Too late for Obama to turn it around?


bytor2112
 Share

Recommended Posts

GrandmaAri, two points:

1. How do you account for contemporaneously-published birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers?

2. As a legal matter, the Constitution does not require "proof of citizenship". It requires "citizenship" but is silent as to how this is to be demonstrated. It is the province of the US Supreme Court to make that call; and so far they do not appear to have done so.

And now, a question:

If the President does come up with a certificate of live birth in order to demonstrate his qualification for office (making himself, as far as I know, the first US president to do so)--what then? Will you accept it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

GrandmaAri, two points:

1. How do you account for contemporaneously-published birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers?

2. As a legal matter, the Constitution does not require "proof of citizenship". It requires "citizenship" but is silent as to how this is to be demonstrated. It is the province of the US Supreme Court to make that call; and so far they do not appear to have done so.

And now, a question:

If the President does come up with a certificate of live birth in order to demonstrate his qualification for office (making himself, as far as I know, the first US president to do so)--what then? Will you accept it?

How does one account for the fact that Obama is unaccountable to the American people? In order to assume the position of U.S. president, one must, by law, be a U.S. citizen. The issue has been made public on numerous occasions, but Obama apparently considers himself to be above the law and refuses to reveal the truth about his citizenship. In regard to proof of citizenship, once that is satisfied, we (Americans) still have a problem...Obama is a socialist. America is a Republic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does one account for the fact that Obama is unaccountable to the American people?

Umm . . . it's not like aliens flew in and elected the guy . . .

In order to assume the position of U.S. president, one must, by law, be a U.S. citizen. The issue has been made public on numerous occasions, but Obama apparently considers himself to be above the law and refuses to reveal the truth about his citizenship.

Or he considers himself a US citizen, believes that the evidence already provided should satisfy everyone with a reasonably open mind on the matter, and has not been asked to provide an actual certificate by anyone with lawful authority to do so.

In regard to proof of citizenship, once that is satisfied, we (Americans) still have a problem...Obama is a socialist. America is a Republic.

AMEN!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm . . . it's not like aliens flew in and elected the guy . . .

Or he considers himself a US citizen, believes that the evidence already provided should satisfy everyone with a reasonably open mind on the matter, and has not been asked to provide an actual certificate by anyone with lawful authority to do so.

That's a very interesting point you bring up... if he is foreign born, he is an alien. ;) Considering oneself to be a citizen is not the same as providing proof of citizenship. As an attorney, he know this, of course, and he's just being evasive. The question remains as to why Obama is being evasive about providing proof of U.S. citizenship by revealing his birth certificate to the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granny? You wanna beat Obama up over his ideology and policies, I'm there. Let's get the bats out and let him have it. But the citizenship debate on him is a rabbit hole. You won't be satisfied with whatever answer you get unless he comes right out and says he wasn't born here. Let it go and go after something you can affect, like the healthcare scam or his spending our country into oblivion, or his 'czars' being communists, or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granny? You wanna beat Obama up over his ideology and policies, I'm there. Let's get the bats out and let him have it. But the citizenship debate on him is a rabbit hole. You won't be satisfied with whatever answer you get unless he comes right out and says he wasn't born here. Let it go and go after something you can affect, like the healthcare scam or his spending our country into oblivion, or his 'czars' being communists, or worse.

First of all, I ain't your granny. lol You may call me Ari. :) Secondly, let's get down to the basics here. First things first...if Obama isn't a citizen, everything that he does as acting president is null and void!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, GrandmaAri, here's the deal:

The President does not have custody or control of the long-form birth certificate. That's in the State of Hawaii Archives. So this talk about "him releasing his birth certificate" is madness. He doesn't have the document.

Even if he could get the State to retrieve the long-form certificate (could you get your birth state to retrieve yours?), there is no way in high hades that they're going to part with the original.

And you and I both know that you won't be satisfied with a photocopy of the long-form birth certificate. If you'll accuse the state of Hawaii of forging a short-form, you'll no doubt also accuse them of doing the same with the long form if and when it comes to light.

So why should the President act as if there's a question concerning his citizenship when the State of Hawaii vouches for him and contemporaneously published newspapers mention his birth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, GrandmaAri, here's the deal:

The President does not have custody or control of the long-form birth certificate. That's in the State of Hawaii Archives. So this talk about "him releasing his birth certificate" is madness. He doesn't have the document.

Even if he could get the State to retrieve the long-form certificate (could you get your birth state to retrieve yours?), there is no way in high hades that they're going to part with the original.

And you and I both know that you won't be satisfied with a photocopy of the long-form birth certificate. If you'll accuse the state of Hawaii of forging a short-form, you'll no doubt also accuse them of doing the same with the long form if and when it comes to light.

