JohnnyRudick

Don't I know that:o I think I have heard it all.Not

Not at all Brother Town. I grew up with a friend named Town.:)

Hummmmmm:mellow: Well, It could be that we are not told what laws are "written in" the "Dogs" heart and if this is so, then I believe you could be right:cool:

When I sign into most anything I try to use my real name and not hide behind a made up avatar. I feel it is my way of trying to be honest and willing to stand behind my questions and statements. Just me:cool:

Although the resurrected Lord did eat fish with his disciples. I am not sure he needed to do so for his own health or if He even wanted to necessarily. Will I desire a steak in my resurrected state? If so, How long would it take to shed away from this desire. If I smoked would I desire a spud or would I navigate to a state where that was all people did?

All this shows is that they are outside the law.\ They had no part in the fall but received the effects of the fall. Through the redemption of Christ all will be made alive in Christ even they which are not subject to the laws of redemption. Even the severely retarded or (impeded in some other way) human who cannot repent. Paul has much to say I believe on this subject I believe.

My belief has always been . . .Yes. They do.

You mean thay are not? And all this time I. . .

Um, Who did you say I should address this to?

Again, Where is that laugh button?

From what I understand the 1909 Reino-Valera Spanish Bible is a good translation of the Textus Receptus that the King James Bible is taken from (including other translations that also were taken from the TR. Sooooooooooooo, Us using the King James Bible and the 1909 Reino-Valera Spanish Bible workes out quite well other then just pragmatic reasons. I think:huh:

I think along these lines. The "Water" is a symbol; of the Spirit. The "Wine" is a symbol; of our Blood. Through the fall our bodily systems became corrupted and our circular system came to pumping blood. Jesus I believe was showing at the beginning of His mission what happened in the start of our history and at His Resurrection, - He changed the wine into water. Yeah, I know:mellow: The reasoning needs some work but - Just a thought along those lines:cool:

Then why even try "to gain understanding from them"?

Is this not what he tried to do to Jesus at the beginning of His earthly ministry? Matt. Chapter 4 Mark 1:13 Luke Chapter 4 And I guess you laugh at reported instances like John 13:37 and Acts 5:3. 1 Nephi 13:29 And after these plain and precious things were taken away it goeth forth unto all the nations of the Gentiles; and after it goeth forth unto all the nations of the Gentiles, yea, even across the many waters which thou hast seen with the Gentiles which have gone forth out of captivity, thou seest-- because of the many plain and precious things which have been taken out of the book, which were plain unto the understanding of the children of men, according to the plainness which is in the Lamb of God--because of these things which are taken away out of the gospel of the Lamb, an exceedingly great many do stumble, yea, insomuch that Satan hath great power over them. 1 Nephi 22:15 For behold, saith the prophet, the time cometh speedily that Satan shall have no more power over the hearts of the children of men; for the day soon cometh that all the proud and they who do wickedly shall be as stubble; and the day cometh that they must be burned.

I am not sure that was his question:confused:

Now that's a new one:rolleyes: Thanks:p

Good idea:cool: Thanks:D

Oh, and as I hinted at, These movies are already edited and ready to go. They have been showing them on Network stations for many years now, the older the better. Just pkg. them up and put them out on the market for people to buy or rent:)

Oh, I forgot to mention (guess I wasn't done:) ) We now have machines that can equal the poor editing that is put forth these days as "good enough". So now we can at least spare the human element.

Years ago when they use to do it "right", They while producing the movie would do alternate "takes". One for the theater and one for network TV. They do not do that any more as standards have become so lax to where it seems to be alright to just edit out the so called offending part. I assume it is now to costly to do alternate takes. Yes, If a person is payed to sit and edit out these movies I take it it is his or her job and perhaps cares less for the morality of it all as much as the paycheck. Unless there is a volunteer group doing the editing then I do see the crime in that. No, in most cases I will not get to see the new movie but it is really no loss to me. They see it as an "art work" and blasphemy to alter it in any way. Yet I see they do just that to put in alternate endings, etc. I guess when it suits them. . . Done "venting" for now:cool:

I got me a player some years ago that did just that:o It was ajustable to how much of the offending piece you could cut out. from just taking out the small part of offending matter which every one could guess what was being said or done in their heads to taking out the whole chapter. It did not work very well in my world:cool:

Years ago in the mid or early 90's I wrote quite a few letters to various wigs at some of the big name movie company's and asked them if they could use the edited movies used by some of the networks and market them as edited DVD's. At that time they were doing a whole lot better job at editing then the sloppy jobs they do in this day. I cannot forget back in about 1986 how shocked I was when my daughter brought home a movie for us and some guests to watch and the situations and words that started to pour forth from our newly acquired VHS machine. I had no idea that movies were made like that. I had seen this same movie on TV and it was if it were an entirely different movie. Today they edit very little and there is not alternate situation inserted into the noxious one. Back then they would insert alternate language and scenarios into these places. There is little effort today. They may make a silence in the offending spot and it is not hard for the mind to fill in the offending language. I explained to the producers and others how large a market for DVD's is out there as many do not buy the existing ones but if there were legitimate copies of the same movie that was produced the way the movie should have been produced in the first place they could not help but expand their business and profits. But guess what? Many of them it seems are not as intent of earning money as they are in educating.

I do not believe anyone here believes that Obama is the Anti-Christ. Some of us just do not believe he is what he is passing himself off as. And this is on several levels. Now back to our movie:)

OK, but- - I like it:) Would most likely live there:D

I don't know:rolleyes: I have talked to many in and outside (mostly outside:mellow:" who truly do mean "profits":p