Newcomer4831
-
Posts
87 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Newcomer4831
-
-
Also, I guess that the "holy" books of God don't even contain a single math equation.
I saw a thing where the name "Elohim" means "1 of many Gods". El meaning God, and ohim being a plural suffix.
I'm also heard from a crazy old man who said "The word God came from Good, because God is Good and God doesn't like to be inefficient so he dropped the extra O." He said this like God was some kind of Efficiency director and somehow saying Good takes far too much time to say than God.
-
I confess, I don't understand this "proof". You start by assuming x*0=0, then go through a chain of arithmetic that arrives you at the conclusion that 0=x*0. But that was your initial assumption, so as a proof, it appears to be circular.
That's because it's not a conjecture or even an observation, but a definition. 0 is the additive identity, defined as that number which, when added to any number x, returns x. Starting from basic number theory principles, it is straightforward to show that the additive identity in the real number system has the value 0, and that the same 0 times any number also yields 0. (This answer is intuitively obvious in language because of our happy choice in using "times" for multiplication.)
In any case, the OP is correct. As a group, religious folks suck at math. The unspoken part is that, as a group, atheists suck at math just as badly if not worse.
That's because the proof he gave you wasn't the proof. You can't use your own theorem to prove your theorem, you have to use substitution or another proven theorem. It's like saying you earned 10 dollars from your own wallet.
The proof is as of follows.
a*1=a <- identity axiom
a*(1+0)=a <identity axiom of addition
a*1+a*0=a <-distributive axiom
a+a*0=a <-identity axiom again
a*0=a-a <-subtract the a's
a*0=0 thusly the theorem is proven.
If you are wondering about axioms, axioms are products of nature. They are imaginative yet correspond to real world situations. Much like the economy. all theories in math, even Euler's equation e^(i*pi)+1=0 can be derived in this fashion.
As far as losing faith, you have to question the derivatives of such things. Such perplexities such as morality and even heaven, where does that come from. If this is true "How could a being who uses the laws of nature at his desire to create worlds and mankind not love math?" then he certainly breaks his own law when Jesus feeds the masses. Where is the truth in that? Again when he creates woman from a rib. And if God really is an axiom, can he really be as elementary as a*1=a?
-
I'm a Math major, fell in love with the subject ever since I met the Dr. House of mathematics. However, it's leading me down this path of "non-believing". A friend of mine even said that he's now an atheist because of mathematics. Another person (of atheism) stated that Christians (or any person of piety-math joke) isn't good at math. What do you guys think?
-
ask them
-Charley
I would imagine the devil, who can commit the most evil of evil, would lie.
-
How much of history plays in truth?
-
The Bhagavad Gita to me has so many ties to the basis of religion than anything else. "I am your creator. If you have the utmost submission and faith in me, you will go to heaven and all of the universe will flow smoothly."-Krishan
-
Ok new question, tangible subject.
You hear a voice, how do you determine if it is Satan or God?
If you do what the voice commands you:
If it's God, then all is good.
If it's Satan, then are you tempted and will go to hell.
If you don't follow:
If it's God, it's sin and you go to hell.
If it's Satan, then all is good.
Is this right?
-
"Some poisons are clear and oderless, they look just like water."
-
I'm attempting to answer a bunch of topics without quotes, bear with me.
What's stopping from the voice that Nephi heard to actually be Satan?
Just to tell you, the fundamentalist Muslims believe that the death of the infidels is has net worth for the people to be saved. If you kill an infidel, you are hindering his/his group, from preventing the will or message of God to be spread. The death of 1 or a billion infidels is worth 1 life to be saved.
I in fact would refuse God if it conflicted with my God given reason and also if it conflicted with God's own commandments. I would like to model my life after Jesus, and I can't even imagine Jesus slaying a man, no matter how wrong he is or unrighteous. Even if the Heavens opened up, I would imagine Jesus praying and saying "Please Father, forgive him."
And I can bear witness that an atheist would not do what God tells him, a Buddhist (sorry if I'm wrapping you up this Bodhigirl) wouldn't do it either, a Jainist wouldn't do, and a scientist who's whole career hinges on reason would not murder someone based on the fact that God told him. (A Buddhist wouldn't do it because of a certain incident regarding the near death of the Buddha; many monks were killed in the process)
I didn't understand your "magical thinking" paragraph.
And again I fail to see the positive outcomes of the death. (I'm sorry Elgama) But we don't need mass genocide and the greastest crimes against humanity just for mere documentation. I would rather have Ann Frank alive, today perhaps, then what she experienced. However, Elgama seems to be making the best of a bad situation, but in all honesty, would you rather have the Holocaust never happen or would you rather have read the accounts of the Holocaust so you can have some profound understanding of human nature? I for one would rather have the Holocaust never happen.
