ShootingStar

If you have proposedly agreed that the Bible has unfully written verse and is not fully a compromising book nor the book of Mormon, and later on add on to say by very diverted conversation that the LDS President is just as ideal as them who wrote the Bible nevertheless has capacity to regain the status of God unlike ever before, this sounds to me like a mind not fully made up according to the precept of self because if the Mortal of God is just as good as the Latter day President then this sounds confusing whether the full Gospel has been intactly given as aid according to the narration of a member. Truth for truth, reconcile must be absorbed, not selfishly, but pardonably, not carelessly, but importantly. I believe in God, I believe in the Holy Spirit to work through Jesus Christ and make Jesus Christ's will guided and sustained by fullest capability. I would rather lean on someone I can make understanding with, otherwise, grappling and rigorous talk needs to take a break for health's sake.

I wrote something, maybe it was discarded, but what I proclaimed, was sensitive, what I proclaimed, made measure with announcing that even Prophets are mortals just like Job was reassured to be mortal, what I announced, made measure that Jesus Christ prefers His doctrine before any other human civil leader of all time status. Jesse-

To be correct, what mission or purpose is it to drive out a advice from the Bible and correct it with a modernized translation, if this is what we call clearer announcement from an Apostle then the Apostle is made substituded as mightier then the Prophet of old with recognition of man, but the verse of Christ is to always be sustained, yes Him the Incarnate Word. When people say they hearken a truth, and others say it is not a truth, there is many citizens upset, if we would only go through beyond the word itself and embark to the substance of the word of God not the literal compositions of them that contradict each other but the craving thereof from them compositions which are revering the pentecost and muscle-ling with the flesh, then if we see contrary doctrines who say that Christ came for a certain reason of such, rather then what oneself believes, it is more important to accept the person who is praiseworthy pleasing who may contradict you then to shut that person down because even though there may be incorrectness with interpreting, that does not mean that good sentiments do not come across as beliked by different faiths of Christ upholding. What you have decreed is to me a narration of what could be said on a pulpit. If your heart believes that your genuine God would like you for defending modern translations that seek to outgrow the ancient ones, you are saying that you have just as much as authority as a much prefered Prophet of God, rather someone who is more then a Prophet, this is not to upset you, but this is to let you know that there have been very spiritual elderly men of greatest reverence of all time and if their doctrine is made substituted then their dignity is also. It is well to seek a inspiration from God and if your actions agree with God, then you are a true saint, then you are sustained by the word of God that edifies, if this is so, then you are likened like a Prophet and then if it is suitable, then you can declare the ancient Prophet's verses to be replaced by yours only if God is intrigued so much so with you or anyone else. The true are free from pandemonium just like the truth sets us all free. Reverence needs to take charge because it is a quickened sentiment that can defeat all sorts of trickery and traps from the devil himself, the word of God is a thing that has narrated many a story but nevertheless, the advice from the spirit of God never has failed.

What my God decrees for me is love, much more personalized then the book of Mormon to me. If my God is a book, then I am a person in the book paying homage to God. Jesse-

When you point out that the scrutinizing of the Bible is must because of it's lack of interpretation, then what are you made of that you call yourself a friend of God's word sir? I like to think that when we talk about this stuff likewise, it is either going to draw people closer or off of God, please let it be for the best.

As I said before, I did it because I would have been frightened that God would be made without proof from our conclusions. No need to bite your tongue sir, I do like how you express yourself and you did impress me with your tone. I need to hear that God can do what God wants before man and man to not question God for anything God did, otherwise, it is hopeful to yearn the Prophets of God because they are fulfilled due their devotion, and we are just trying to surpass this present tension called life when we adore and uphold the ways of God.

If the word of God is said to be contradicted, this is loosing touch with the equilibrium of reverence to God Almighty, we must be careful, and put our insights like very delicate things, for it is possible that an insight claiming Holy property may become a thing of differencing people instead of making this same people unite closer, I am speaking of the messages that contradict each other for the sake of the just, this should just be lowered in significance and the influence of God does not lie. It has been said that the Bible has contradictions, I say about thus that, the Bible although we understand it is potent, that, the Bible has many a versions come to haught, this is like making different versions of water, one water may be purer then many. Read my lips, no body who dares say that the Bible errs is complimenting God, or even God's angels of light. With all this said upon, no one has mentioned that the Bible was made for one thing and one thing alone, and that is to have hearkens from people to become self sufficient with wholesome embrace of word that edifies. If you say the Bible makes mistakes then you also are saying that Godliness is nonfundamental.

It has been very strong of you to meet me siouxz72.

How are you so full of grace ceeboo?

Thank you Hemidakota for your pleasure about agreeing with the genuine member, ceeboo.

Dear Palerider I would be interested to know more of this body of circulation messages from your own words, thank you for your intactness about this prior example.

Did you think that over reaction was nessesary Islander?

Thank you for your capability for me DR T.

Hello hello... I am of taste to overwhelming spirituality. I care to fasten toward the light of perspective, including your own inclination to cooperate with me. I come as supportive, I know what a good church is possible with LDS, I feel that people are wanderers in the internet seeking like hungry people waiting to establish themselves with a vibrant and gentle firm community, what I hear from Mormons is that they are so sure that they can respect this and this, that and that, either people need this respect or they already have it. Now um I am willing with the Gospel, even though I appreciate the mixed culture of therapeutic venue of foreign affairs of Religious covenant. I am not willing to back down from defending a good or noble person rather the grateful person who does in fact lead by example and can be found in any culture before the times of Mormonism stood up to change the world, which I like to agree that not everybody will ever conclude that they can truly respect gentle precautions, and so it has it that this life is very mixed up with an anything goes sort of trial according to what we ourselves go forth in interest. I believe in the foundations of my nation to be correct, they are truly a way of saying to every being that the complimentary is honor in proof of good esteem. I am a generous person, unattached to any sort of generalization of any sort of labels that put reason to limits. Amen. I love you all.