Snow Posted June 17, 2008 Report Posted June 17, 2008 Yes, all hail Snow, he has the won the conversation hands down. Thanks. Did I not use the word innocence in my last post to appease your perfect english record? Did I not explain the way I used the word. Is not communication about getting the desired message across? I think you look too far into things and want to make an argument out of every conversation from my oberservations. Anyway, thanks for the english/latin/every other language lesson. I use virtue and virginity intertangling.. since they seem to have the same prefix....but who knows maybe we should all just listen to you, you have the answer to everything.Oh Laura,That sarcastic victim act just won't get you too far. If one is going to take an extreme (and I say outrageous) position - like what you did in saying that you would prefer your children, hypothetically, dead, to being morally wayward, and then one publicly argues their position, then one ought to be very clear and precise in explaining one's position... and not complain too much when people take issue with the extreme position.Seriously, you needn't have shared your opinion, but you wanted us to know about it and wanted us to see the supposed merit in it. Then you became upset when you were disagreed with. I say some outrageous things too - I just don't get bent with people if they think my outrageous views are outrageous.
Guest lauracooke78 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Posted June 17, 2008 Oh Laura,That sarcastic victim act just won't get you too far. If one is going to take an extreme (and I say outrageous) position - like what you did in saying that you would prefer your children, hypothetically, dead, to being morally wayward, and then one publicly argues their position, then one ought to be very clear and precise in explaining one's position... and not complain too much when people take issue with the extreme position.Seriously, you needn't have shared your opinion, but you wanted us to know about it and wanted us to see the supposed merit in it. Then you became upset when you were disagreed with. I say some outrageous things too - I just don't get bent with people if they think my outrageous views are outrageous.Who said I was upset, or a vicitm....LOL... yes sarcasim, but definately not the other two. You must have assumed that from your angle on life, just like you assumed some other positions that I didn't have. And yes you did assume, else youwould have probed more into what you thought I believed and asked more questions instead of making judgements and condeming the way I parent.
Snow Posted June 17, 2008 Report Posted June 17, 2008 Who said I was upset, or a vicitm....LOL... .You could try reading, oh, say, post 100 or 112, etc
Guest lauracooke78 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Posted June 17, 2008 You could try reading, oh, say, post 100 or 112, etcNo sorry,you are assuming the tone of my post to be different to what it is. I wrote them to shut you up, as you seem to want to keep going. I'm done
Recommended Posts