Dravin:
Yes Dravin, death is inevitable. No one in existence is immortal; even Jesus who raised the dead, couldn't make Lazarus immortal; Lazarus couldn't escape death, he just had prolonged life. However to say that God kills via heart attack, I have no way to know God's intentions. That would take "magical thinking." However to see the intentions of Nephi, we can see the wrongful intentions. How do we know it's wrongful, because we have a thing called empathy. I just watched a show on NatGeo about Bonobo and Chimpanzee behaviors and they even have some form of empathy. How does Laban feel, how does his family feel, how does society feel?
If you are talking about a State, that is entirely different. I know in the US we have a system called the Judiciary system that clearly states the conditions of execution. No one in the US can take the law into his own hands and kill whom ever he chooses despite the fact it might be God given. And further more, people do think that execution is murder. Now if we had a king that would go around executing people for his own selfish terms, would you support this? I would assume you would think of that as murder as well.
And yes, people do in fact seek vengeance on executioners. Not as you described it. Imagine if someone held false witness to your father/mother that she murdered someone and she was executed on those grounds. You would probably be anger at the person who accused your father/mother, that person who held the false witness just served as an executioner.
I'm saying that death or anger shouldn't be quenched with more death. I wouldn't for one kill anyone, not Hitler, not Satan, for you cannot battle such evils with evil; that only breeds excuse for more evil. (certainly 2 wrongs don't make a right) I for one would use other means to obtain the plates, through cunning or percerverence. God gave me things like logic and empathy, I tend to use them. If God wants me to kill, he would have to do way with those for I will not throw them away on my own.
-
Considering that God didn't command Hitler to kill the Jews then no, it isn't.
The signs were there that the Jews were going to suffer some pretty horrible things not that the Gentiles should crack to it and get it happening.
How do you know if you can reason with me or not? You haven't even tried. Instead of actually discussing the topic we get Ad Hominem goodness.
[Aside] That may be the fastest I've seen Godwin's Law come to fruition. [/Aside]
Ok, so you got me on the Hitler thing, primarily because you, just as me, don't know if God told Hitler to kill the Jews. But we do know that Hitler was born on God's green earth. And if it's not Hitler, so other people. That woman who drowned her kids and Islamic extremist and in some ways, perhaps the Pope in regards to the crusades, were told by God which allowed them to do what they did.
And to say there were signs doesn't make it right nor does it leave an excuse for Hitler for committing such acts.
You've already made your stance. That a heart attack is no different than murder (whether it's God given or not). Any attempt to say that a heart attack, which isn't preplanned, whose ramifications are not under the Commandments or the Law. Look, a heart attack has no intentions, while a guy with a sword has intentions and motives. There is a different. No one can blame a heart attack and some how seek vengeance against a heart attack, and a heart attack can't go to jail for it's actions. And there is NO LAW any where in the world or in existence that deems a heart attack illegal.
-
Can God murder? He's the one who pronounced the sentence, not Nephi.
Edit: Edited for obvious guilt of begging the question.
He did, through Nephi. Just like he'll use people (like Mother Teresa or Amulek if you want a BoM example) to bless people, he'll use people to punish people. Look at all the slaying the Isrealites did upon entering Caanan under his express command. Saul got in trouble for sparing livestock and a king (whom Sammuel upon finding out hacked to pieces, the king that is). Of course he'll also use people to punish people not through his express command, such as the Assyrians, in that case he just let them do what they wanted and didn't protect the Kingdom of Isreal. I look at the colonization of American the same way, it wasn't God's express command in that case that we be nasty to them he just didn't intervene.
Vengence is mine, saith the Lord. It isn't limited to vulcanos and hurricanes.
Edit: Not saying slaughtering the natives wasn't a sin, as it wasn't an express command it was.
Probably, but it wouldn't have made Nephi figure out just how strong his resolution to follow the commandments he's been given even if he doesn't like them actually was though.
How is it more excusable if God kills with a heart attack verses a servant? If we accept the idea that God can meet out the death sentence how is not so relevant. I don't see the huge difference between a heart attack and Nephi. God commanded and was obeyed, in one case by Nephi in the other by Laban's heart. The end result is Laban dead by God's command, and if it is God's command you can't blame the Spirit for carrying that command and Nephi can't really be deemed immoral for following God's commands. Well, I suppose he could but not in a Judeo-Christian sense because not obeying God is immoral.
Of course wether Nephi was actually commanded or not is a whole 'nother discussion.
