NeedleinA

I hate that this is true.

Is anyone still under the false impression that any of the COVID death rates given to us by the CDC are accurate?

Is anyone still under the false impression that any of the COVID death rates given to us by the CDC are accurate?

Ezra Taft Benson
And
 

Shucks, no 'gay agenda' after all. My bad. I thought they were after my conservative kids.
Honestly, the fact they are trying to make light of what they are doing, doesn't negate what they are doing.

Nothing to see here folks...

Not sure, but good question.
I just came across this song, I had no idea there might be some history or future event between the Church and this group.
I'm hoping that they will not be coming to Temple Square if this is the type of content they produce now days.

People just want to be loved, right?
People just want to be treated equal, right?
Lyrics
 

Is anyone still under the false impression that any of the COVID death rates given to us by the CDC are accurate?

Luigi Warren, currently the CEO and President of California-based biotech firm Cellular Reprogramming, and Derrick Rossi, co-founder of Moderna, are considered pioneers of mRNA technology.
Luigi Warren - Censored on Twitter for simply saying the following:

Why?

Pfizer’s former Chief Scientist Mike Yeadon - banned on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Instagram. Why?  (sorry don't know why the video is so huge).
34a97a8c3e6b42dc.mp4

Time and time again, any dissenting opinion of the jab is scrubbed off of the tech giant sites.  

This ^^^

The EUA use vs. full FDA approval, is only one factor among several reasons why I will continue to decline the vaccine(s).
If EUA is synonymous with full approval, then they should label them as full approval and remove this obstacle for many hesitant individuals.
If they are not synonymous, then we can't pretend that EUA products are just as good as fully approved products that have had longer follow up periods for efficacy.
Q: Anyone know if I got the jab today, how long would I be protected for?

In other news...
Should those in a low-risk demographic risk Covid or risk injecting themselves with these exported doses of J&J?
 
 

This, among other reasons, is why many of us won't take it. I naively already thought everyone knew they weren't approved by the FDA.  (Thanks Facebook, Twitter, Youtube for suppressing things.) This is the argument about being involved with the largest trial test ever conducted on humankind.

I know the family of this young man.  His grandfather attends the ward I grew up in, and we are good friends.  The family is truly devastated by this and would like answers.
https://www.wfla.com/community/health/coronavirus/13-year-old-dies-in-sleep-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine-cdc-investigating/
 

Ezra Taft Benson
And
 

The SFGMC and their buddies filed copyright claims to have them removed.
I grabbed a copy, but fair use doctrines govern here, so I won’t be making it available.  

The problem is that what "it's okay to be gay" means in our world and in theirs is VERY different. As is on par for the course for the gay "activists". They coop language and then twist it. And conservatives acquiesce to the language usage and then wonder why they lose the culture again and again. (Language isn't the only weapon used...but it's a huge one.) This is more of the same. They're both twisting "we're coming for your children" from the negative implication that most people mean to a "positive" one for a laugh (which is SO creepy), and concurrently twist the meaning of "love and tolerance" to mean what they say it should in the same breath. Because, who, after all, is going to argue against the idea of love and tolerance?! So they win the war of words by twisting meanings. And it's part of the way that they do, indeed, come for the children.
I mean the core catchphrase of the agenda is a lie of words. "Love is love". It's a lie. They're not talking about love. They're talking about sex. The phrase should be "Sex is sex". At least then it'd be honest.

Does the video cited in this thread represent your side's "tolerance without condoning" for our side's views?

They did the impermissible: They spoke their true feelings.

What statements did they say that were not true?

Shucks, no 'gay agenda' after all. My bad. I thought they were after my conservative kids.
Honestly, the fact they are trying to make light of what they are doing, doesn't negate what they are doing.

Nothing to see here folks...

I don't believe this. It was an honest message that they obviously sincerely meant couched in a modicum of humor so they had a "it's satire" escape route when they got the criticism they knew they'd get. But it was not satire. They said what they meant and they meant what they said. They want to convert everyone to their idea of what love and tolerance is. That's what the lyrics said. And they mean it. 

Well, obviously it's satire. That doesn't change the nature of the singing. It's a huge F-U to anyone who doesn't support homosexuality as a valid lifestyle choice.
Remember, these are the people the Church happily hosted on Temple Square. Building bridges and all that, you know. Now we see the bridges they're interested in building. Surprise! (Not.)

Shucks, no 'gay agenda' after all. My bad. I thought they were after my conservative kids.
Honestly, the fact they are trying to make light of what they are doing, doesn't negate what they are doing.

Nothing to see here folks...