Did Scientists Create Christian Fundamentalism?


Recommended Posts

In this interesting article the author suggests that scientists created Christian Fundamentalism (indirectly, mind you) as a means of promoting the profession of science. He says that prior to the 19th century science was a hobby, mostly practiced by the rich and by clergy. By pitting modern wisom against religion it was hoped that full-time professional positions would be created for "scientists." These would become the "priests" of modernity. Since the schism was created to bolster science as a profession, it is understandable, though lamentable, that science personalities, like Bill Nye, end up debating the likes of Ken Ham (Young Earth Creationists) rather than any number of more reputable scientists, who might promote the idea of a Creator.

The Nye-Ham debates, or why fundamentalism exists

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would have been much more interesting to see Bill Nye debate someone like Stephen C. Meyer or Thomas Nagel. Intelligent design which bridges science and religion and also reveals the gaping holes in currently scientific theories (Neo-Darwinism) would have made a more interesting debate.

The deck was stacked. It would have been like pitting Al Gore against an actual scientist or Bill Maher against a David Berlinski.

Thanks for sharing the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might find this study interesting.

Misconceptions of science and religion found in new study

“We found that nearly 50 percent of evangelicals believe that science and religion can work together and support one another,” Ecklund said. “That’s in contrast to the fact that only 38 percent of Americans feel that science and religion can work in collaboration.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FunkyTown...good point. In fact the most anti-Creationist anti-Intelligent Design folks are not the university academics--but the high school science teacher groups. I understand the reluctance of scientists to engage folk that insist science comport to particular biblical interpretations. On the other hand, when they use a broad brush to dismiss anything that remotely hints at some kind of higher power, they prove themselves to also be ideology-driven manipulators of science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...