So many problems with this post. To say that God did the killing through Nephi is like saying that Hitler killed the Jews through God. I wasn't there in history in both cases, but just as the voices told Nephi to kill Laban, the signs were there for Hitler to kill the Jews (Hitler was a bit of a mystic).
And really? You don't think there is a difference between a heart attack and actual murder? I see that you have no conception of morality. And I also see that I can't even reason with you, nor will I.
-
If you could go back in time and meet Aldoph Hitler and carry a gun, would you pull the trigger?
Yes I did read the whole thing and saying that killing a man to save a thousand is hardly an excuse for murder. That is how suicide bombers reason for their actions. And no, I wouldn't kill Hitler, the death of Hitler would only send a message to the rest of the German society as well as Nazi sympathizers that the world was against Hitler's dream. Hitler may have even been materialized as a kind of prophet or martyr. And his second in command, possibly Himmler who was possibly more fanatical, would possible seize the opportunity in order to grab more land or even scape goat that it was the Jews who plotted the death of Hitler because Hitler spoke the truth. The Jews killed Christ because Christ spoke the truth, why couldn't they make the same claim for Hitler?
Second of all, it wasn't Hitler that was necessary for the Nazi party. He was just at the right places at the right time. It could have been anybody who wanted to do so. We've seen historically fascist regimes that have been built by particularly nobodies. Mussolini and Saddam were again nobodies in their birthright. Yet the conditions they lived in, and their passion accelerated them to the positions they held.
I don't know how much this is troubling me, that the Holy Ghost of all things would tell Nephi, who is righteous, to kill. Even if he didn't obtain the brass plates, like someone said "Truth cannot be destroyed, just buried or forgotten." If this is so, then the plates would somehow come to pass regardless if Nephi obtained them. And couldn't God have done the slaying? A simple heart attack can suffice.
-
Here the Spirit asks Nephi to slay Laban. Why would a good spirit do such a thing?
-
as a PERSON.. a HUMAN.. this bothers me! And honestly - it SHOULD bother you...everyone.
Its like saying people with dark hair cant have fun... or blonde people are stupid... or tall people cant be graceful... or even attacking a religion.
I would say to those who look at others that are not "ideal" in YOUR OPINION... I'm absolutely gonna LOVE listening to you try to explain yourself on judgement day - but I didnt MEAN to call them FAT... if they had only LOVED you more they would have eatten carrots instead of fries....
Well are you having fun? As long as you are having "fun" then it doesn't make sense to say that you aren't having fun? You are only causing problems for yourself, you are letting the ignorant people get to you.
-
The problem is marriage. When society refuses to uphold and support the concept of a lifelong marriage (as a minimum) with real commitment to family; every ill of society will continue to multiple until that society suffers collapse. Providing money, food and shelter will remain temporary solutions until permeate families has privilege place and status in society.
Until we take family seriously – as the only means by which a next generation can survive and overcome the stupidity of selfish greed and selfish need and replace that greed and self need with respect for marriage and family you will only mask the cause and treat a symptom.
The Traveler
I fail to see how martial problems can lead to world hunger. And as for the knowledge of God, I don't think that may even solve anything. If anything, it might cause more problems than it can solve. Max Weber talks about Christian ethics and how it only complicates things.
World peace can come to the masses, and it will be hard. Peace through diplomacy, through aid, through hope doesn't exist. Peace isn't a peace of paper that says one country will not attack another. Nor is it feeding the hunger. Nor is it praying for one nation to overcome. We have seen all these examples turn into violent wars. No, peace is actually a state of mind. If the world can achieve inner peace, then peace and the metta and compassion that follows will seep into this world. if you want to conquer all that is evil in this world, first you must conquer yourself. And from what I've seen, so very few people have done this.
-
Can you explain this question? I don't understand it. What does being a Mormon have to do with the issue of being fat and happy?
I say this because I hear some Mormons say that my beliefs are not "complete" because of the absence of God and Jesus Christ. However, in this case, my beliefs are complete. In Buddhism, you learn so much about the ignorance of people and how to deflect it. I've written this story before.
In Buddhism, it's required that people who join the Order [sangha] must beg for food. People are not obligated to give them alms, but they do so just as some one donates in the collection plate.
In a village where the Buddha was collecting his alms, a row of people gathered as to put food in the begging bowl of the wandering monks. However one man entered the line not to give alms.
When the Buddha reached the man, the man verbally abused the Buddha scolding, "I hear you are wise. What's a wise man doing begging for table scraps? If you are wise, you would get a job like the rest of us instead of free loading. Why don't you say something wise unless you are indeed a fool?"
