Traveler Posted June 6, 2013 Report Posted June 6, 2013 I have questions about Benghazi that I wish could be answered. 1. Why was Ambassador Stephens working in Benghazi? 2. Did any of our allies have official embassy staff or security in Benghazi at the time? If so were they notified? 3. What communications did we have with our allies in Libya during the attack - what was tenor of those discussions - did we officially ask for help? 4. What was Ambassador Stephens specifically trying to accomplish in Benghazi? 5. Specifically, who assigned Ambassador Stephens to go to Benghazi? 6. Was Ambassador Stephens encouraged to stay in Benghazi after additional Security was denied? And if so by Who? Just wondering???? The Traveler Quote
yjacket Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 I have questions about Benghazi that I wish could be answered.1. Why was Ambassador Stephens working in Benghazi?2. Did any of our allies have official embassy staff or security in Benghazi at the time? If so were they notified?3. What communications did we have with our allies in Libya during the attack - what was tenor of those discussions - did we officially ask for help?4. What was Ambassador Stephens specifically trying to accomplish in Benghazi?5. Specifically, who assigned Ambassador Stephens to go to Benghazi?6. Was Ambassador Stephens encouraged to stay in Benghazi after additional Security was denied? And if so by Who?Just wondering????The TravelerDo not ask questions you don't want to know the answers to.Simple answer: Money, power, politics.Not so simple answer: Drug running, gun running, CIA involvement, and propping up multiple "allies" who will later become our "enemies".The rabbit hole goes very, very deep. Embassy personal are very speCIAl people indeed."You can't handle the Truth!" Quote
carlimac Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Here's Glenn Beck's theory. He's not right on everything but his ideas on Bengazi are intriguing.Glenn: Here’s the truth on Benghazi – Glenn Beck Quote
Traveler Posted July 19, 2013 Author Report Posted July 19, 2013 Well we now know that what ever it was that we thought we knew - there something not being disclosed. Anyone directly connected with what was going on before and during the attack has been under strict observation of both the CIA and FBI and have been forced to find special non-disclosure agreement (not sure of how legal that is) and have been withheld from speaking to congress. Hmmmmm - Interesting - lucky for us this happened under the self proclaimed most open administration to govern this country. The Traveler Quote
Palerider Posted July 20, 2013 Report Posted July 20, 2013 It seems as a Country we are more troubled over everything but the happenings of Benghazi Quote
Traveler Posted July 22, 2013 Author Report Posted July 22, 2013 Interesting - We also now know that Secretary Clinton specifically asked our ambassador to have a presents in Benghazi (to be there in person) and not to leave though other allies had left (removed their ambassador and staff) because of dangers. What we do not know yet, is if Clinton realized that requests for increased security for Benghazi had been denied. However, we do know that she made no effort to reprimand her assistant under her for denying increased security after the fact.The Traveler Quote
bytor2112 Posted July 24, 2013 Report Posted July 24, 2013 I heard that George Zimmerman is considering changing his name to Ben Ghazi so the media won't talk about him anymore............ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.