Lies – Nehor – doctrines of devils

[Traveler]

I put this thread in the general discussion category because it is the opposite of LDS doctrine, it is the plage of the ancient church from Adam to Christ (not really current events) yet it still applies to our day.

I was listening to CNN the other day and there was a trans (pretending) female talking about women sports and the beauty of transgenderism.  It reminded me of Nehor (and other anti-Christ doctrines) and their claim for what is good.  What caught me were the claim that transgender if beautiful.  The lie is prevalent in the LGBTQ+ movement.  It is a lie that is both anti-Christ and anti-science.

Some would argue that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but such thinking leaves out some critically important elements.  I would emphasize this with a most extreme example:  A beholder may behold cruelty of murder as beautiful.  That which is beautiful is something more related to things that are endearing, kind, uplifting and consistent across the broad spectrum of things beneficial.   Extinctions, violence, hatreds and the destructions of living or unliving things – especially for personal pleasure is never beautiful.

The doctrine of Nehor is a lie that whatever makes a person “happy” is beautiful to them.  It is the lie that whatever is happy in a moment is a lasting happiness.  Happiness is not that transient.  There is a saying that the difference between wisdom and foolishness is time and experience.  It is that wisdom is the act of learning and foolishness is the act of repeated ignorance.   This is the general problem.

Scientifically, trans, on an individual basis, is the elimination of that individual’s contribution to the gene pool.  On a social or species level it is the inevitable extinction of that social order or species.  It is like a cancer that will only survive while destroying its host.

I do realize that freedom and liberty must include the possibility of both good and bad (poor) choices.  But science tells us that the human brain has not reached it full executive functional levels until a human is 25 or more years old (in some cases – never).  This means that the mental handicap and adolescents are incapable of higher executive functional logic and must be taught or mentored in how to deal with the temptations of momentary pleasures.

Science is in on human cognitive behaviors as a process of learning or acquiring and not innate.   I have never heard an intelligent argument or seen any scientific data to indicate otherwise - that any LGBTQ+ behavior as non-cognitive.  To pretend or believe otherwise is a lie – despite how much anyone desires it to be otherwise.

If someone is an adult that as an adult has chosen any cognitive behavior – it is their privilege.  But to claim that their behavior is innate or that it is good to introduce such possibilities to children that have not developed higher executive functional logic is lying – perhaps to themselves as well as to everyone else. 

 

The Traveler

[mikbone]

It’s confusing alright.