Recommended Posts

Posted

No, you said

QUOTE

Just and interesting fact. I have never heard a mormon tell me of something their god did that I couldn't duplicate.

You placed no other qualifiers.

Now, put your money where your mouth is and start descendn'.

You prove to me that your god ever descended from a pillar of light, or whatever you said. If I claimed the exact same thing, you would want some evidence. I am asking the same thing.
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Originally posted by Tr2@Mar 12 2004, 02:07 PM

No, you said

QUOTE

Just and interesting fact. I have never heard a mormon tell me of something their god did that I couldn't duplicate.

You placed no other qualifiers.

Now, put your money where your mouth is and start descendn'.

You prove to me that your god ever descended from a pillar of light, or whatever you said. If I claimed the exact same thing, you would want some evidence. I am asking the same thing.
You didn't say that you required proof. You just said, "I have never heard a mormon tell me of something their god did..."

I'm a mormon, I told you something 'my' God did. Now, let's see you duplicate it.

With these additional requierments that you've added on. Please show me something that the Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship God has done that I can't duplicate.

Guest Starsky
Posted

I read something about this kind of discussion....You can't prove spiritual happenings through physical means.

It is a matter of belief. How do you prove spiritual things in world accepting ways....lol

Posted

I'm a mormon, I told you something 'my' God did. Now, let's see you duplicate it.

I did ask you what your God did. You claimed something, all I asked is if you witnesses this event yourself? For all I know this could be something you just decided to make up to try and gain the upper hand in a discussion. And if you want to talk about TACF, start another thread. Don't try and change the subject. You are giving me unvalidated claims which don't prove your god has done anything.
Posted

Originally posted by Snow@Mar 12 2004, 11:31 AM

Cal,

What is up with your inablitly to use quote tags correctly?

Get with the program for heaven's sake. You're an educator. Lead by example and we'll follow.

And where does it say in the rules that I have to conform to your "quoting" expectations?
Posted
Originally posted by Cal+Mar 13 2004, 09:28 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Cal @ Mar 13 2004, 09:28 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Snow@Mar 12 2004, 11:31 AM

Cal,

What is up with your inablitly to use quote tags correctly?

Get with the program for heaven's sake. You're an educator. Lead by example and we'll follow.

And where does it say in the rules that I have to conform to your "quoting" expectations?

I move that we place it in the rules. Does anyone second it?

:P:D:lol::rolleyes: :)

Guest curvette
Posted

Originally posted by Cal@Mar 12 2004, 08:11 AM

Thank you for calling me a PIG, Porter---quite Christian of you.

A pig? You got off easy Cal. He called me an "ignorant, base, fool!"
Posted

Originally posted by LaurelTree@Mar 12 2004, 11:20 AM

pig is a little out of line..you could say you dont agree.....

and I am on Mod status for LESS. Where is justice anyway?

This is an honest question. Please answer

Posted
Originally posted by curvette+Mar 13 2004, 10:06 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (curvette @ Mar 13 2004, 10:06 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Cal@Mar 12 2004, 08:11 AM

Thank  you for calling me a PIG, Porter---quite Christian of you.

A pig? You got off easy Cal. He called me an "ignorant, base, fool!"

Well he can't be wrong every time :lol: Totally just kidding--and you know that. Curvy, you're the best!

Posted

Originally posted by Cal+Mar 13 2004, 11:06 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Cal @ Mar 13 2004, 11:06 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by -curvette@Mar 13 2004, 10:06 AM

<!--QuoteBegin--Cal@Mar 12 2004, 08:11 AM

Thank  you for calling me a PIG, Porter---quite Christian of you.

A pig? You got off easy Cal. He called me an "ignorant, base, fool!"

Well he can't be wrong every time :lol: Totally just kidding--and you know that. Curvy, you're the best!

Look Cal,

You're a scientistiffic type. You of all people should be aware of the research that cleary show while while Curvette is one of the better ones, she is not THE BEST. At her current rate of progress, she will not become THE BEST until 2087 (January 3), assuming of course that nitrogen levels remain constant.

Guest Starsky
Posted
Originally posted by curvette+Mar 13 2004, 10:06 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (curvette @ Mar 13 2004, 10:06 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Cal@Mar 12 2004, 08:11 AM

Thank  you for calling me a PIG, Porter---quite Christian of you.

A pig? You got off easy Cal. He called me an "ignorant, base, fool!"

Your kidding...I missed that one...Porter....Porter...Porter...this is for you!

<span style=\'font-family:Geneva\'>Stop calling people names.

Posted

Originally posted by Cal@Mar 13 2004, 09:28 AM

And where does it say in the rules that I have to conform to your "quoting" expectations?

