GADBabaganoosh Posted July 11, 2010 Report Posted July 11, 2010 Technically the Ressurection to come is the second, because people were already when Christ was. So she may come forth in OUR first ressurection, when Christ returns. Quote
GADBabaganoosh Posted July 11, 2010 Report Posted July 11, 2010 Perhaps thats what was on the Patriarchs mind. I can't see why that would be a sure thing... I just don't know. Quote
Hemidakota Posted July 12, 2010 Report Posted July 12, 2010 The last ordinace says it all, the fullness of the priesthood, when a person marries in the temple. This can overide any former blessing if one endures to the end and follow the same path as the Savior. One of my daughters's PB did not reveal any resurrection. She was curious about this issue. As I told her, through your parents, you are saved if you endure to the end. Not only that, what did the temple sealer state to your husband and you, concerning the resurrection? She understand that what was missing in your PB is added by what was given in the temple and through a latter blessing of the parent. Quote
missfr3sh Posted December 11, 2010 Report Posted December 11, 2010 Is it common for a PB to talk about resurrection? Mine does not, but states that I will be saved in the Celestial kingdom. Quote
Traveler Posted December 12, 2010 Report Posted December 12, 2010 Is it common for a PB to talk about resurrection? Mine does not, but states that I will be saved in the Celestial kingdom. The meaning is the same. To be resurrected in the first resurrection is a saved member of the Celestial KingdomThe Traveler Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.