The Buddha asked "If you present a gift to someone who refuses to accept your gift; to whom does the gift belong to?"
The man replied, "To him who gifted the present. Why?"
The Buddha cunningly responded, "Then I refuse your gift of abuse, for now you shall receive it back." He got many dirty looks from the villagers immediately afterwards.
There is a saying about ignorance (specifically revenge), ignorance is like a hot coal you are about to chuck at someone. You also get burned in the process. The Buddha taught so much about keeping your mind on your own faults, not the faults of others.
A friend was telling me about this girl who he said was "unattractive, yet luring" at the same time. He asked me if going out with her would tarnish his record of only being with attractive women, or that his friends will make fun of him for being with her. I told him that when people see you with her, they don't see you and an unattractive girl, all they see is that you are happy and that they are happy, and if you are happy enough, people will resent you for being happy instead of resenting you for being with an unattractive girl.
Just be happy.
-
Dukkha being understood as "suffering"? I am not completely familiar with the word and want to make sure I understand how you are using it.
I used Dukkha because it doesn't only incorporate the idea of suffering but also discontent and over all unhappiness. It has close ties to ignorance. So I'm saying that don't let other people's ignorance make you unhappy, because they themselves are unhappy, which is perhaps why they are ignorant in the first place. Scapegoating.
-
I'm for assisted suicide
-
No, I think Wingnut is saying that as an overweight person this bothers her.
I'm saying that this shouldn't bother her. She's not unhealthy, she's not sick, being other weight doesn't hinder anything she wants to do, she's not being discriminated agianst (in a segregation context) so in the end this shouldn't bother her. She shouldn't bother in the ignorance of others. Other's dukkha shouldn't be her dukkha.
-
What kind of question is that?
One that ends in a question mark?
-
I'm sitting here listening to Elder Uchtdorf's talk, while catching up on threads (I'm been out of town for a week). I just finished reading yet another thread on fat people, and why they apparently suck. Someone mentioned that fat women shouldn't just be content, but that they could be happy all the time.
I'm so sick of hearing that. I'm overweight. I'm not fat. I'm heavier than "ideal" but I am not disgusting.
I'm not content with my weight, but I am very happy in life.
As I closed the window, I heard Elder Uchtdorf say "the Gospel of Jesus Christ brings true happiness." The timing was perfect.
Why can't a person be fat and still be happy? Why are those mutually exclusive? Any number of descriptives could replace the word "fat" in that sentence.
What makes YOU happy? Is it looking in the mirror every day and saying "Dang, I look gooooood!"? Is it having a great house? Is it your family? Is it the Gospel?
If it's the mirror option, good for you. But I would suggest that perhaps your priorities are out of line. If it's a house, I wonder why. Is it because you are able to shelter and provide for your family, and able to serve others as your needs are met? Or is it just because it's bigger than the neighbor's house?
I am happy because I have a good life. I have an absolutely wonderful and amazing husband who treats me like a daughter of God. When he finds fault with me, he helps me to correct my behaviors in a way that will be beneficial to us both. I have a beautiful daughter who teaches me everyday about unconditional love. I have the Gospel in my life, and a knowledge of eternal families and eternal life. I have a best friend who is truly a blessing in my life. I laugh, I love, I learn. All these things make me happy.
To those who think that fat people aren't or can't be happy, I say this to you: we have had enough. Get off our backs.
As a mormon, this bothers you?
-
Believe it or not, we are constantly deceived. We often name things as ours, but they aren't really ours. We often think that some people might be right while others are wrong, and so forth. As for temptations again, we are always tempted. Why do you have a job, and why did you choose that job? Is it not for temptation for a better life? Or for benefits or your "interest"? These are all temptations of the body and mind. I am reluctant to think that God punishes, I believe that a person therefor punishes themselves.
-
If you know something is true, you don't believe it's true, you know it. It's not possible to know something you believe is true.
(I wish all Mormons understood that - but many of us don't.)
"Its not possible to know something you believe is true" Then where does faith come in? Ever heard of Fermat's Last Theorem?
-
One thing we learn from the Book of Mormon is that the true religion's greatest threat is Pride not outside dominance.
The Traveler
I've spoken with a lot of people and I can see that they have pride in their own beliefs. Isn't saying "I know what I believe is true" some form of pride?
God by Numbers
in General Discussion
Posted
This is a good joke, but I should have said derivation rather than derivative. Where does heaven come from? Where does God come from?
I'm making a case for the law of conservation of matter/mass. If you have a 1 loaf of bread and few fish, you cannot divide that among a group where the output does not equal the input. Where does he get the extra matter?