Nottingham Posted May 5, 2005 Report Posted May 5, 2005 Charles A Walker, a faithful Saint, recorded the following in his diary: "Sun., Nov. 21, 1880....Bro. Milo Andress...Spoke of blessings and power of God manifested in the Kirtland Temple. Said he once asked the Prophet [why] he [Milo, himself] did not feel that power that was spoken of as 'the power that was felt on the Day of Pentacost'....[but] when we had fasted for 24 hours and had partaken of the Lord's supper, namely a piece of bread as big as your double fist and half a pint of wine in the temple, I was there and saw the Holy Ghost descend upon the heads of those present like cloven tongues of fire." (Diary of Charles L. Walker, 1855-1902)The statement by [Apostle] George A. Smith would also lead a person to believe that wine was used to excess: "...after the people had fasted all day, they sent out and got wine and bread...they ate and drank... some of the High Counsel of Missouri stepped [onto] the stand, and, as righteous Noah did when he awoke from his wine, commenced to curse their enemies." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p.216In a statement dated February 27, 1885, Mrs. Alfred Morley charged: "I have heard many Mormons who attended the dedication, or endowment of the Temple, say that very many became drunk...The Mormon leaders would stand up to prophesy and were so drunk they said that they could not get it out, and would call for another drink. Over [ie, more than] a barrel of liquor was used at the service." (Naked Truths About Mormonism, Oakland, Calif., April, 1888, p.2)Isaac Aldrich said that his brother "Hazen Aldrich, who was president of the Seventies. told me [that] when thetemple was dedicated a barrel of wine was used and they had a drunken 'pow-wow'." (Ibid., p.3)Stephen A. Hart said that a Mormon by the name of McWhithey told him that "they passed the wine in pails sev-eral times to the audience, and each person drank as much as he chose from a cup. He said that it was mixedliquor, and he believed the Mormon leaders intended to get the audience under the influence of the mixed liquor,so they would believe it was the Lord's doings...When the liquor was repassed, Mr. McWhithey told them he hadendowment enough..." (Ibid., p.3)The reader will remember David Whitmer as one of the three witnesses of The Book of Mormon. He said that"there was no visitation" (The Des Moines Daily News, October 16, l886) William E. McLellin, who had served as an Apostle in the Mormon Church, commented: "As to the endowmentin Kirtland, I state positively, it was no endowment from God. Not only myself was not endowed, but noother man of the five hundred who was present --except it was with wine." (True Latter-Day Saints' Herald, XIX, 437)The fact that the Saints fasted for some time and then drank an excessive amount of wine probably led manyof them to curse their enemies and to believe [that] they had seen visions.HYPOCRISYOrson Pratt once quipped: "I do not wonder that the world say that the Latter-day Saints do not believe their ownrevelations. Why? Because we do not practice them." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 17, p.104)Caveat/commentary: To give Elder Orson Pratt "credit", though, it was his manner of talking and speaking thathe did not point the finger at others and say "YOU" are doing this or that: he would quite frequently use the word"we", even though he, himself, was not gulty of the thing he was trying to get across--what he wanted toemphasize.There are many, many more examples of hypocrisy in Church leadership, over their own non-compliance to theWord of Wisdom [for example] and to their own excesses...(More on this, at a later time) Quote
Dale Posted May 5, 2005 Report Posted May 5, 2005 Hi, It's to bad people had to lie in order to contradict true versions of the endowment. The endowment happened. I feel William Mclellin was a liar. So was David Whitmer. The only thing I trust him on was his testimony of the Book of Mormon. It's to bad they died as sinful men. The word od wisdom was not made mandetory in the LDS Church until after Joseph Smith Jr's death. I think it unfair to judge person's by rules not in effect at the time. The word of Wisdom was not given by commandment or restraint. Sincerely, Dale Quote
