Where do missionaries *not* serve?


bl8tant
 Share

Recommended Posts

A friend who's recently started reading the Book of Mormon asked me a question the other day: where do missionaries *not* currently serve?

I think I got most of the easy ones:

  • Some countries (Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE) prohibit missionaries for religious reasons
  • Others, like China, Cuba, and North Korea, don't permit them on general principles
  • Some countries are too dangerous for missionaries to serve in (Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia)

I'm guessing that there are areas in the US where missionaries aren't assigned, or don't work actively-- seems like, say, the Badlands or the area south of I-10 in the Atchafalaya probably aren't very fertile missionary areas.

Is there a canonical list anywhere of places that don't allow missionaries, or where no missionaries are currently serving? Did I miss any major ones on the above list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing that there are areas in the US where missionaries aren't assigned, or don't work actively-- seems like, say, the Badlands or the area south of I-10 in the Atchafalaya probably aren't very fertile missionary areas.

How small do you want to subdivide? For instance Missionaries aren't allowed to actively work the Gonzaga Campus in Spokane. Also, are you counting humanitarian missions? It's work but it isn't proselyting.

Is there a canonical list anywhere of places that don't allow missionaries, or where no missionaries are currently serving? Did I miss any major ones on the above list?

It isn't official but all the information I can find is positive, for instance:

LDS Mission Network - Mission Index List

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How small do you want to subdivide? For instance Missionaries aren't allowed to actively work the Gonzaga Campus in Spokane. Also, are you counting humanitarian missions? It's work but it isn't proselyting.

It isn't official but all the information I can find is positive, for instance:

LDS Mission Network - Mission Index List

Interesting- I didn't know about Gonzaga. And yes, I was thinking about areas where proselyting missionaries cannot or do not serve. I figure humanitarian missionaries are pretty much everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently no U.S. American missionaries in Bolivia. They were basically kicked out by the current junta. We can thank the inept actions of both presidents Bush and Obama for the problem.

Of course, we do have Bolivian and other Latin American missionaries serving there right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the general authorities once pointed that home/visiting teaching is missionary work to members, and missionary work is home/visiting teaching to non-members. (If someone remembers who said this, please post it.) Moreover, we were told in the ME that simply being a good friend and servant--such Ammon was initially to the Lamanites--is one of the best forms of missionary work. So in this sense, wherever there are members of Church are who are doing their home/visiting teaching to fellow members and being a good friend and example to non-members missionary work is being done. Those countries would include many of the countries named where "missionary work" is prohibited due to safety concerns or some kind of prohibition. Of course, this isn't what your friend meant when the question was asked. Besides the countries already mentioned, one would also include the countries of the ME and its neighbors, which would inlcude Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, where, interestingly, there once was a "mission" that lasted until about the end of WW I. The exception to this would be Lebanon, which later became part of the Swiss mission and missionaries were there into the 1970s. Some of the missionaries who served in the mission that included Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Palestine until the end of WW I are buried in Aleppo, Syria, one of the three Christian cities of Syria (Homs and Damascus being the other two). Also, there are the service couples, who while they cannot proselytize in some of these countries, are quiet participants in the work, and service couples are in Turkey, and at least three, possibly four, countries I know of on the Arabian Peninsula.

As members, we might appreciate this b Elder Orson F. Whitney:

There are those who are not members of the Church who "can do more good for the cause where the Lord has place them, than anywhere else . . . Hence, some are drawnn into the fold and receive a testimony of the truth; while others remain unconverted . . . the beauties and glories of the gospel being veiled temporarily from their view, for a wise purpose. The Lord will open their eyes in HIs own due time. God is using more than one people for the accomplishment of His great and marvelous work. The Latter-day Saints cannot do it all. It is too vast, too arduous for any one people . . ." (CR April, 1928).

When I read this I think of my own father who was born out of the Church, yet when he came into the Church and got his patriarchal blessing, we were surprised to see that it starts out just like a blessing for those born into the Church. It states that he was faithful in the "pre-existence" but that he used his agency to be born into a family that were not members because of the good he could do and that he made a covenant that when the time came for him to join the Church, he would help bring the gospel to those of his family who were not members.

I'm also reminded that our greatest "missionary" in Saudi is a Muslim friend of the Church. He's the one who, of his own volition and without any encouragement from the members, spreads the gospel among those of his own faith.

Of course, I realize I've been off-topic for a bit so I best stop. Just some more thoughts to reflect on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

One of the general authorities once pointed that home/visiting teaching is missionary work to members, and missionary work is home/visiting teaching to non-members. (If someone remembers who said this, please post it.)

It's actually quoted in PMG:

President Harold B. Lee (1972–1973)

“Missionary work is but home teaching to those who are not now members of the Church,

and home teaching is nothing more or less than missionary work to Church members”

(Improvement Era, Dec. 1964, 1078).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

It seems these countries do not have missions:

Afghanistan
Algeria
Andorra
Antigua and Barbuda
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belize
Bhutan
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brunei
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Congo-Brazzaville)
Croatia
Cuba
Djibouti
Dominica
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini (fmr. “Swaziland”)
Gabon
Gambia
Grenada
Guinea-Bissau
Holy See
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kiribati
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Lesotho
Libya
Luxembourg
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Moldova
Monaco
Montenegro
Morocco
Myanmar (formerly Burma)
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Niger
North Korea
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine State
Qatar
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Slovakia
Somalia
South Sudan
Sudan
Suriname
Syria
Tajikistan
Timor-Leste
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Yemen

At least without verifying there are not any missions that have 2 countries besides Belgium.

Edited by Nate Robinson
Finding more countries removed more from this list where the church doesn't have a mission
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may not have actual missions located in that country but many of the countries on the list fall under a mission

Belize has missionaries but they fall under the El Salvador San Salvador West/Belize Mission.  

Croatia is in the Adriatic North Mission.

In 2007 the India New Delhi Mission was formed and included Pakistan.  In 2010 the Pakistan Service Mission was established. 

Turkey falls under the Bulgaria Sofia Mission.

Most of countries I see on this list are predominately Muslim or they are countries that right now are deemed too dangerous to send missionaries to.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share