KosherXMorg Posted June 13, 2008 Report Posted June 13, 2008 A pamphlet from the Church of Christ [w/ the Elijah Message]. It makes a lot of sense...THE ANGELNEPHIORMORONI?Prove all things by the words of truth in The Bible,Record of Nephites and The Word of the Lord. All this isestablished for mankind, the guidelines of hope anddeliverance. Man’s idealisms shall come to naught.Message 102:18Because we, The Church of Christ “The Church With theElijah Message,” believe in The Record of the Nephites (betterknown as The Book of Mormon), we are put into the category ofwhat some call “The Restoration Movement.” What we like to becalled is “Christians” and nothing else. Why? Because we feelthat much of the Restoration Movement base their beliefs onman-written historical events that are not consistent with theinspired written word. In other words, their beliefs are based onhistory, not the written word of God. Please remember that in theBible, Malachi 3:6, God says He changes not. It is so importantthat we believe in an unchangeable God.One of the beliefs in the Restoration is that the angel Moroniappeared unto Joseph Smith. We believe that it was the angelNephi. Please let us explain our position on this subject.In two different places in the Bible, there is a story about whenseveral people came to Jesus, trying to trick him. They gave Hima scenario about a woman that married a man, and he died, thenshe married his brother and he died, so she married the otherbrother and he died. The question asked was, “Whose wife is shein the resurrection?” Mark 12:24,25 And Jesus answering saidunto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not thescriptures, neither the power of God? For when they shallrise from the dead (the resurrected), they neither marry, norare given in marriage; but are as the angels which are inheaven. In the book of Luke 20:35-36, concerning the samestory, Jesus states it this way: But they which shall beaccounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrectionfrom the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto theangels; and are the children of God, being the children of theresurrection.This tells us there are at least two different kinds of angels:Angels made at the beginning, and then those that were human atone time and were resurrected. Now let’s understand that thegeneric term for an angel really means “Heavenly Creature.”Now let’s go to The Record of the Nephites and turn to the 40thchapter of Alma, where an angel told Alma what happens to thesouls from death until their resurrection.Alma 40:11. Now concerning the state of the soul betweendeath and the resurrection. Behold, it hath been made knownunto me by an angel, that the spirits of all men, as soon as theyare departed from this mortal body; yea, the spirits of allmen, whether they be good or evil, are taken home to thatGod who gave them life.12. And then shall it come to pass that the spirits of thosewhich are righteous, are received into a state of happiness,which is called paradise; a state of rest; a state of peace,where they shall rest from all their troubles, and from allcare, and sorrow, &c.13. And then shall it come to pass, that the spirits of thewicked, yea, which are evil; for behold, they have no part norportion of the spirit of the Lord; for behold, they chose evilworks, rather than good; therefore the spirit of the Devil didenter into them, and take possession of their house; and theseshall be cast out into outer darkness; there shall be weeping,and wailing, and gnashing of teeth; and this because of theirown iniquity; being led captive by the will of the Devil.14. Now this is the state of the souls of the wicked; yea, indarkness, and a state of awful, fearful looking for of the fieryindignation of the wrath of God upon them; thus they remainin this state, as well as the righteous in paradise, until the timeof their resurrection.Now we see that all souls stay either in Paradise or in [Hell]until their resurrection. Correct?Now let’s take another step. When was there a resurrection?We can find this in Matthew 27:52,53: And the graves wereopened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, Andcame out of the graves after his resurrection (Jesus), and wentinto the holy city, and appeared unto many.We have to understand that the saints were the only ones tohave risen, and those that slept (the dead, you don’t sleep ingraves) went into the Holy City. This is a resurrection. That’s theonly way they could have gone from one place to another.The next step is to find out when the next resurrection will be.This we can also find in the Bible. In the Second book ofThessalonians 4:16, For the Lord himself shall descend fromheaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with thetrump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first. WhenChrist comes back to Earth is when the next resurrection is goingto be.The point that we are making is the saints that died