!The wiki article Aaronic priesthood - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia doesn't say a thing about the history or changes, but the source cited for the article Aaronic priesthood - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia has a whole bunch of neat little tidbits.Direct link to the source reference: Redirect URLMaybe if I feel really motivated later I'll update the wiki article with some more historical details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningStar Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 I can't imagine having to be in Primary at age 14. I would be so done with singing "Head Shoulders Knees and Toes" and "Once there Was a Snowman". I was so happy to be a Beehive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truegrits Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 ~~~MorningStar~~~I would be so done with singing "Head Shoulders Knees and Toes" Isn't that the truth. I came to hate that song. It should NOT be let out of the Nursery! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miztrniceguy Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 good job puf...but i was expecting a post from Maureen. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puf_the_majic_dragon Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 (edited) good job puf...but i was expecting a post from Maureen. lolWHAT?! There's somebody else competing for the title of "Resident Wiki Expert"???This can not be allowed to continue! I DEMAND A SHOW DOWN!:edit:PSMorningStar, I think the question is less one of "why graduate primary at 12" and more of "why is the priesthood associated with age and primary graduation". I don't think anybody is going to argue that 12 is a good age (or perhaps even a bit too old) for graduating primary, but whether 12 is a good age for priesthood responsibility - especially as it's laid out in the D&C - might be a point of discussion. Edited July 25, 2008 by puf_the_majic_dragon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miztrniceguy Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruthiechan Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 ~~~MorningStar~~~Isn't that the truth. I came to hate that song. It should NOT be let out of the Nursery! I dunno, those older kids still seem to have fun with it. It's the ones in middle school who find it childish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.