bytor2112 Posted May 5, 2009 Report Posted May 5, 2009 The $328,835 snapshots of an Air Force One backup plane buzzing lower Manhattan last week will not be shown to the public, the White House said yesterday.Read if you care..... Quote
mlbrowninwa Posted May 5, 2009 Report Posted May 5, 2009 No surprise there. That was an expensive photo. I hope it turned out nice. Quote
Maxel Posted May 5, 2009 Report Posted May 5, 2009 Wow... Just... wow. Irresponsibility meets a new height, with the President- who should be shouldering the blame instead of claiming "I didn't know, not my fault!"- leading the charge. What I want to know is- why not? Would it be more bad publicity and we see- once again- the administration playing the popularity gambit? I'd trade all the pictures and videos of the First Dog for these photos any day. I want to know who was on that plane, who ordered the photo-op, and the corresponding "why's" to both those questions. Quote
DigitalShadow Posted May 5, 2009 Report Posted May 5, 2009 I think it was a stupid stunt and a waste of money. But in the grand scheme of stupid stunts and wastes of money by political figures, I don't think it particularly stands out or is even noteworthy other than the fact that it scared the crap out of a bunch of New Yorkers thinking it was another attack. Quote
Maxel Posted May 5, 2009 Report Posted May 5, 2009 I think it was a stupid stunt and a waste of money. But in the grand scheme of stupid stunts and wastes of money by political figures, I don't think it particularly stands out or is even noteworthy other than the fact that it scared the crap out of a bunch of New Yorkers thinking it was another attack.True, it's not as bad as starting a war with nor tangible enemy, or even going on a spending spree that will ruin the economy and country. It's still a bad stunt though. And I think scaring hundreds (thousands?) of U.S. citizens needlessly is pretty bad in its own right. This is a chance for the Administration to own up to a relatively minor mistake- yet we see no one doing that. The buck gets passed around until we don't know who's at fault.The result is no one really has to shoulder the responsibility and America forgets about it. Quote
DigitalShadow Posted May 5, 2009 Report Posted May 5, 2009 True, it's not as bad as starting a war with nor tangible enemy, or even going on a spending spree that will ruin the economy and country. It's still a bad stunt though. And I think scaring hundreds (thousands?) of U.S. citizens needlessly is pretty bad in its own right. This is a chance for the Administration to own up to a relatively minor mistake- yet we see no one doing that. The buck gets passed around until we don't know who's at fault.The result is no one really has to shoulder the responsibility and America forgets about it.I definitely think that the scaring of citizens was far worse than the spending, but the shifting of blame is just politics and human nature. I see crap like that every day at my workplace. People are out for blood right now and want to jump on any little mistake, it would be political suicide for someone to take full responsibility and no one is willing to fall on their sword. Not that it's an excuse for not doing the right thing, but it's just not surprising to me. Quote
Just_A_Guy Posted May 11, 2009 Report Posted May 11, 2009 They've released what they claim is "the photo".The evidence strongly suggests that they're lying. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.