CommanderSouth

Members
  • Posts

    227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by CommanderSouth

  1. Suzie may correct me, but my recollection is that the accounts for a couple of the miraculous incidents recounted in that movie are unreliable for a variety of reasons. My opinion is that when relating Church history to non-Mormons our facts must be above reproach; and that would be my primary concern with showing the movie to anyone. (Incidentally: it is known that some Mormon Battalion veterans were with Kearney when he cleaned up the Donner campsite and buried the corpses, but I don't believe we have any hard evidence that Savage himself was one of them.)

    I don't think that they would dig too deep into the history of it, so if there were liberties with details like the Donner party then that wouldn't be problematic. If some of the miracles are tenuous, then I am still in the clear, as I can say "we THINK" this happened, but this DEFINITELY happened" and get away with it.

    Thankfully for me, my parents are older and not inclined to dig this stuff up :)

  2. I picked up 17 miracles from Netflix and have been mulling about showing it to my non member parents. Ephraim's Rescue I think did a lot of good showing the power of God being in the church, I say this as my Mom commented on it,saying we used to be closer to God, or something like that.

    The thing I can't figure out though is if I should show the this one, especially given Richards and Willie's rebuke of Levi Savage, and then him being "vindicated" by so much hardship.

    I don't want to do more harm than good, but the miracles we pretty stirring, and that could be good, but I don't know if the tradeoff of blasting someone for disobedience is worth it.

    What do you all think?

    Thanks!

  3. Sometimes I wish I could be content to understand that it is probably not possible to see outside of our "box".

    But I sit here and try to figure out how God is either A) Always God, which seems to go against ye olde King Follet discourse, or B) Not always God and seems to not answer where everything came from.

    Any thoughts? I'd imaging "Deal with it" is nigh approaching :)

  4. Further we learn of Jesus praying for us to all be one even as He and The Father are one. Therefore I find it more than plausible that any number of Gods are one with each other and therefore just as accurately called God as opposed to Gods.

    After my little rambling I submit my answer to the original question of the priesthood being God's or Gods is YES.

    And when I think about the constructs in my own mind, I think this is the case. Just as we can/will be one with God and in that way will BE gods, we are still one. In this way, if there are other Gods they are still one, as it's simply what we become.

    Mind you all this does is shift the question of where we came from or where God came from up a level, but it does seem to work.

  5. I know I have at least touched on this idea before, but, what should I do to reconcile the spiritual experiences of others than run counter to my own?

    Example:

    My Brother (Pentecostal), describes experiences with the power of God, and the Holy Spirit, physical manifestations, also describes the same spirit telling him to stay away from the BoM.

    I know my brother, and in many ways he is like me, lived as a pentecostal for decades, had no real manifestations of the spirit in the way others around him did, and then BLAMO, feels the spirit physically manifested to him, and still pentecostal.

    I don't know what he felt, but I can't shrug it off like I can people I don't know, because I Know my brother and I know he wouldn't lie, this is the same situation I am in with my mother.

    What do you all think, where can I turn on this one?

    Thanks!

  6. How is it we believe in divorce when the NT seems to forbid it in cases of anything other than adultery?

    I did some digging for other topics but couldn't seem to find anything (or I don't know what to search for...)

    Thanks for the thoughts!

  7. That's probably right traveler, maybe, I have to work it out in my head, but it very well could be a fear of truth, or possibly since I want the church to be true, and all of it doesn't have answers that satiate me (or ones that I am fine having, but since I can't answer anyone else, it bothers me) makes me worry I am in fact afraid of the truth.

    I apologize, don't always articulate these feelings properly, especially when I don't understand exactly what they are myself...

  8. All of these comments help, I think I need to address some deficiencies in my own testimony before going too much further down these roads though. All additional insight is welcome though, and thanks to everyone so far! As always you guys are pretty Johnny on the spot to help me when questions come up and I run out of mormons to ask who will know what I am talking about :)

  9. "But you don't believe that Jesus gave us all that we need to be saved through his Apostles that he walked on Earth with. You believe what one man said 2000 years after Christ saved us by dying on the cross and leaving us His instructions. The Mormon religion adds to what the Bible says and that is just wrong."

    Doctrinally I don't know how to answer that given I don't fully know she. Each of the ordinances for exaltation were introduced and in which dispensation. What advice or scriptures can you all think of?

  10. Wouldn't that lead to a potential finite number of spirit children?

    I ask because, if I am rembering right, are not our spirits made of intelligence?

    If that be the case how does that relate to eternal progression? We know God posses all truth so progression doesn't lead to new knowledge, I was under the understanding that it is the growth of the eternal families we are in that increases the glory of God.

    If that is correct, wouldn't there be a finite number of spirit children, and seemingly trouble for "eternal" progression, or does this lead us back to the names of God in D&C 19?

    Or perhaps I am,

    A) Thinking too much,

    B) Have flawed premises,

    C) Both

    D) Just have to wait...

    Thanks for your thoughts!

  11. And Anatess, I want to believe that. The wall I am running into seems to be the fact that, because I want the lds church to be true, and because I try to stick in the faith promoting areas of stuff a good portion of the time, I feel like I am running from God, and because I don't want to go to church wi my parents because of this worry I am running, and NOT willing to follow the spirit.

  12. I am sitting in my parents church right now and I feel the feelin I have been unable to shake in the last 3 years of my membership. That I am uncomfortable here and I have the feeling that they will say something and I will know the church isn't true

    I know this is a lack of testimony I think. And I know I am only very recently getting back into doing the things I should be doing so I figure I will need to wait, but I worry because even when I was baptized I remember these feelings, I would love for them to just stop and my belief be strong enough to exist outside the church walls and my home and work and be able to sit in the midst of many who don't believe and not have worry in me.

    At thoughts?

  13. Anddenex, I have always found the word choice "remission" interesting in relation to sin. It paints sin as a cancer, that we can drive into remission by the grace of God received by obedience to the gospel. I certainly don't want to wander out so far I am back in sin, but yeah I do need to stay on the log as it were...