beforeChrist were resurrected and became as angels. The saints that diedafter Christ are still in Paradise waiting for their resurrection,which won’t be until Christ comes back to Earth. Nephi lived anddied before Christ. Moroni died after Christ. So Moroni is still inparadise awaiting his resurrection. Even in Moroni’s laststatement, the very last verse of The Record of the Nephites (orBook of Mormon), it states: (Moroni 10:34) And now I bid untoall, farewell. I soon go to rest in the Paradise of God, until myspirit and body shall again reunite, and I am brought forthtriumphant through the air, to meet you before the pleasingbar of the great Jehovah, the Eternal Judge of both quick anddead. Amen.Now let’s go to the books on Church History, Volume one,page 12. It states that the angel that appeared to Joseph Smith wasnamed “NEPHI.” At the bottom of the page it states “laterchanged to Moroni.” In other publications, it may state that theangel’s name was Moroni, but again at the bottom of the page, itwill state that originally it was Nephi. Also in The Times andSeasons, which Joseph Smith was supposed to have edited itbefore going to print, it also states that the angels name wasNephi. There is so much confusion in the Restoration’s history,and we know who is the author of confusionSo here is where the problem lies: Are we to base our beliefson the written history of man, or base our beliefs on the writtenword of God? We of The Church of Christ, will base our beliefson the written word of God Almighty.Printed by the Board of Publications ofTHE CHURCH OF CHRIST“THE CHURCH WITH THE ELIJAH MESSAGE”P.O. Box 1134INDEPENDENCE MO 64051 U.S.A.PHONE & FAX: 816-833-0640Web Site: The Church of Christ - "The Church with the Elijah Message"E-Mail: [email protected]
KosherXMorg Posted June 13, 2008 Author Report Posted June 13, 2008 How does this belong in the "Christian Beliefs" area. This is a topic about the Book of Mormon. I think I'm going to go insane.
skalenfehl Posted June 13, 2008 Report Posted June 13, 2008 ...What we like to becalled is “Christians” and nothing else. ...Are we to base our beliefson the written history of man, or base our beliefs on the writtenword of God? We of The Church of Christ, will base our beliefson the written word of God Almighty.Printed by the Board of Publications ofTHE CHURCH OF CHRIST“THE CHURCH WITH THE ELIJAH MESSAGE”While the LDS church is a Christian church, so is The Church of Christ, which isn't the LDS church, hence it was moved.
skalenfehl Posted June 13, 2008 Report Posted June 13, 2008 Because we, The Church of Christ “The Church With theElijah Message,” believe in The Record of the Nephites (betterknown as The Book of Mormon), we are put into the category ofwhat some call “The Restoration Movement.” What we like to becalled is “Christians” and nothing else.Kosher, your own post distinguishes its church from the LDS church. Am I missing something?
KosherXMorg Posted June 13, 2008 Author Report Posted June 13, 2008 You could put it under the Book of Mormon category. This topic isn't about "Christian Beliefs" as this category is intended. It's about the giving of the Book of Mormon by people who believe in the Book of Mormon. Whatever leave it here, nobody is going to touch it with a 10 foot pole anyways.
Guest Xzain Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 Sooo... is the point of this to offer some kind of proof against the LDS church, or just to offer interesting ideas from another church? It is interesting, but I don't see the point.
Tough Grits Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 I just don't get it.Why do people come to this site to post stuff to discredit or add smoke and mirrors to what we consider to be truth?Why can't those who find us "misinformed", "misguided", and "brainwashed" just talk about us behind our backs on other non-LDS forums?Why is this kind of thing allowed to be posted?Why not make a new discussion area only for those who wish to offer up arguments against our Church, faith, beliefs, doctrines, and principles. That way, the rest of us who are tired of being exposed to such nonsense don't have to be bombarded by this kind of stuff on a "supposedly" LDS site. We could call that discussion area: The Pretending Not To Be Anti-LDS (but really are) BoardJust my opinion. Nothing against anybody or their beliefs...but come on, I am not on the forums of other faiths trying to find chinks in their armor.
Guest Xzain Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 I don't know if Kosher was trying to present attacks on the LDS church- the article does (from my perspective) make implicit attacks on the LDS church, but that may be bias on my part. Kosher, do you have any points you would like to specifically discuss?
pam Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 Seriously. I just read the entire post and I too would like to know...What is the point of the post? What did you want to discuss?
