MarginOfError Posted March 14, 2013 Report Posted March 14, 2013 Playfully accepted. As I hope it is realized my response was banter as well.No worries. It was well noted.
annewandering Posted March 14, 2013 Report Posted March 14, 2013 You are not Nephi. We arent dancing for rain. I know you will probably never get a clue but I post so that not everyone thinks that to be a good member of the church you have to be a conservative. Its not true and has never been true. You can ARGUE all you want but flailing in the dark isnt going to get you to any light. Oddly most of us prefer to research issues rather than rely on you to inform us of the correct stand. I expect you are quite capable of doing the same despite evidence to the contrary. I am not now and never will be a victim. What happens to a person is outside that person not inside and you will never be my victimizer. No one ever will be. I dont think you are being mean. Just being run of the mill conservative that watches too much Fox and has decided conservatism is your religion.
Windseeker Posted March 14, 2013 Author Report Posted March 14, 2013 Secular Humanism (modern day liberalism) is a relgion and should be classified as such.
selek Posted March 14, 2013 Report Posted March 14, 2013 You are not Nephi. I never claimed that I was. As a faithful Mormon, I don't believe in reincarnation. I know you will probably never get a clue... You know, for as much as you whinge about personal attacks, your last couple of posts have implied that I am arrogant, clueless, uneducated, and dishonest (not to mention a bully)......but still haven't addressed my actual arguments....I post so that not everyone thinks that to be a good member of the church you have to be a conservative. Its not true and has never been true. It's also not an argument I have ever made. Go figure.The closest I have come to this particular caricaturewas pointing out the double standard on abortion from a couple of pages back- but even abortion is not a clearly "conservative" or "liberal" issue.Oddly most of us prefer to research issues rather than rely on you to inform us of the correct stand. I expect you are quite capable of doing the same despite evidence to the contrary. More personal attacks? Tell you what: instead of the name-calling, why don't you address my actual arguments?Iinstead of the passive-aggressive shtick, why not address what I said in lieu of beating up on strawmen?I am not now and never will be a victim. What happens to a person is outside that person not inside and you will never be my victimizer. No one ever will be. I dont think you are being mean. Just being run of the mill conservative that watches too much Fox and has decided conservatism is your religion.Wow. So much condescension and prejudice- so little attempt to address the substance of my arguments.
MarginOfError Posted March 14, 2013 Report Posted March 14, 2013 Hmmm...still waiting for a response to this.http://www.lds.net/forums/general-discussion/52484-will-we-held-accountable-our-political-social-beliefs-actions-7.html#post738255
estradling75 Posted March 14, 2013 Report Posted March 14, 2013 And that is enough of this little marry go round. Thread Closed
Recommended Posts