Your opinion: Obvious or not obvious?


Vort
 Share

Recommended Posts

ADAM (original Facebook posting): Well, Obama won, the Republicans retained the House, gay marriage gains approved, and guess what? The world didn't end.

BOB: Well, Hitler killed six million Jews, terrorists flew airplanes into the WTC, and a family was wiped out in an automobile accident. And guess what? The world didn't end. But the fact that the world didn't end does not mean those things were not bad or hurtful.

CATHY: Oh, very nice, Bob, comparing Obama to Hitler. Nothing extreme about that. :)

BOB: Cathy, I didn't compare Obama to Hitler. I said that Adam's observation that "the world didn't end" doesn't mean the things he mentioned were of no consequence. Not sure how to make this any clearer. Did you also think I was comparing Obama's re-election to a family being wiped out? Or was it just the Hitler thing?

CATHY: You compared Obama's reelection to Hitler's genocide (and the WTC bombings). I think my interpretation was perfectly reasonable.

BOB: No, I did not. Again, I don't know how to make this any clearer.

************************

What say ye? Was Cathy's interpretation perfectly reasonable? Was Bob's invocation of Godwin's Law reasonably interpreted as a comparison with Obama?

Bob's comparison was meant to be emotionally charged. Cathy's interpretation was a bit hysterical and unreasonable (so Bob got what he was after?). And even though you didn't ask, Adam's comment was inane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Socialism is not a dirty word. My husband is a proud socialist. One daughter, at least, is socialist and she is proud of it. I am not socialist but have liberal leanings. :D One son is a far right conservative. I am not sure what emotional laden term to call him.

Problem is that we throw the terms around without even knowing what they mean just for the emotional impact, usually negative.

Comparing a person, or their beliefs, to Hitler, in anyway is not going to make friends. Calling a person a socialist isnt either since they generally know you are attempting to insult them. To try to throw the blame on the recipient is just ingenuous to say the least. An insult was intended so he ought man up and admit it but no he is going to blame her for 'misunderstanding'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Socialism is not a dirty word. My husband is a proud socialist. One daughter, at least, is socialist and she is proud of it. I am not socialist but have liberal leanings. :D One son is a far right conservative. I am not sure what emotional laden term to call him.

Problem is that we throw the terms around without even knowing what they mean just for the emotional impact, usually negative.

Comparing a person, or their beliefs, to Hitler, in anyway is not going to make friends. Calling a person a socialist isnt either since they generally know you are attempting to insult them. To try to throw the blame on the recipient is just ingenuous to say the least. An insult was intended so he ought man up and admit it but no he is going to blame her for 'misunderstanding'.

How so very uncynical of you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just doing a quick search on lds.net:

If we really did our homework and approached the Book of Mormon doctrinally, we could expose the errors and find the truths to combat many of the current false theories and philosophies of men, including socialism...

-Ezra Taft Benson

Would you like to know of the warnings of the prophets about our increasing descent down the soul-destroying road of socialism and what they have told us to do about it?

-Ezra Taft Benson

As our modern societies follow the course which led to the fall of Rome and other civilizations which succumbed to the deceptive lure of the welfare state and socialism, I think it not inappropriate for me to emphasize again the Lord’s plan for the temporal salvation of His mortal children.

-Marion G Romney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to shake things up again, let's try this:

ADAM (original Facebook posting): Well, Romney won, the Republicans retained the House and took the Senate, gay marriage soundly defeated, and guess what? The world didn't end.

BOB: Well, Hitler killed six million Jews, terrorists flew airplanes into the WTC, and a family was wiped out in an automobile accident. And guess what? The world didn't end. But the fact that the world didn't end does not mean those things were not bad or hurtful.

Should Romney, or his supporters, be offended?

I'm also going to go out on a limb and say that our genetic, knee-jerk aversion to socialism has made us conservatives lazy. For three decades or so we didn't have to articulate what was wrong with socialism - the fact that their greatest champion had thousands of nukes pointed at us, kind of made it easy to pooh-pooh the ideology itself.

The Republican party needs to re-engage the debate intellectually. People are inevitably going to ask - as Annewandering has - "what's really so wrong about socialism"; and merely sound-byting Benson and reminding them (since Godwin's already out of the bag, at least on this thread) that it has killed more people than Hitler ever dreamed, isn't enough anymore.

Edited by Just_A_Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just doing a quick search on lds.net:

Yes and When did he say those? He mentions prophets as if he was not one yet. So do we have to believe all his opinions at that time?

Why do you suppose we dont take sides on candidates anymore? Sure there is the tax thing but more importantly, in my opinion, it has a lot to do with conservatives throwing Pres. Bensons OPINIONS out there as if they were from God. They arent. They are from Pres. Benson long before he was president of the church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pres. Benson was not a prophet then so no they never did count as Gospel and Elder Romney never was prophet. I dont know when he said what he said.

Actually, ALL of the prophets and apostles are sustained as "prophets, seers, and revelators", so technically you are wrong on both. That their words are not binding upon is may be true, but we are encouraged to prayerfully consider their words, not just reject them because they do not fit our social view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eowyn provided apostolic quotes against socialism. Can anyone provide apostolic quotes encouraging or praising socialism? I can't seem to find any that would support Annwandering's knowledge of being right.

Most Prophets tend to avoid politics with good cause. We dont need any more martyrs do we?

There is also the thing about many members of the church live under other governments including socialism. Should we be calling them out as being evil? I do seem to recall and Article of Faith addressing that issue. I also recall that Jesus was not overly interested in governments except for His Fathers kingdom.

Perhaps our attention should be directed in similar ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pres. Benson was not a prophet then so no they never did count as Gospel and Elder Romney never was prophet. I dont know when he said what he said.

After President Benson was called to be the prophet, there were two topics he spoke on more than any others. One was the Book of Mormon. One was the Constitution. Around the two hundredth anniversary of the Constitution, he spoke at BYU. (I was there.) The title of his talk was, "The Constitution:A Heavenly Banner." In this talk, he talks about basic constitutional principles.

Here is the text:

Speeches

Other talks on the Constitution can be found in conference issues of the Ensign during the time he was prophet.

Near the end of the talk I linked to, he talks about the prophecy made by Joseph Smith.

"We are fast approaching that moment prophesied by Joseph Smith when he said: Even this Nation will be on the very verge of crumbling to pieces and tumbling to the ground and when the constitution is upon the brink of ruin this people will be the Staff up[on] which the Nation shall lean and they shall bear the constitution away from the very verge of destruction."

He goes on to ask "Will we be prepared?" and lists the things we need to do to be prepared.

Among the things listed he says:

" 2. We must learn the principles of the

Constitution and then abide by its precepts. Have we read the Constitution and pondered it? Are we aware of its principles? Could we defend it? Can we recognize when a law is constitutionally unsound? The Church will not tell us how to do this, but we are admonished to do it. "

From a personal viewpoint it was some years before I got around to following that council.

And it's my feeling now that we will have a different perspective if we follow that council than if we do not.

Edited by bythelake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share