bcoyer

what about this then, the defendant clearly stated "It's the cost of doing business". Meaning he knew it was wrong, he did it anyway because he has the millions to get him out of it.

Mahone: You are correct if it was a case of a few missing chromosomes. But in this instance, it is not the case. Anyone that would commit a sexual harassment crime could be considered "mentally ill". Deborah: He is not a public defender.

I guess I was wrong in assuming guilt from the prior 2 convictions/settlements. It is possible the third time he is innocent, but come on. Mohone: Level of Guilt? I don't understand that point of view. There is no grey area. Either you did it or you didn't. There is no, "He did it, but it really wasnt that bad". Im just thinking this LDS bishop's main source of income is this repeat offender with a lot of money and it's just not right for him to try and continue to bail him out of trouble. If I am wrong, than I apologize.

My question is: Can a LDS Bishop, whom is a lawyer, represent a multiple time sexual harassment offender? I guess it may be just for the money.