What a great explanation by Joseph McConkie! I just wish people on this post would read it before commenting on it. :)
Mikbone, I honestly can't imagine Joseph McConkie EVER saying that there is nothing literal to the story. I have taken every class he offered (twice!) and I have read all of his books and I have ALWAYS heard him state that the story is both literal and figurative (which is his point in the chapter quoted above, if you bothered to read it). You are misrepresenting Joseph McConkie, pitting the McConkie you think you remember with the one quoted above and, strangely, there are some that believe your version over the actual statement (I am talking about you, Hemidakota).
Hemidakota, McConkie is NOT saying that the garden wasn't a literal place, read the quote again. He is saying that there are figurative elements to the story. Do you really think Jospeh McConkie doesn't know about Jackson Missouri?!
Moksha, theologically Adam and Christ are inseparabely tied. To make Adam a myth is to make Christ a myth. This is something Joseph McConkie, his father Bruce R McConkie, and his grandfather Joseph Fielding Smith have all passionately defended.
Sorry, if my post sounds angry, I just really love this man and consider him the greatest teacher I have ever had. I don't mind people disagreeing with him but I do not appreciate people misrepresenting him.
Brother McConkie is teaching that that the garden of Eden was a temple for Adam and Eve and therefore, like the temple, there are elements of the story that are meant to teach us symbolically.