Just_A_Guy Posted February 18, 2009 Report Posted February 18, 2009 I can see doing it if the force is used to militarize our borders and have our international sea and airports crawling with M-16-toting security officers with search dogs. But otherwise . . . worrisome. Quote
hordak Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 *nods* I've been over there twice already (Reserves). The guard is funded/run by the state but isn't the Reserves federal? Quote
Guest Godless Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 The guard is funded/run by the state but isn't the Reserves federal?Yes. But with our forces stretched so thin, Reserve and Active components have to be ready for domestic missions in addition to overseas deployments. For example, there were several Reserve and AD soldiers sent to Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina in '05 because there weren't enough Guard soldiers to do all the work that needed to be done. Quote
hordak Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 Yes. But with our forces stretched so thin, Reserve and Active components have to be ready for domestic missions in addition to overseas deployments. For example, there were several Reserve and AD soldiers sent to Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina in '05 because there weren't enough Guard soldiers to do all the work that needed to be done.I can see how the Reserves can be helpful at home when the guard is stretched thin (like your example) but if it isn't the primary mission the Reservists really should be surprised or upset by their deployments.( not saying you are personally) Quote
Hemidakota Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 According to the latest scoop, isn't Obama increasing the size of the military force? Quote
hordak Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 According to the latest scoop, isn't Obama increasing the size of the military force?Maybe it's a part of the recovery effort? Giving more people more jobs. Of course if we pull out or reduce the troops serving in Iraq/ Afghanistan while increasing the size of the military "they" will have to find some reason to justify the added expense. Quote
Guest Godless Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 I can see how the Reserves can be helpful at home when the guard is stretched thin (like your example) but if it isn't the primary mission the Reservists really should be surprised or upset by their deployments.( not saying you are personally)No, it doesn't bother me. As a Reservist, my primary job is to supplement Active forces overseas and Guard forces at home. What bothers me is the fact that our obligations abroad are stretching us horribly thin. As of right now, we don't have the manpower to respond to any major situations that may arise either at home or abroad. Quote
hordak Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 No, it doesn't bother me. As a Reservist, my primary job is to supplement Active forces overseas and Guard forces at home. What bothers me is the fact that our obligations abroad are stretching us horribly thin. As of right now, we don't have the manpower to respond to any major situations that may arise either at home or abroad.That's a good assessment. So are you in favor of the increase in troops? Quote
Guest Godless Posted February 19, 2009 Report Posted February 19, 2009 That's a good assessment. So are you in favor of the increase in troops?Yes, though I'm curious as to how they're going to do it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.