kevinpeter

Several early Church leaders, most notably Brigham Young, taught that in a complete theocracy the Lord could require the voluntary shedding of a murderer's blood—presumably by capital punishment—as part of the process of Atonement for such grievous sin. This was referred to as "blood Atonement." Since such a theocracy has not been operative in modern times, the practical effect of the idea was its use as a rhetorical device to heighten the awareness of Latter-day Saints of the seriousness of murder and other major sins. This view is not a doctrine of the Church and has never been practiced by the Church at any time. Early anti-Mormon writers charged that under Brigham Young the Church practiced "blood Atonement," by which they meant Church-instigated violence directed at dissenters, enemies, and strangers. This claim distorted the whole idea of blood atonement—which was based on voluntary submission by an offender—into a supposed justification of involuntary punishment. Occasional isolated acts of violence that occurred in areas where Latter-day Saints lived were typical of that period in the history of the American West, but they were not instances of Church-sanctioned blood Atonement.

Luke 15:1-10 [1] Now the tax collectors and "sinners" were all gathering around to hear him. [2] But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law muttered, "This man welcomes sinners and eats with them." [3] Then Jesus told them this parable: [4] "Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Does he not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? [5] And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders [6] and goes home. Then he calls his friends and neighbors together and says, 'Rejoice with me; I have found my lost sheep.' [7] I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.

his is the question that keeps popping up in the minds of thousands of married men and women. The truth is that it is possible to save your marriage however difficult it may seem to you. Are you trying everything possible in your hands to save your marriage at any cost? You are not alone. With passing years and the responsibilities of managing a household and bringing up children most couples find it difficult to spend time for themselves or to nurture their intimacy and romance. But things like financial problems, drug or alcohol addiction, infidelity and aloofness can be more threatening your marriage than issues like boredom or neglect. But if it has already happened and there is no effort on your spouse to repair the damage, you may feel that it may finally damage your marriage irreparably. If you have tried to make your spouse see reason by sincerely trying to follow the advice from friends, relatives and on the brink of giving up, stop and think. Professional marriage counselors can help though their success rate is not so encouraging. But some spouses flatly refuse to go for counseling and if that is your situation, do not lose heart, there is still hope. The fact is, all marriage problems can be resolved regardless of how complicated it is. The truth is now you have help at hand - expert counseling and advice with proven techniques to save any failing marriage is within your reach. Never make the mistake of handling everything by trial and error and risk a divorce. Do yourself a favor by getting yourself the best practical help before it is too late.