Just_A_Guy

Senior Moderator
  • Content Count

    13259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

Just_A_Guy last won the day on May 23

Just_A_Guy had the most liked content!

3 Followers

About Just_A_Guy

  • Rank
    Senior Moderator
  • Birthday December 2

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Utah County, Utah, USA
  • Religion
    LDS

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Not quite sure I’m following your logical implications here. Are you suggesting that Joseph Smith’s testimony of the Book of Mormon is true (because he had witnesses; but his testimony of seeing Jesus (the first time) isn’t because there was no additional witness? Are you suggesting that Smith was telling the truth *part* of the time, but not *all* of the time? Pardon, but you seem to be throwing out semi-random factoids and scriptural passages without tying them into a comprehensive theory or argument here; so it’s hard for me to know what your overall point is.
  2. Just_A_Guy

    Leviticus 21:16-23

    Ok, thanks for clarifying. I guess my response would that priestly temple worship in Mosaic times had a very theatrical element to it—you didn’t do it primarily for your own spiritual benefit; you did it to create a spectacle for others that they would find edifying. Having a priest who was known to be physically imperfect, in that role; would be rather like having a white actress playing Aida (in Aida), or a white actor playing Jim (in The Adventures of Huck Finn), or a ripped 6’5”, 300 lb guy playing young Cosette (in Les Miserables)—it undermines the spectacle and emotional punch that the drama’s creators are trying to create.
  3. Just_A_Guy

    Leviticus 21:16-23

    I wonder whether we’re reading it the same way. I read it as saying that people with a variety of physical characteristics/“deformities” were ineligible for temple service. Are you reading it differently?
  4. Just_A_Guy

    Hi, In need of intellectual stimulation

    @pam, how on earth did we wind up with a silly name like “Third Hour”, when “Latter-day Love Boat” was readily available?
  5. Just_A_Guy

    Fun thought on Urim and Thummim/Seer Stones

    I’ve heard that this sort of thing may be less than a generation off. Fascinating stuff . . .
  6. Just_A_Guy

    Thoughts on Pioneer Temple renovations

    That’s interesting. I believe we’ve heard several articles/talks about the “temple standard” approach to construction. Do you have some examples?
  7. Just_A_Guy

    Living the Law of Consecration fully

    Pooh. Defining and then helping the poor, isn’t nearly as fun as the adrenaline rush of phony virtue that comes from hurting the rich.
  8. Just_A_Guy

    History Buff's

    For “medicinal purposes”, of course!
  9. Just_A_Guy

    History Buff's

    IIRC it was finally made a universal precondition to temple admittance by the Grant administration in the 1920s or 1930s. But it had been enforced intermittently before then. It was, I believe, one of the grounds for David Whitmer’s excommunication back in 1838; and I think it was emphasized pretty hard during the “reformation” of 1856.
  10. Just_A_Guy

    Living the Law of Consecration fully

    I think there are a couple of issues here. —First, you quite missed my point. A critical means of blessing the whole human race, is by bringing more of those humans to earth. If, as many self-proclaimed would-be consecrationists would have me believe, the Church has no right to tell me what an appropriate family size is; how can they nevertheless demand that the Church presume to tell me what an appropriate definition of fiscal “surplus” is? —Second, vis a vis the Joseph Smith quote—you seem to assume that a person not living the United Order outside her own family sphere, is not finding ways of blessing people outside her own immediate family. What, I wonder, do you make of the fact that Joseph Smith lived in one of the the most opulent homes in Nauvoo? —And third, as a general proposition you seem to conflate “loving” or “blessing”, with “giving lots of free stuff to”.
  11. Just_A_Guy

    Living the Law of Consecration fully

    How about, when I got my living-ordinance recommend to be sealed to my wife? I don’t know about other folks, but I already live the law of consecration—with my wife and six kiddies. Granted, I went into that arrangement thinking more about what I’d give than what I’d get (or the come-down my undeserving fiancée would get when she had to give up the independence and self-sufficiency which were clearly someone else’s birthright). But I imagine that if I’d gone into the arrangement with either of the latter two attitudes, I wouldn’t have been spiritually ready to enter into a consecrated order at all. We have recently had some interesting conversations here about how it’s no one’s business how many children a sealed couple brings into their own miniature United Order. Why, then, is it suddenly everybody’s business if a Mormon family declines to sell itself into a pseudo-United Order built, of necessity, upon Telestial principles?
  12. Just_A_Guy

    1 in 4 Women have abortions

    Seen on Facebook:
  13. Just_A_Guy

    1 in 4 Women have abortions

    I don’t see a source linked. Are they counting as “abortions”, a post-miscarriage D&C? Because my wife has had two of those . . . Also, on declining rates: IIRC there are also studies suggesting that people these days, and especially kids, are just plain having less sex. All that said, though: this ranks up there with the CDC’s stat that 100 million Americans have an STD. It’s easy to forget just how ripe for the burning our homeland has become.
  14. Just_A_Guy

    Thoughts on Pioneer Temple renovations

    @jerome1232, see 5:24 of this video: