bytor2112 Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 i could be mistaken but im pretty sure it was socrates who was the first to call himself a philosopherPhilosophy was first brought into connection with practical life by Pythagoras of Samos (about 582-504 BCE), from whom it received its name: "the love of wisdom". Regarding the world as perfect harmony, dependent on number, he aimed at inducing humankind likewise to lead a harmonious life. His doctrine was adopted and extended by a large following of Pythagoreans, including Damon, especially in Lower Italy.-Encyclopedia of Philosophy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowhunter Posted October 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 gah dang u bytor using quotes to prove my baseless clames wrong ur evil xD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elphaba Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 Confuscius, the Chinese philosopher that many people still revere today, lived from 551-498 BC. I think his wisdom rivals that of Pythagoras (though not his math!). Elphaba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowhunter Posted October 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 IMHO opion Buddha is one the greates if not the greatest philophser in history Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hemidakota Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 Unlikely since Enoch had more wisdom than any of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowhunter Posted October 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 oh come on Buddha was amazing and besides the biblical prophets were inspired by God the others were on their own Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hemidakota Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 How do you think these people gain wisdom? Or inventions? Or inspiring ideas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rameumptom Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 I've always been impressed by the philosophers Solon (640-560 BCE) and Bozo the Clown. As for the Trinity, regardless of how one attempts to describe it as A God, my point is that most of the world views the Trinity as polytheistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiJolly Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 oh come on Buddha was amazing and besides the biblical prophets were inspired by God the others were on their ownI don't believe that is the case. I am sure millions if not billions of people from all geographies, all races, all belief systems, are inspired by God. Buddha would be a major one, if only because he provided a useful alternative to rampant polytheistic Hinduism for his people. HiJolly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rameumptom Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 Alma 29:8 teaches that God inspires people all over the world with the amount of truth and light they are ready and willing to receive. Buddha was sent to a people that were ready to hear his amount of light and truth. Brigham Young and Pres Kimball both taught that Buddha, Mohammed, and others were inspired of God to impart some truth to a people that needed at least some enlightenment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowhunter Posted October 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 you know i never thought of it that way but it does make alot of sense i mean reading the moral teachings of Buddha they line up very well with what Jesus taught so it makes sense that they would come from the same source Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maya Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 Back to God.. just something that I never noticed to be taken as a prof of it that Jesus and God are 2 different persons. In Matteus 20 17-... Jesus Himself says that He can not decide WHO will sit on His left or right but only God can decide that! I just found that yesterday when reading the scriptures... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rameumptom Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Yes, Jesus definitely insisted there was a physical and internal distinction between himself and the Father. "Not my will, but thine be done" suggests that they were not linked in a physical or mental way that would have One God thinking and willing the same way without effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maureen Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 As for the Trinity, ....my point is that most of the world views the Trinity as polytheistic.I would disagree, since there are millions that accept the Trinity doctrine because it is monotheistic. Do you have any sources to prove your point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bytor2112 Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 I would disagree, since there are millions that accept the Trinity doctrine because it is monotheistic. Do you have any sources to prove your point?Do millions accept the doctrine of the Trinity because it is monotheistic or is it because they have been taught that they should believe it? I mean, how do you know that the Trinity is true and not just a very old misunderstanding of the Godhead foisted on Christians through out the past centuries? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abqfriend Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Do not other religious traditions have value? -I guess not-at least as your description of how the Trinity doctrine was "foisted" on Christians. Such a doctrine may not be a tenet of your faith-but it is of mine and millions of other Christians.Please consider how you post things for us non -LDS members of this board-especially on this section-about learning about the Mormon Church.-Thank You.Carol-a Catholic InvestigatorDo millions accept the doctrine of the Trinity because it is monotheistic or is it because they have been taught that they should believe it? I mean, how do you know that the Trinity is true and not just a very old misunderstanding of the Godhead foisted on Christians through out the past centuries? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rameumptom Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Given that just over 2 billion people are Trinitarians, I'd wager that the majority of them believe they are monotheists. Of course, that is based on the belief that they truly understand the Trinity, and not a form of modalism. However, almost 4 billion people on earth are not Trinitarian. Of those, almost 1 billion Muslims would agree that the Trinity is polytheistic, as the Quran condemns the concept of making Jesus equal to God (they view him as a prophet only). Buddhists and Hindus that I've known would probably consider it polytheistic, albeit I have never formally inquired. I suppose I would have to ask Elphaba and the other agnostics/atheists on the list their opinion on whether they see the Trinity as one or many gods/persons. So, while the vast majority of the world may not view the Trinity as polytheistic, I would be surprised if at least half the world didn't consider it polytheistic. Having said that, what does it matter? Many Christians think Mormons worship Joseph Smith, but that doesn't make it true, either. And I do not believe, as bytor, who seems to keep putting his foot in his mouth, that the Trinity was foisted upon anyone. I believe there was political intrigue and infighting during the Nicene Council, but that does not denote foisting it on anyone. Those who disagreed had the chance to start their own religions, as did Mohammed later on when he realized the Trinity was polytheistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abqfriend Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 (edited) Thank you for sharing your views. It is not important to a Trinitarian Christian that a Buddhist, Hindu or Muslims consider that most Chrstians are polytheists.That you and I hold different views on the Trinity or Godhead is our choice.Ultimately--both views rest on faith.