Ok, so don't call me Ari. lol I was just trying to be friendly...on a first name basis. ;) This is interesting...I have my birth certificate...with the seal and all...as well as my certificate of live birth. Recently, I changed the name on my SS card, and the only form of ID they would accept was my original birth certificate. Are you submitting that as a lawyer...even the so-called president...that Obama is unable to obtain a copy of his own birth certificate? Or is he just unwilling to comply with the public demand to prove U.S. citizenship?

Edited by GrandmaAri
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so don't call me Ari. lol I was just trying to be friendly...on a first name basis. ;)

Apologies; I'll call you Ari, then. :)

This is interesting...I have my birth certificate...with the seal and all...as well as my certificate of live birth.

Were you born in Hawaii?

Recently, I changed the name on my SS card, and the only form of ID they would accept was my original birth certificate.

That's interesting. Not too long ago I got a SS card for my infant daughter (born in UT), and all the SSA demanded was the certification of live birth and not the long-form birth certificate. My recollection is that when my wife and I were married, again--all they needed was the certification of live birth.

Are you submitting that as a lawyer...even the so-called president...that Obama is unable to obtain a copy of his own birth certificate? Or is he just unwilling to comply with the public demand to prove U.S. citizenship?

I have no idea what regulations govern the Hawaii State Archives. But the funny thing is, if Obama did use the big stick of federal power and forced Hawaii to turn the original certificate over in spite of its own regulations--what howls of "state's rights" would then emanate from the exact same group that is currently demanding the certificate!

At any rate: the President met the standard required by our country's highest tribunal. All that remains is to placate a crowd that wouldn't vote for him anyways, and most of whom--to be blunt--if given the original birth certificate, would shred it as soon as read it.

Edited by Just_A_Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies; I'll call you Ari, then. :)

Were you born in Hawaii?

That's interesting. Not too long ago I got a SS card for my infant daughter (born in UT), and all the SSA demanded was the certification of live birth and not the long-form birth certificate. My recollection is that when my wife and I were married, again--all they needed was the certification of live birth.

I have no idea what regulations govern the Hawaii State Archives. But the funny thing is, if Obama did use the big stick of federal power and forced Hawaii to turn the original certificate over in spite of its own regulations--what howls of "state's rights" would then emanate from the exact same group that is currently demanding the certificate!

At any rate: the President met the standard required by our country's highest tribunal. All that remains is to placate a crowd that wouldn't vote for him anyways, and most of whom--to be blunt--if given the original birth certificate, would shred it as soon as read it.

Cool! Now what do I call you... guy? lol

And that's very interesting regarding your experiences. I live in Arizona, and I was required to provide my birth certificate. By the way, I was born on Halloween...if ya wanna check up on me, ya can. ;)

Sorry, but I just don't trust the government...you know, don't put your trust in the arm of flesh, and all that. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, I ain't your granny. lol You may call me Ari. :) Secondly, let's get down to the basics here. First things first...if Obama isn't a citizen, everything that he does as acting president is null and void!

I refuse to call you Ari. We had an Ari here a while ago who was certifiably crazy. Unless you're the same person? As for Obama, that horse has left the shed, there will be no do-over even if he's found not to be a citizen. The damage has been done and you can't just go back a year or four later and reset it. All you can do is work it out from this point on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I refuse to call you Ari. We had an Ari here a while ago who was certifiably crazy. Unless you're the same person? As for Obama, that horse has left the shed, there will be no do-over even if he's found not to be a citizen. The damage has been done and you can't just go back a year or four later and reset it. All you can do is work it out from this point on.

One and the same, tyvm! And no, I wasn't crazy then...nor am I now. And realistically speaking, if Obama is proven to not be a U.S. citizen, it will create a constitutional crisis.

Incidentally... judge not.... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One and the same, tyvm! And no, I wasn't crazy then...nor am I now. And realistically speaking, if Obama is proven to not be a U.S. citizen, it will create a constitutional crisis.

Incidentally... judge not.... ;)

And just how do you propose to prove it?

BTW, the corrected phrase is 'judge not unrighteously', and the record speaks for itself. Which brings us to another point. You are judging Obama based on......... what? Have you found a Nigerian, or Malaysian, or any other foreign birth certificate which proves he was born elsewhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just how do you propose to prove it?

BTW, the corrected phrase is 'judge not unrighteously', and the record speaks for itself. Which brings us to another point. You are judging Obama based on......... what? Have you found a Nigerian, or Malaysian, or any other foreign birth certificate which proves he was born elsewhere?

How do you propose to prove that I'm certifiably crazy?

Yes, we all make righteous/unrighteous judgements. I'm a constitutionalist; Obama is a Marxist. And I'm not crazy. 'Nuf said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think if it were proven that Obama's not a natural-born citizen of the U.S. it will matter. Those in power don't seek to honor the Constituion anyway, and any kind of grass-roots effort to impeach him won't get anywhere because of organized media opposition.

Obama's in it for the long haul- and where he's taking us is not a happy place. He's in, though- the American people chose flattering words over substantive principles, and now we're paying the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share