It appears Roe Vs. Wade is about to be overturned.
As the topic says. I know many are rejoicing, but as I've stated in the past, this has grave ramifications regarding precedence and laws based upon this.
It appears that at the core of the issue is the right to privacy, which seems to be what will be attacked in order to justify what is logically the next steps.
On the side for Evangelical Religion Followers (which, I may remind the forum, overall have been hostile to the Church over the past 40 years, and eventually in the worst case
Agreed. Indeed, that was the point I was trying to make.
That isn't entirely accurate. Roe v. Wade did impose restrictions on that right, afterall. In fact, I'd say that it made a reasonable effort to balance the conflict between the right of the woman to bodily autonomy and the rights of the fetus. But regardless, even Roe recognized it as an alienable right. And the pro-choice movement at large seems to be content with that placement of alieneability. (making up new forms of alienabl
