dontunderstand

Just want to out out there that sometimes it seems everyone is so into protecting the sinner we forget about the innocent spouse and children. This is a man who was a returned missionary who made temple covenants. I do not think breaking those covenants should be taken so lightly. If it is not a big deal to break them then why have them. Yea I get it he is a liar and a manipultor and it wants to be said well there is nothing that can be done if he lies. Well what about protecting the next victim. The affair was admitted to so they have enough. A child is left fatherless crying everyday. Is that not important too? And by the way what is the point of a disciplinary council that does not hold these priesthood holders accountable? This man has never been held accountable by anyone. Thank goodness at least after this life he will. There is nothing wrong with expecting priesthood authority to hold the wicked accountable. So may this never happen to your daughter or grandchild.

In answer to the questions I think it is easy for all to say she doesn't need to know. But since they were not divorced until long after the sin it would seem at the time she should have known. Also, it appears nothing was done. And I think it just makes her feel that where was the church for her. He does not provide all the financial support mandated in the divorce either. And what about the ordinaces for the child that will be done in the future. Shouldn't she know if he is not to give blessings and perform ordinances? He did participate in ordinances already when he was not supposed to. This is not meant to bring negative comments toward the church or anything of the sort. Just a question on if this is policy or a case by case basis?

Why does the spouse not allowd to know the disciplinary action taken against husband who had an affair? She ended up divorcing him finally but was not able to know what if any action was taken by the church even though she is still sealed to him and caring for their child.