Was Jesus A Man Before He Became God?

[Serg]

Just that you are wrong in relation to the systematic trinity belief and Scripture consistency. Just as wrong when you speak of numbers and positios(of belief), it matters not to a sound argument wether nobody or many people oppose it.

LOL,

[Maureen]

Just that you are wrong in relation to the systematic trinity belief and Scripture consistency.

I also disagree with your opinion of scripture consistency when it comes to the doctrine of the Trinity. I believe scripture supports the Trinity doctrine, if you do not, that is just fine.

Just as wrong when you speak of numbers and positios(of belief), it matters not to a sound argument wether nobody or many people oppose it.

Not necessarily. If a group of diverse believers accept a doctrine as scriptural and can show scriptural evidence for that doctrine, than I think that that shows a unity in belief. Whether you or GB-UK disagree with the doctrine, does not dismiss its veracity with those believers that accept it.

M.

[Latter Days Guy]

<div class='quotemain'>

Just that you are wrong in relation to the systematic trinity belief and Scripture consistency.

I also disagree with your opinion of scripture consistency when it comes to the doctrine of the Trinity. I believe scripture supports the Trinity doctrine, if you do not, that is just fine.

Just as wrong when you speak of numbers and positios(of belief), it matters not to a sound argument wether nobody or many people oppose it.

Not necessarily. If a group of diverse believers accept a doctrine as scriptural and can show scriptural evidence for that doctrine, than I think that that shows a unity in belief. Whether you or GB-UK disagree with the doctrine, does not dismiss its veracity with those believers that accept it.

M.

I think the point that he was trying to make is that it doesn't matter how many people believe something is true, doesn't makes that thing true. Clearly you have made up your mind and I have made up mine. Therefore there is little point in going round in circles arguing the same point over and over again, so I must agree to disagree with you on this particular point of doctrine.