Nottingham Posted May 5, 2005 Author Report Posted May 5, 2005 Originally posted by Nottingham@May 4 2005, 11:32 PMCharles A Walker, a faithful Saint, recorded the following in his diary: "Sun., Nov. 21, 1880....Bro. Milo Andress...Spoke of blessings and power of God manifested in the Kirtland Temple. Said he once asked the Prophet [why] he [Milo, himself] did not feel that power that was spoken of as 'the power that was felt on the Day of Pentacost'....[but] when we had fasted for 24 hours and had partaken of the Lord's supper, namely a piece of bread as big as your double fist and half a pint of wine in the temple, I was there and saw the Holy Ghost descend upon the heads of those present like cloven tongues of fire." (Diary of Charles L. Walker, 1855-1902)The statement by [Apostle] George A. Smith would also lead a person to believe that wine was used to excess: "...after the people had fasted all day, they sent out and got wine and bread...they ate and drank... some of the High Counsel of Missouri stepped [onto] the stand, and, as righteous Noah did when he awoke from his wine, commenced to curse their enemies." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p.216In a statement dated February 27, 1885, Mrs. Alfred Morley charged: "I have heard many Mormons who attended the dedication, or endowment of the Temple, say that very many became drunk...The Mormon leaders would stand up to prophesy and were so drunk they said that they could not get it out, and would call for another drink. Over [ie, more than] a barrel of liquor was used at the service." (Naked Truths About Mormonism, Oakland, Calif., April, 1888, p.2)Isaac Aldrich said that his brother "Hazen Aldrich, who was president of the Seventies. told me [that] when thetemple was dedicated a barrel of wine was used and they had a drunken 'pow-wow'." (Ibid., p.3)Stephen A. Hart said that a Mormon by the name of McWhithey told him that "they passed the wine in pails sev-eral times to the audience, and each person drank as much as he chose from a cup. He said that it was mixedliquor, and he believed the Mormon leaders intended to get the audience under the influence of the mixed liquor,so they would believe it was the Lord's doings...When the liquor was repassed, Mr. McWhithey told them he hadendowment enough..." (Ibid., p.3)The reader will remember David Whitmer as one of the three witnesses of The Book of Mormon. He said that"there was no visitation" (The Des Moines Daily News, October 16, l886) William E. McLellin, who had served as an Apostle in the Mormon Church, commented: "As to the endowmentin Kirtland, I state positively, it was no endowment from God. Not only myself was not endowed, but noother man of the five hundred who was present --except it was with wine." (True Latter-Day Saints' Herald, XIX, 437)The fact that the Saints fasted for some time and then drank an excessive amount of wine probably led manyof them to curse their enemies and to believe [that] they had seen visions.HYPOCRISYOrson Pratt once quipped: "I do not wonder that the world say that the Latter-day Saints do not believe their ownrevelations. Why? Because we do not practice them." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 17, p.104)Caveat/commentary: To give Elder Orson Pratt "credit", though, it was his manner of talking and speaking thathe did not point the finger at others and say "YOU" are doing this or that: he would quite frequently use the word"we", even though he, himself, was not gulty of the thing he was trying to get across--what he wanted toemphasize.There are many, many more examples of hypocrisy in Church leadership, over their own non-compliance to theWord of Wisdom [for example] and to their own excesses...(More on this, at a later time)Caveat: It is not my intent, here, to cast a shadow on the character of LDS Church leaders of the present-day.The idea of "more later" involves talking about the seeming hypocrisies--you be the judge--of early Church leaderswho "said one thing but did another".If any, here, think that hypocrisy is an okay thing, you are free to feel and act in accordance with that belief: as for me and my house, it is not a good thing.So, in keeping with this [the above] perspective, I will--soon but not today--give answer to my own "more later" statement and discuss what Joseph Smith thought about the Word of Wisdom, either as just so much "greeting [and] not...commandment/restraint"; or, if in fact he did think differently than we give him credit for. Quote
