rynebs

I realize this is a pretty old thread, but just a thought, all of the info we currently believe and subscribe to on these issues is based on our acceptance of certain translations, which we've already seen argued in this thread, and throughout many readings, could all these different language and religious veiws have all these differing and unclear interpretaions because the translations we've subsribed to as a society was alwats wrong to begin with? Hypothetically, lets take John C. Allegro's Copper Scroll translations, the only scroll to be translated within the deadline and not collaborated on by multiple vatican priests for an extra 10 years as the others were, and apply them to all the writings as well as other untranscribale artifacts found around the world, lets say using his translations we are able to decipher what these say and retranslating other writings reveals a much clearer, more sensible/scientific view rather than magical/fantasy that is kind of the bible now, i think at that point most people would have to agree that perhaps what we are told is true, isn't.