Bini

The admin are more concerned with the safety of our members than hurting the feelings of a registered SO. That said, it was decided to ban him. We won't be conducting screenings/background checks but if information is provided, we have chosen to be on the safe side.

Yes. Registered. LP I think you're roght. Straight out ban would be kinder to him.

There's a difference between celebrating the death of an offender and celebrating the life of the survivor/s. Having a strong sense of relief - even a joyous one - that you can no longer be threatened or harmed by someone on death row is valid, in my opinion. I would think most people are able to tell the difference. That said, absolutely, there are many MANY that celebrate both. For many, this is un-Christian and not what God would want. But I think it should also be considered, that when a heavy tragedy hits, people in general aren't in the right mindset, you're hurt and angry - especially when you've lost loved ones. I think in most cases, there's grieving steps before people are able to come to terms with things. I know that if my 3 year old was taken from me, her life gone, instinctively I'd want that murderer's head.

I admin a selling/buying site along with two other people. Our latest contemplation between us is allowing sex offenders to join or remain as members if known. We had a lady send us information on a man verifying he's a SO and one of our admins (the owner) wants to ban him. Her concern is that he's going to people's homes to pickup items, which could pose a danger, as a large part of our site encourages local pickup and our active member base is primarily stay at home women with children. The other admin is in agreement. I am too. But I'm wondering if I should suggest that we make a public announcement to the forum so people know he's a SO and then they can makeup their own mind? This could allow him to participate. Anyone have any other ideas? Our priority is to keep members safe to the best of our ability.

I can see the reasoning but seems unnecessary.

Security? Like what? What's the security for the men?

That's fine, and again, there should be an opt-out for those opposed because as it stands (seemingly) it is what it is.

Was wondering what ever happened to him. Haven't kept tabs.

Prometheus Not sure I spelt that right but thought it was good. Had some intense and disturbing parts, though.

Again, parents should be able to opt out, just like some do for sex ed.

Religion is based on faith not evidence.

I think there should be an opt-out option for opposed parents. For myself, I think this course is a great way of bringing awareness to kids and teaching that there are different lifestyles out there, whether or not we agree, and that everyone should be treated as human beings. I know when I was in private school (British system) we were exposed to a handful of religions, as a course, and I was at the time LDS. Even though my family didn't agree with certain teachings or gospels, it made me aware of the different lifestyles and faiths others follow. For that I'm grateful to have a better understanding despite not subscribing to any faith. I'm definitely atheist.

Could be. I don't eat fast food so I'm probably just not accustom to what's decent in fast food.

Welcome!

If that's your family's preference, it is what it is, do what you feel comfortable with. Personally, I think some of your list isn't harmful, and that's my opinion. Good luck.

Backroads, it's so crazy! My first I wanted to show so bad but didn't really pop until about 20 weeks. Oh and the frequent peeing has hit. Sucks, ugh!

Everyone told me that my second pregnancy I'd show early. Boy, they weren't kidding. At 12 weeks I clearly had a baby bump but now at 15 weeks, holy cow, I look 6 months prego. What other second time around motherhood "joys" did you experience? What things were easier and what things were harder?

Oh goodness! I've missed your posts, too, Soulsearcher!

Oh how I've missed reading your posts, Godless! LIKE.

Meh. Sure men get the short end of the stick on some things, but overall, women are still unequally treated by society. So I won't comment more on it. As for social media spreading crap, that's nothing new, and I agree that it just makes gossiping and bullying easier but that the two have always been society plagues - regardless.

Gone Girl. EXCELLENT. The initial going is a bit slow but the plot is really very good. It is graphic, both in the violence and sexuality department, but if you can stomach that - or fast forward or find a censored version - worth it.

Can't suggest anything but I got out of a crappy marriage and it was the BEST decision I'd ever done! Listen to your gut, get help.

It could all be word play but I would term it as finding a man good looking versus being attracted to him. Like I said, probably just word play, but the word "attract" to me implies I'm being lured into something. I can honestly say that since being married I have not been attracted to another man but can certainly pick out good looking ones. I got to meet Norman Reedus this year and he's a good looking man, but I'm not attracted to him in the sense that I'm lured in. So yeh, maybe word play here.

Where was this even implied? I am a huge supporter of the GLBT community, regardless, of if an individual wishes to be in a relationship or not.

Sure. Of course I believe same-sex relationships are necessary. For homosexuals to be able to commit their life and express their love for a partner, a relationship is needed, and therefore it is beneficial to society as society is made up of all kinds of relationship dynamics - including those in the GLBT arena.