KosherXMorg Posted June 14, 2008 Author Report Posted June 14, 2008 Why is everybody so defenesive??? I was offering it as an alternative viewpoint I thought it made a lot of sense. BTW, most BofM believing churches believe just as you, that it was Moroni, so it wasn't an attack on the LDS church. Do you like looking for ways to feel persecuted? To the guy that said I "whine a lot"... I'm not the guy that has filled up at least one page full of complaints to the moderators. I haven't complained once and won't because I'm a big boy not a sissy that has to run to mommy about everything, like, apparently, a lot of people are here.
Tough Grits Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 Why is everybody so defensive??? Because you are breaking the rules of the site.1. Do not post, upload, or otherwise submit anything to the site that is contrary to the teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Do not post anything that is derogatory towards The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, its teachers, or its leaders. Anti-LDS Propaganda will not be tolerated anywhere.I was offering it as an alternative viewpoint I thought it made a lot of sense. What you consider to be an alternative, some consider to be breaking the rules of the site and as making fun of us and our beliefs.BTW, most BofM believing churches believe just as you, that it was Moroni, so it wasn't an attack on the LDS church. This isn't OtherBoMBelievingChurches.net This is LDS.net. You are breaking the rules of the site.Do you like looking for ways to feel persecuted? Um, no. But why do some like to antagonize others, then cry foul when people actually react? Hmm. I don't really think this one needs an answer.To the guy that said I "whine a lot"... I'm not the guy that has filled up at least one page full of complaints to the moderators. I haven't complained once and won't because I'm a big boy not a sissy that has to run to mommy about everything, like, apparently, a lot of people are here. I have not sent one complaint to a moderator. But this is exactly the kind of insulting tirade that I find offensive. I just don't understand why you are allowed to call others names and belittle them, and then in the same breath you call THEM the sissy's.3. Personal attacks, name calling, flaming, and judgments against other members will not be tolerated. There is another rule broken. Gee, if I went to a forum and made fun of people, found nothing but negative things to say, and tried to "offer alternative teachings" to that site's chosen religion, than I would sort have to accept whatever consequences came as a result of my improper behavior. I don't think you even realize that you are the one causing your own misery, and that you are now the one who appears to be whining.I am sorry if this hurts your feelings. I would not have said anything, if you had not asked. But since you asked, I felt it appropriate to respond and answer your questions as best I could.I truly don't mind other points of view, I just don't like the rules being broken, and I really don't like reading belittling posts against other users on this forum. It is not conducive to the Spirit. I would defend you, if the shoe were on the other foot, but in this case it is you who is the author of your own misery.I send this with the best of intentions. I hope that maybe a change of heart can come about, and maybe you could learn to share you views without throwing so many jagged stones.Sincerely,Tough Grits
KosherXMorg Posted June 14, 2008 Author Report Posted June 14, 2008 Firstly the topic wasn't meant to belittle the LDS church or it's members. It was simply to share a viewpoint of the subject. YOU have CHOSEN to be offended or feel belittled. I was called a "whiner" so I called the REAL complainers "sissies", I think we can call it even. Why are you offended by this topic?? Because their reasoning makes sense? The response I got from an LDS member at Facebook was, "Interesting perspective. I hadn't thought of it that way before." Maybe it's just lds.net members that have a persecution complex? You seen to be implying with your post that since this is an LDS site, no alternative interpretation or theories should be discussed. Sad really.
Tough Grits Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 (edited) Maybe you should take this up with Heather.Maybe you should discuss with her how "sad" you find the rules of the site to be.I am not the one breaking them.I am more offended of the way you treat others, than about the false doctrine that you feel inclined to share. Your false doctrine does not mean anything to me.But the way you treat others is very offensive, and it just plain breaks the rules of the site.Again, you really need to take this up with Heather. I didn't make the rules...I just read them, and accepted to abide by them when I became a member of this site. Edited June 14, 2008 by Tough Grits typo
KosherXMorg Posted June 14, 2008 Author Report Posted June 14, 2008 If a moderator had a problem with this topic I would be concerned, but so far it's just you, sport. I'm done in this topic anyhow, having ToughGrits bag on me is not the point of the topic. Hasta!
john doe Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 Well, since you're done, I'll just close it then.
Recommended Posts