Look at me. Look right at my foreheand. Do you see what is stamped there?

It says KING for a reason Cal.

Posted

Stop threatening people into submission. He didn't called anyone a pig, he referenced a biblical scripture about pearls and swine and Cal deliberately inferred (and incorrectly) from it that he, Cal, was the swine in question in an sarcastic attempt to make the whippersnapping feel contrite so that Cal could have the moral high ground in the next go-round if Porter falls for it.

If you keep moving topics of the busy forum and keep stiffling discussion, pretty soon you'll be successful.

Guest curvette
Posted

Originally posted by Cal@Mar 13 2004, 11:06 AM

Well he can't be wrong every time :lol: Totally just kidding--and you know that. Curvy, you're the best!

Aw, thanks. I'll disregard what Porter said. I'm the best, I'm the best, I'm the best....
Posted
Originally posted by Snow@Mar 13 2004, 11:41 AM

Stop threatening people into submission. He didn't called anyone a pig, he referenced a biblical scripture about pearls and swine and Cal  deliberately inferred (and incorrectly) from it that he, Cal, was the swine in question in an sarcastic attempt to make the whippersnapping feel contrite so that Cal could have the moral high ground in the next go-round if Porter falls for it.

If you keep moving topics of the busy forum and keep stiffling discussion, pretty soon you'll be successful.

So, Snow, who, then was the "swine" that Porter was refering to? <_<

And, since when did people on this forum refrain from making comment not necessarily directly on point with the thread--we often diverge a little. What is the big deal?

I'm trying to be nice to you, and you come off with this lame comment. Porque?

Guest Starsky
Posted

Originally posted by Cal+Mar 13 2004, 11:45 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Cal @ Mar 13 2004, 11:45 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Snow@Mar 13 2004, 11:41 AM

Stop threatening people into submission. He didn't called anyone a pig, he referenced a biblical scripture about pearls and swine and Cal  deliberately inferred (and incorrectly) from it that he, Cal, was the swine in question in an sarcastic attempt to make the whippersnapping feel contrite so that Cal could have the moral high ground in the next go-round if Porter falls for it.

If you keep moving topics of the busy forum and keep stiffling discussion, pretty soon you'll be successful.

So, Snow, who, then was the "swine" that Porter was refering to? <_<

And, since when did people on this forum refrain from making comment not necessarily directly on point with the thread--we often diverge a little. What is the big deal?

I'm trying to be nice to you, and you come off with this lame comment. Porque?

He is talking to me....
Posted
Originally posted by Snow@Mar 13 2004, 11:41 AM

Stop threatening people into submission. He didn't called anyone a pig, he referenced a biblical scripture about pearls and swine and Cal deliberately inferred (and incorrectly) from it that he, Cal, was the swine in question in an sarcastic attempt to make the whippersnapping feel contrite so that Cal could have the moral high ground in the next go-round if Porter falls for it.

If you keep moving topics of the busy forum and keep stiffling discussion, pretty soon you'll be successful.

Peace--read Snow's posting more carefully.

Guest Starsky
Posted
Originally posted by Marsha+Mar 13 2004, 10:12 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Marsha @ Mar 13 2004, 10:12 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--LaurelTree@Mar 12 2004, 11:20 AM

pig is a little out of line..you could say you dont agree.....

and I am on Mod status for LESS. Where is justice anyway?

This is an honest question. Please answer

It was a constant bashing of the moderators Marsha that got you put on Mod status. You didn't do it twice or three times...you did it constantly.

This confersation should be done on PMs...I am only allowing it this once....

Posted

Cal,

Peace is right. I'm talking to her. I doubt that you were to offending by the swine reference. You did what I would have done - tried to make him feel guilty so as to gain the upper hand in the debate. I am not complaining about that or about your motives. I just think threatenng the kid with moderator discipline over the pearls and swine comment is unnecessary.

Guest Starsky
Posted

You can bring it back on topic...but your complaint about if being off topic...is off :o topic...so.... :unsure::blink::huh:

Posted

No wonder why everysingle topic is over 2 pages long. The moderators do a crappy job of keeping topics on-topic. Isn't this topic supposed to be about witnessing?

That is called "Discussion". Neat huh?
Posted

Originally posted by DisRuptive1@Mar 13 2004, 03:07 PM

No wonder why everysingle topic is over 2 pages long. The moderators do a crappy job of keeping topics on-topic. Isn't this topic supposed to be about witnessing?

I didn't realize that it is the moderator's job to keep the threads on-topic. If we even attempted to do that, everyone and their brother would be complaining about us instead of the usual 2 or 3. :o

Give us a break! <_<

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...