It's interesting that you mention this. The marginal commentary in the New Oxford Annotated Bible for Genesis 3:1-24 states:Though this story is often taken by Christians as an account of "original sin," the word "sin" never occurs in it. Instead, it describes how the maturing of humans into civilized life involved damage of connection established in 2.4-25 between the LORD God, man, woman, and earth. 1: This characterization (Now the serpent was more crafty than any other wild animal that the LORD God had made) of the snake emphasizes his wise craftiness (Heb "'arum"), a characteristic that contrasts with the innocent nakedness ("'arum") of the man and woman. Snakes were a symbol in the ancient world of wisdom, fertility, and immortality. Only later was the snake in this story seen as the devil. The woman sees that the pleasant fruit of the tree is desirable to make one wise; she eats it and shares it with her husband. The result is enlightenment, the eyes of both were opened. Such wisdom takes them from the unashamed nakedness of before (2.25) to clothing, a mark of civilization in nonbiblical primeval narratives.