Lost Boy Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 I called it last year that church was going to change the policy on Temple marriage. https://www.deseretnews.com/article/900069248/church-marriage-temple-sealing-policy-mormon-lds.html?fbclid=IwAR2sZrIlNUt0XekdNoNL4Tje3fFGMGLoL3MOtp7frwE0er03aPEhh9VrSMQ This is a good change. Let everyone celebrate the marriage. Let the sealing be sacred. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaleG Posted May 20, 2019 Report Share Posted May 20, 2019 On 5/6/2019 at 10:42 PM, Lost Boy said: I called it last year that church was going to change the policy on Temple marriage. https://www.deseretnews.com/article/900069248/church-marriage-temple-sealing-policy-mormon-lds.html?fbclid=IwAR2sZrIlNUt0XekdNoNL4Tje3fFGMGLoL3MOtp7frwE0er03aPEhh9VrSMQ This is a good change. Let everyone celebrate the marriage. Let the sealing be sacred. I had a question about this part of the article. But the change will be felt most keenly in the United States and Canada, where a one-year waiting period for a temple sealing after a civil marriage was the policy for about 100 years, according to a previous blog post by historian Ardis Parshall. Parshall wrote that among the reasons the one-year wait was instituted was a concern among leaders like church President Joseph F. Smith and the man who succeeded him in 1918, President Heber J. Grant, that elaborate public wedding celebrations among Latter-day Saints in Utah were turning the sacred temple sealing into an afterthought. Did they have elaborate public wedding celebrations back in the time in Utah when this policy was created and was this was serious enough to extend the policy to all of Canada and the U.S.? Thank you, Gale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
estradling75 Posted May 20, 2019 Report Share Posted May 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, GaleG said: I had a question about this part of the article. But the change will be felt most keenly in the United States and Canada, where a one-year waiting period for a temple sealing after a civil marriage was the policy for about 100 years, according to a previous blog post by historian Ardis Parshall. Parshall wrote that among the reasons the one-year wait was instituted was a concern among leaders like church President Joseph F. Smith and the man who succeeded him in 1918, President Heber J. Grant, that elaborate public wedding celebrations among Latter-day Saints in Utah were turning the sacred temple sealing into an afterthought. Did they have elaborate public wedding celebrations back in the time in Utah when this policy was created and was this was serious enough to extend the policy to all of Canada and the U.S.? Thank you, Gale That is what the Parshall says in the bolded part. Utah is the headquarters of the church... as goes the headquarters so goes the rest of the church for policies.. unless it has good reasons not to. Culturally Utah-US-Canda have a whole lot in common... Fads and trends can easily be held in common through them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traveler Posted May 23, 2019 Report Share Posted May 23, 2019 I have wondered if this is a prelude to other things (change) to come. I am convinced that nothing happens without reason and as time has altered our social structure so will the ordinances of G-d conform to accommodate social changes in civil law. As traditional marriage and family has become a threat to social justice; a growing number have decided that a union between a man and a woman should not define lawful marriage - I have pondered if the day will come when marriages are no longer performed in temples - only sealings. This would be necessary if enemies of the traditional family and the Church attempted to force the Church to perform homosexual marriages to maintain legal licence to marry. So, in essence the Church would no longer perform marriages (either in the temple or outside the temple, such as a bishop performing a marriage for time only). This would mean that all marriages would be performed according to civil and lawful authority (from which the Church would voluntarily withdraw) and that only sealing would be performed in the temple. So I ponder if The L-rd is setting the table to preserve the ordinance of sealing without conflicting with changes to civil law. Those that are rejoicing in such policy changes may not realize the winds that are causing the sails to be set differently are not signalling better times - but rather a widening of the gap separating the Saints of G-d from the world. The Traveler mrmarklin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.