If this is the case, then I guess the question is should two-deep apply to priesthood functions? I don't think the reasons for BSA's two-deep policy (mainly to protect the youth from inappropriate conduct by adults and to protect adults from baseless allegations from youth or their families) suddenly cease to apply to priesthood functions. Sadly, even priesthood holders can act inappropriately with youth. Additionally, an allegation can be fabricated against a priesthood holder (think of rebellous youth or an anti-LDS parent looking to lash out at the Church) just as easily as it could be fabricated against an adult scout leader. It just surprises me that there is an apparent assumption by members that nothing bad could possibly happen when we are in the Lord's service, or that avoiding risk is not worth the minor inconvience it would create. IMO it isn't wise to put youth in that situation, and it is asking a lot of the adult priesthood holder to risk his reputation, his resources, and possibly his freedom (all of which could be lost in the instance of an allegation of inappropriate behavior) unnecessarily in performing his priesthood duties.