Just_A_Guy Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 RPGs and MBTs are useful for hardened targets - criminals aren't hardened in that way. Landmines are indiscriminately killing anyone who steps on them - useful only you know where the enemy is, and if there are no innocents in the area - I'm having a hard time seeing why a good guy would want that. None of those are really useful in self-defense scenarios. So I'd have to say no, we shouldn't be doing the opposite and legislating more civilian access to stuff like that. I mean, I guess it wasn't totally intended as a serious question, but there's the serious answer.IIRC, that clown in Colorado was wearing bullet-resistant tactical gear and took several shots before finally surrendering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.