-CarolGiven that just over 2 billion people are Trinitarians, I'd wager that the majority of them believe they are monotheists. Of course, that is based on the belief that they truly understand the Trinity, and not a form of modalism.However, almost 4 billion people on earth are not Trinitarian. Of those, almost 1 billion Muslims would agree that the Trinity is polytheistic, as the Quran condemns the concept of making Jesus equal to God (they view him as a prophet only). Buddhists and Hindus that I've known would probably consider it polytheistic, albeit I have never formally inquired. I suppose I would have to ask Elphaba and the other agnostics/atheists on the list their opinion on whether they see the Trinity as one or many gods/persons.So, while the vast majority of the world may not view the Trinity as polytheistic, I would be surprised if at least half the world didn't consider it polytheistic. Having said that, what does it matter? Many Christians think Mormons worship Joseph Smith, but that doesn't make it true, either.And I do not believe, as bytor, who seems to keep putting his foot in his mouth, that the Trinity was foisted upon anyone. I believe there was political intrigue and infighting during the Nicene Council, but that does not denote foisting it on anyone. Those who disagreed had the chance to start their own religions, as did Mohammed later on when he realized the Trinity was polytheistic. Edited October 2, 2008 by abqfriend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bytor2112 Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Do not other religious traditions have value? -I guess not-at least as your description of how the Trinity doctrine was "foisted" on Christians. Such a doctrine may not be a tenet of your faith-but it is of mine and millions of other Christians.Please consider how you post things for us non -LDS members of this board-especially on this section-about learning about the Mormon Church.-Thank You.Carol-a Catholic InvestigatorCarol.....with all due respect, it was just a question and not a denunciation of anyone's faith tradition. Of course other religious traditions have value :). I simply asked how Maureen knew it was true....how she personally discerned it. I was asking an honest question and hoping for a sincere reply. Please don't read more into the question than that. I am a convert to the LDS faith and once upon a time accepted the doctrine of the trinity as taught by orthodox christianity. I believed it....didn't understand it, but believed it because I was taught to believe it.Maureen made the comment that millions accept the trinity doctrine because it is monotheistic.......I said how do you know it is not accepted because it has been passed down through the ages and taught as truth? In other words....if I were asked..."how do you know the LDS doctrine of the Godhead is true and not just some contrived story made up by Joseph Smith"........I would be able to answer the question and not take offense at the inquirers question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maureen Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 However, almost 4 billion people on earth are not Trinitarian. Of those, almost 1 billion Muslims would agree that the Trinity is polytheistic, as the Quran condemns the concept of making Jesus equal to God (they view him as a prophet only). Buddhists and Hindus that I've known would probably consider it polytheistic, albeit I have never formally inquired.I barely know anything about what Muslims, Buddists and Hindus believe and I suspect that the majority of those faiths do not know what Christians believe and may possibly be indifferent to know. It can go both ways. If you suspect that Christians may not even understand their own doctrine of the Trinity, I really doubt you could imagine that the majority of those of other religions study and contemplate the Trinity extensively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bytor2112 Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 And I do not believe, as bytor, who seems to keep putting his foot in his mouth, that the Trinity was foisted upon anyone. I believe there was political intrigue and infighting during the Nicene Council, but that does not denote foisting it on anyone. Those who disagreed had the chance to start their own religions, as did Mohammed later on when he realized the Trinity was polytheistic. Foot in mouth?????!! How so? I asked Maureen a question regarding how she knew it because millions think it monotheistic and not just because it has been passed down as doctrinal truth. Everyone is sooooooo sensitive:confused:Foist: 1. To pass off as genuine, valuable, or worthy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rameumptom Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Bytor, It is the terminology you are using. Terms like "foist" suggest something illegitimate that is passed on. IOW, you are undermining your own intent by using explosive terms. I don't think you meant it, but it basically is putting one's foot in one's mouth, when we say/write something that has other connotations to the listener/reader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenRaines Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Bytor, your definition is correct. "To pass off". It is not actually genuine, valuable or worthy. That is what foist means. Sounds like a misunderstanding to me. If I understand. :) Ben Raines Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bytor2112 Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 So your saying.....that if I would have wrote "taught to" rather than "foisted on" my mouth would be clear of my foot ? Well maybe......but either way it was a sincere inquiry and worded to evoke a bit of thought as to why it is accepted.....I didn't think it would be an "explosive" word. The question asked is "how do you know it was not something "foisted".....illegimately passed on.....exactly. It wasn't an accusation...it was a question....how do you know it wasn't something illegitimately passed on. Still haven't been answered......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ceeboo Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Bytor, If you need any help with these LDS people, just let me know and I will jump in. God bless, Carl ( a monotheistic trinitarian ):) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.