Guest Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Here is a proof that shows why it is difficult for engineers to get rich. Time is money: t = $Knowledge is power: K = PPower definition: P = W / t by substitution: K = W / $ Solve for $: $ = W / K Therefore, with a constant W, the smarter you are, the poorer you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie123 Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 Here is a proof that shows why it is difficult for engineers to get rich. Time is money: t = $Knowledge is power: K = PPower definition: P = W / t by substitution: K = W / $ Solve for $: $ = W / K Therefore, with a constant W, the smarter you are, the poorer you are.Or alternatively the smarter you are, the less money you spend to do the same amount of work Vort, Blackmarch and Traveler 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 That depends on which is considered the independent variable vs the dependent variable and which is the constant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mordorbund Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 That depends on which is considered the independent variable vs the dependent variable and which is the constant. I think it depends on whether "money" is an expense or an income. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 (edited) I'll rephrase. Regardless of which is which or whether $ is an expense or income: As K approaches infinity, $ approaches zero since W by necessity is a finite number. Edited November 9, 2015 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vort Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 Or alternatively the smarter you are, the less money you spend to do the same amount of work To completely destroy a clever little joke through unwarranted rational analysis is almost criminal. But here you go. Jamie is right. The equivalency "time is money" is saying that time spent is money spent. Therefore, the final formulation, $ = W/K is most correctly read, "Time spent equals work divided by knowledge". This means that knowledge and time spent are inversely proportional: As knowledge increases, time spent decreases. Which is a primary reason we go to school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mordorbund Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 To completely destroy a clever little joke through unwarranted rational analysis is almost criminal. But here you go. Jamie is right. The equivalency "time is money" is saying that time spent is money spent. Therefore, the final formulation, $ = W/K is most correctly read, "Time spent equals work divided by knowledge". This means that knowledge and time spent are inversely proportional: As knowledge increases, time spent decreases. Which is a primary reason we go to school. Or you can quit working to minimize spending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.