NeedleinA

"Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from the virus they got vaccinated against because you're not vaccinated."
- Unknown theorists

I would get the renewal as a courtesy to the bishop. If everyone waits until the local temple is open again then there will be a backlog once it’s open. And again in 2 years. 
 
And if it doesn’t open until December you might have to wait for him to finish with tithing settlement and priesthood advancements.

None of these count. It's all just anecdotal. There is nothing to see here, folks. Move along. There is no man behind the curtain. You're all a bunch of wacko conspiracy theorists. Just accept what the media report. You can trust them.

A retired co-worker caught Covid, was hospitalized, recovered and was released.  Three weeks later he was back in the hospital with pneumonia and died.  His death certificate listed Covid as the cause of death.
 
A friend's uncle had Stage 4 lung cancer, caught Covid, then died.  His death certificate listed Covid.
 
Another co-worker had a family member with some cancer related issue that was fatal (I no longer remember what on this one), caught Covid and died.  His death certificate listed Covd as the cause of death.
 
I am far from the only person with these stories.
 
The Covid death numbers are doctored.

Fauci, our nation's top paid federal employee and go to scientist in 2020 said:
So... was Fauci spreading 'garbage'?
If so, then we agree upon something.

So... just to clarify... the World Doctors Alliance is:
They say:
The news outlet @dprh cites agrees and in fact gives two instances where this exact car crash thing took place.
So super sleuths... where is the fraud on behalf of Worlds Doctor Alliance?
While it appears that the WDA's point is "People who die within 28 days of a positive pcr test are deemed to have died from covid" individuals want to try and discredit the doctors of the WDA because 'now' the death certificates are being reversed. 

World Doctors Alliance share the following about how disastrous death certificates & cause of death have been when it comes to Covid:
 

krSKqdoQfhhRAFHEoEwS_07_208504cf8676f8d0a66ddf90fda4ca63_video_1080p_converted.mp4

Fauci, our nation's top paid federal employee and go to scientist in 2020 said:
So... was Fauci spreading 'garbage'?
If so, then we agree upon something.

So... just to clarify... the World Doctors Alliance is:
They say:
The news outlet @dprh cites agrees and in fact gives two instances where this exact car crash thing took place.
So super sleuths... where is the fraud on behalf of Worlds Doctor Alliance?
While it appears that the WDA's point is "People who die within 28 days of a positive pcr test are deemed to have died from covid" individuals want to try and discredit the doctors of the WDA because 'now' the death certificates are being reversed. 

In equally hilarious related news, individuals who die from plastic surgery complications can be listed as having died from Covid*
In less comical news and not clumped into a separate 'plastic surgery' category... here are the VAERS deaths by vaccine manufacture.

* People who die within 28 days of a positive pcr test are deemed to have died from covid, even if they die in a car crash or from a heart attack; clearly over inflating the death toll (2)

The CDC wants their cake and eat too, but they can't have it both ways.
They want us to fully embrace their numbers when it comes to Covid deaths, but on the other hand completely ignore/discredit the numbers on VAERS Vaccine related deaths.
Both stats derive their data from imperfect sources, so why are we told only to believe one and ignore the other?
The VAERS database belongs to the CDC, but when/if the data doesn't support their narrative they want to distance themselves from it.
The VAERS disclaimer states:

The exact excuses (incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, unverifiable, biases) are the same reasons their Covid death numbers can't be relied upon either (See Death Certificate post above). Again the CDC says, "We have no biases, believe us, trust us, our numbers are accurate, but only if those numbers agree with what we want them to say".
Like my girl Padmé, I have a vote of "no confidence" in the CDC right now.

 
 

@NeedleinA  This is late, but my area (in the South) also had a significant number of members choosing to not renew recommends.  Executive secretaries and ward clerks sent reminders and tried to schedule appointments and a surprising (to me) number of people still chose not to renew their recommends.
As I browsed through this thread I didn't notice any mention of Elder Rasband's Oct 2020 general conference talk, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2020/10/16rasband?lang=eng.  He said:
He also reminded us of Howard W. Hunter teaching that we should hold and be worthy of a recommend even if we don't have access to a temple.  He shared:
 
Aside from reminding members and trying to schedule appointments, another approach we took was to remind them of the Lord's teachings using this talk by Elder Rasband.  But I'm not sure it had much affect.

So... just to clarify... the World Doctors Alliance is:
They say:
The news outlet @dprh cites agrees and in fact gives two instances where this exact car crash thing took place.
So super sleuths... where is the fraud on behalf of Worlds Doctor Alliance?
While it appears that the WDA's point is "People who die within 28 days of a positive pcr test are deemed to have died from covid" individuals want to try and discredit the doctors of the WDA because 'now' the death certificates are being reversed. 

You are missing the point.

Truth is not truth unless it's spoken by an approved source.

That was a classic response. I'd like to shake the hand of whoever wrote that. Whoever it was. Some random Ask Gramps guy.

All well and good @pam, but gramps reminds us
 

Some of you will think I'm an idiot for not knowing this sooner.  But...
I was just reading a book about a famous sailor / captain with my daughter and came across an interesting discovery.  The phrase is not "Anchors away!"  (which I never really understood).  It is "Anchors aweigh!"  Very different meaning.
Thought I'd share.

Very interesting. Thanks for the explanation. 

The CDC wants their cake and eat too, but they can't have it both ways.
They want us to fully embrace their numbers when it comes to Covid deaths, but on the other hand completely ignore/discredit the numbers on VAERS Vaccine related deaths.
Both stats derive their data from imperfect sources, so why are we told only to believe one and ignore the other?
The VAERS database belongs to the CDC, but when/if the data doesn't support their narrative they want to distance themselves from it.
The VAERS disclaimer states:

The exact excuses (incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, unverifiable, biases) are the same reasons their Covid death numbers can't be relied upon either (See Death Certificate post above). Again the CDC says, "We have no biases, believe us, trust us, our numbers are accurate, but only if those numbers agree with what we want them to say".
Like my girl Padmé, I have a vote of "no confidence" in the CDC right now.

 
 

What is the standard they are using to confirm these transmission are "ALMOST" from unvaccinated people? Are they providing the results of how they can confirm these are from unvaccinated individuals? Is there a difference between the transmission of Covid from a vaccinated person vs. the transmission of Covid from a unvaccinated individual? If not, then how can this be trusted?

World Doctors Alliance share the following about how disastrous death certificates & cause of death have been when it comes to Covid:
 

krSKqdoQfhhRAFHEoEwS_07_208504cf8676f8d0a66ddf90fda4ca63_video_1080p_converted.mp4

World Doctors Alliance share the following about how disastrous death certificates & cause of death have been when it comes to Covid:
 

krSKqdoQfhhRAFHEoEwS_07_208504cf8676f8d0a66ddf90fda4ca63_video_1080p_converted.mp4

Three Covid positive tests in my ward in the last 4 weeks.  All three were fully vaccinated.

At an opiate addiction seminar I went to a couple years ago, it was stated that there are no universal training or accreditation requirements for coroners or universal standards about how to determine “cause of death” (for example, a person may OD to the point that their heart stops; one coroner may name the cause of death as “opiate overdose” whereas another may simply write “cardiac arrest” on the death certificate).
The data should be taken with a huge grain of salt; but at the same time—we aren’t likely to get better data anytime soon; and the spotty data we have is likely more a result of incompetence rather than malevolence.