Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking through a few books on my shelf I haven't read yet and I have a book called Jesuse The Christ that someone gave me a while back.

I'm sure many of you have read it, anyone care to give me a brief review before I give it a read?

Posted (edited)

It is essentially a biography/doctrinal exposition using all the LDS Standard works (plus some additional resources such as talks by authorities IIRC) and it extends into both the pre and post mortal portions as much as we understand them. The bulk however is his mortal ministry.

Edited by Dravin
Posted

Elder James Talmage of the 12 apostles was commissioned by the First Presidency to cloister himself in a room in the SLC temple for months and write a serious and indepth book of Christ's life. He used as his primary text F.W. Farrar's "Life of Christ." You can read it online here: F.W. Farrar : The Life of Christ (1874) Free Online Books @ PreteristArchive.com, The Internet's Only Balanced Look at Preterism and Preterist Eschatology

Talmage was a scientist and a scholar. He uses many big words, so make sure you have a dictionary beside you as you read the book.

Guest mormonmusic
Posted

I'm looking through a few books on my shelf I haven't read yet and I have a book called Jesuse The Christ that someone gave me a while back.

I'm sure many of you have read it, anyone care to give me a brief review before I give it a read?

I read the book twice before my mission, and it's a great book to read cover to cover. James E Talmage was very intelligent, and I heard he wrote the book in the Temple. I can't verify that however, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was divine inspiration in his writing.

He does offer insights into the motives of the Savior, explains the parables in much greater depth than I've seen anywhere, and cleared up a number of things I wondered about, such as the parable of the unrighteous steward.

Posted · Hidden
Hidden

The first time you read this book it's sometimes easier to skip the footnotes, as they are often as long as the chapter itself. Then, go back and read it a second time including the footnotes.

Posted

My personal opinion is to skip the footnotes the first time you read it. It seems the footnotes are as long as the chapters themselves. When you read it through the second time, which is required IMO, then you can add the footnotes. The footnotes really take off on tangents and it's hard to re-center yourself on where you left on in the previous chapter.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...