Ok, I just read the post since last night and I need to clarify some things, my friend isn't as angry as you think he his, and he's not going to waste his time in legal action against the church, I was just stating how he felt about being lied to by a Bishop. I won't comment on every assumption that people have made here on this thread, but I will say that it is very sad that the church is doing the opposite of what they teach. Rather than make the baptism of his children a positive spiritual experience, they decided to do it in secret, thus making it a strong point of contention between all parties, helping the parents to fight about such spiritual things isn't right (IMO). My friend has never been against the church or having his kids attend church, he simply wanted to be able to be there when his kids where baptized, in fact he told the bishop that he would like to baptize them himself, and rather then help him to make the choices necessary to have that happen... well, I guess if someone is on the fence about their believes in the church and everything, you should just push them off, after all we don't actually need people with problems in this church anyway do we, people that are on the fence just don't belong to the fold, so it's best a Bishop just go ahead and do something to really turn those kind of people away for good...(Yes, I am being sarcastic, it's in my nature) I guess, I'm upset, not that his kids are baptized but that it has been such a negative thing, I was really hoping to have this be a positive thing for this family.