Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not sure what's wrong here. They couldn't reach a consensus on whether to let him speak at that particular time and some people came and became disruptive because they decided to go on with the agenda and let him speak after they'd gone through the agenda.

I don't like paranoid conspiracies, but it seems to me that openly disrupting their ability to form a coherent consensus and go through their agenda would be most useful to anyone who doesn't want them to form a group that can actually accomplish anything. That's suspiciously fortuitous and if I were the type of person to want to prevent a group like this gaining steam, I would put plants in deliberately to prevent actual conversation from taking place.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Thread closed. We've had some bad luck in other threads, so we're going to take a little break from the Occupy movement until we can all calm down. Or the election's over. Or heck freezes over. Or something . . .

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.