Hey Rameumptom, Thanks again for raising your concerns about the quality of our site. I'll try to address your points as I see them. "If you do not provide some form of editing on your list, you leave people to presume that all put in place is official." Yes, as I said earlier, there will be a screening process. Also, each talk will be open for commenting underneath, so zealous posters like yourself have the ability to respond to talks with any concerns you feel are worth mentioning. "Regardless of whether you make some claim that these are just from members, the issues will spring up." I suppose we'll just have to disagree here: there aren't really any premises for me to respond to, just claims. "Without an editor (bishop in the case of Sacrament) to ensure doctrines are taught properly, etc., you will end up with a hodgepodge of garbage with pearls strewn in the midst of it. It won't be worth dumpster diving in hopes of finding the really good stuff." At this point, I feel it only fair to defend that mass of members you've just insulted. I suppose, in the end, I regard the work of bulk of LDS as more than "a hodgepodge of garbage." Again, we'll just have to disagree here. "Even if the talks are doctrinally correct, does not mean they are inspired or inspiring." I think many would simply contend that-- as the doctrine is inspired/inspiring-- recreations that adhere to its premises (or are, as you say "doctrinally correct") will likewise be able to do little or no harm. Likewise, I'm sure you wouldn't pretend to be of the opinion that all talks inspire with similar results for a diverse crowd of people. I imagine that you've been inspired by work that has done little for others, and vice-versa. "I think a study of D&C 50 would be useful to you in this regard." A great verse, and a great place to direct future patrons of our site! Thanks! "The MoreGoodFoundation spends lots of effort on this forum, chat rooms, websites, etc to ensure the validity and correctness of the info found. I have no doubt they would manage such an issue well." Well, surely none of us can argue this point! However, I would direct you to the duration of time the MoreGoodFoundation has taken thus far in creating their version of our site: From the posts I've seen, it looks as though the issue has lain dormant for the last 8 months. If nothing else, perhaps our site will "inspire" them to continue with such an important endeavor! "Since I don't know you or your friends, don't know how well any of you know the gospel, don't know how well you will review talks, etc., I can't say whether it will be a quality site or not." From your responses so far, I think you already HAVE said what you think the site will be (or, in the very least, certainly insinuated as much). Regardless, we'll certainly be looking to win you over with quality content in the next few months. Thanks again, Rameumptom! Please feel free to get back to us with more brainstorming! It's posts like this that help us build a better, more accurate user experience!