the Ogre Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 THE DISHES! :-)I've heard vacuuming and laundry works, too (without being told to to do them of course). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yediyd Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 The most romantic thing my husband ever did for me was when he came home from work one night...took one look at my tired face and then ordered me into the tub, he said he would look after the babies for a while!!! I took a long, hot bath...with NO INTERUPTIONS!!! That was awesome!!! I never forgot it!!!! (my babies were 8 weeks and 14 months, I was breastfeeding BOTH of them, at that time.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pushka Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 Not everyone's cup of tea, I know, but still yummy to me Steven Tyler of Aerosmith! ugh!! No offense pushka. Definitely not my cup of tea.I agree with that article to a point. Men with more feminine features, or softer looks generally have the personalities to match. My husband has the best of both. He has fair hair, fair skin and blue eyes. He has a really kind looking face, an honest face. He doesnt have a johny bravo jaw line, but yet his face is very masculine. Hes definitely not effeminate, but not arnie swarzeneggar, a perfect in between. Thanks to his job, he has great muscle tone, but not too much which i think looks horrible on men. And while hes a sweet, sensitive person, hes mentally strong and very stubborn when he wants to be. So I do agree that less macho looking (is probably a better way to put it) men are more attractive to women. Well, they are to me anyway!Lol Aphrodite!! You'd probably be surprised by the diverse kinds of people that I find attractive...possibly I'm attracted more to their charisma than their good/not good looks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiannan Posted August 13, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 Elphaba, there is no way I am going to trust a bureaucrat to ínterpret and apply a law to start sex ed for preschoolers. I really don't want Heather Has Two Mommies on the schedule for reading time for the kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Elphaba, there is no way I am going to trust a bureaucrat to ínterpret and apply a law to start sex ed for preschoolers. I really don't want Heather Has Two Mommies on the schedule for reading time for the kids.Here's what you get when bureaucrat 'educators' make such decisions:http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55800 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunnzy Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 that is absolutely disgusting.. I cant believe they had to sign a confedentiality agreement not to tell their parents! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiannan Posted August 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Doesn't surprise me -- there are always those who will take advantage of situations and that is why I would not support Obama's suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.