Recommended Posts

Posted

There are some interesting commentaries in there. I didn't read everything, but just looking at some of the "canonical" writings that are in our current Bible:

They claim that 2 Peter is the "newest" of eveything in the Bible, and clearly couldn't have been written by Peter. Their discussion of this book even seemed to have the tone of "should it even have been canonized?"

The authorship of many books seems to be in question.

It would appear that some of Paul's writings are the oldest we have.

Of the gospels, Mark is the oldest written. Matthew seems to borrow from Mark, suggesting that the four gospels aren't necessarily independent accounts.

On the other hand, considering that we are trying to go back 2000 years to recreate what happened, it is remarkable that we have anything at all.

My comments are probably only worth $0.02, but there they are.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...