j3000ad

I guess is what I'm looking for is a detailed expiation of why certain parts of the law of mosses are kept and why other parts have been done away with it's not that I have a problem with is its just I like to understand the detail of why certain parts are no longer needed as it seems it’s been more amended then done away with . I don’t like inconsistencies and to say they law is fulfilled which is fine but then keep lots of it and do away with or parts of it doesn’t make a lot of census to me.

Your now changing it if the law has been fulfilled and is no longer needed that is different to saying the law became corrupted and need to be brought back into line. They are two very different things. Plus if that’s the case why was blood atonement still practiced in the early church?

SO if you are saying that is what Jesus gave that to replace the mosaic law why do we still need marriage?

Thanks but that doesn't answer my question!

In regards to the word fulfilled the mosaic law. SO does this mean the law no longer applies and we don't have to take any notice of it and what law as put in its place to replace it?