Carborendum Posted July 6, 2021 Report Share Posted July 6, 2021 (edited) Correct: CRT was supposed to be taught as a legal theory in the collegiate level among law students. It was never meant to be taught at a lower level as historical/political fact. Incorrect: It is your (schools) job to teach math and science. It is our (parents/family) job to teach them about life. The simple fact is that Reading, Writing, Arithmetic, history, etc. CANNOT adequately be taught without also teaching about life. It is never about a "school" (worth its name) teaching academics without also teaching values. It is only a question of "which" values are going to be taught. We don't object to values being taught in schools. We object to values we disagree with being taught in schools. This is true from whatever background one may come from. But if we give in to one person's request for values being met, then another person loses. There is no win-win in a system like this. The contradiction here is: 1) We have expectations that "the government" is in charge of paying for that education. 2) We expect to be in charge of what value system will be taught. You can't have both. Either you pay for it, or someone else will decide what to teach your children about life. Edited July 6, 2021 by Carborendum NeuroTypical, Fether and Anddenex 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.