Guest curvette Posted May 5, 2005 Report Posted May 5, 2005 I don't think that, at this time, the Word of Wisdom was a mandate. It had been given three years earlier as advice, but not commandment. I imagine that in 1836, there was still pretty widespread use (at least occasional) of all the things forbidden to the church now. I don't see this as a good example of hypocrisy. The thing that kind of annoys me about some of these quotes is that they insinuate that all the visions could be explained by alcohol consumption. They don't at all explain the miraculous claims of the days leading up to or following the "pentecost" where many visions were claimed (alcohol free.) There was also a rather large apostacy following the dedication festivities. I think many of the Priesthood holders felt kind of "shortchanged" because Joseph Smith had told them, " "I feel disposed to speak a few words more to you, my brethren, concerning the endowment: All who are prepared, and are sufficiently pure to abide the presence of the Savior, will see him in the solemn assembly." (DHC VII P 308-310)" So, anyone who didn't have these kinds of visions would automatically feel that they were not sufficiently pure or prepared. Talk about pressure! I can see why some might resort to drunkenness if they hadn't witnessed anything miraculous! Quote
Dale Posted May 6, 2005 Report Posted May 6, 2005 Hi, Although some denied an endowment occured it's their words against others. Sincerely, Dale Quote
Snow Posted May 6, 2005 Report Posted May 6, 2005 Originally posted by curvette@May 5 2005, 08:50 AM I don't think that, at this time, the Word of Wisdom was a mandate. It had been given three years earlier as advice, but not commandment. I imagine that in 1836, there was still pretty widespread use (at least occasional) of all the things forbidden to the church now. I don't see this as a good example of hypocrisy. Whoa there sister. Nottingham is trying to make a point. Please don't mess it up with clear-headed thinking. Quote
Guest curvette Posted May 6, 2005 Report Posted May 6, 2005 Originally posted by Snow@May 5 2005, 10:31 PM Wow there sister. Nottingham is trying to make a point. Please don't mess it up with clear-headed thinking. Oh, now I'm your sister? What happened to Veronica? Quote
Snow Posted May 7, 2005 Report Posted May 7, 2005 Originally posted by curvette+May 6 2005, 12:19 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (curvette @ May 6 2005, 12:19 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Snow@May 5 2005, 10:31 PM Wow there sister. Nottingham is trying to make a point. Please don't mess it up with clear-headed thinking. Oh, now I'm your sister? What happened to Veronica? Er, I thought Betty might be listening and I didn't want to cause a fuss. Quote
begood2 Posted May 7, 2005 Report Posted May 7, 2005 On American Movie Classics I saw a Veronica Lake that was a real knockout in her day! Quote
begood2 Posted May 7, 2005 Report Posted May 7, 2005 snow, I've always been courious about your avator clip. You have probably explained it several times, but I've missed it. Are you suggesting that some of these post are driving you to drink? When I read your post, I try not to look, but from the corner of my eye I keep seeing this bottle containing some red substance going to your lips. The strange thing is that the bottle never seems to empty. ps. please don't take offense, I know that curiosity killed the cat, but I'm just dying to know. I don't want the same fate however. Quote
Snow Posted May 7, 2005 Report Posted May 7, 2005 Originally posted by begood2@May 6 2005, 04:55 PM snow,I've always been courious about your avator clip. You have probably explained it several times, but I've missed it. Are you suggesting that some of these post are driving you to drink? No - though my posts might drive others to drink... like fish.It's Napolean Dynamite. Quote
begood2 Posted May 7, 2005 Report Posted May 7, 2005 Snow, OK, thanks~ I tried to crack a joke, but instead, I think my sheltered life is showing! Quote
Dale Posted May 7, 2005 Report Posted May 7, 2005 Hi, Snow I was drunk on critic's literature for awhile. I admit & had a problem & turned to Jesus for help. I am greatful I was able to stay out of the worse type of critic's attitudes. Sure there are problems with Mormonism but like this Word of Wisdom issue the issues not unresolveable. Critics point to things early LDS thought were official & forget official is not a final authority on matters. This is why heresies can appear in early LDS publications, but can be rejected by modern LDS. BY knew his successor would have as much authority as he did to define official LDS teaching. Sincerely, Dale Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.