UtahTexan
-
Posts
80 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by UtahTexan
-
-
-
I am also an actual Texan. Further, I am an actual Texas attorney.
As to Wilson and Adler, never lost a trial to anyone in either firm. And I rarely trust attorneys who call themselves names...lol.
They are both decent attorneys, though. Not sure if Bailey & Galyen still do that kind of law, but they are an awesome firm...(I used to be a managing attorney there....)
There. You have three possibilities, depending on if any of the three do that kind of law. I am not certain. If you need more info, let me know.
-
6 minutes ago, MormonGator said:
Very cool! I'm certain they are all busy. Do they have a staff to assist them? Again, not an insult to you or them. Just a question.
No clue. I am not taking your posts as insults.
-
4 minutes ago, MormonGator said:
Oh wow, I never knew that! If I say "I liked and admired Robert Hales speech at General Conference" on my blog, he'll somehow get that information?
I am NOT challenging you, just surprised. I think it's cool!Not sure ALL the Apostles do that...but I know some do. So, since I learned that, I have tried very hard to be respectful and limit the times I mention them.
-
Iggy, I happened to know that when an Apostle's full name is used on the net, they get advised a post or something is written about them. I was trying to be respectful and limit the notices.
-
4 hours ago, prisonchaplain said:
So, thanks to you, I have listened to my first conference talk. It would be helpful to hear about interpersonal struggles you may have had with family and colleagues, as you made your return. Of course, only share that which is comfortable for you. Many thanks.
I will do that tonight after work......if you have any other points you wish me to address, let me know.
-
3 hours ago, zil said:
Yeah, just finished listening to President Uchtdorf's talk. Thanks, @UtahTexan, for sharing!
You are most welcome. It was odd hearing my story like that. But I feel humbled and blessed
-
Last night, Elder U gave a talk during the Priesthood session. He discussed a person named "David". Well, if you heard that, you heard about my conversion story. I am the "David" he was talking about. He told my story (with my permission, of course)
- Anddenex, zil, prisonchaplain and 2 others
- 5
-
-
On 8/31/2016 at 9:58 AM, Amym73 said:
After a decade being inactive and losing all my books and study materials in a flood I'm not sure with where to start now. ?
Of course I have gotten in touch with my local ward since I've moved and they are looking for my records, but, in the meantime is there a good place to start when you don't have anything to read or know a single soul in your area?
I'm sure I've forgotten heaps since I converted 13 years ago and of course am out of the loop because I have been inactive for so long. Of course not going inactive would have been the best course but due to past circumstances...Well it is, what it is.. I feel like it's akin to starting over at this point. I'm just not sure where to start today any advice would be very welcome.
I left the Church for 26 years. I came back last year. Just do it a step at a time. Stick with the basics. Ask for support....pray...study....attend.
-
8 hours ago, mickydo said:
hello people,
I am studying Mormonism. My background is Catholic and then charismatic for a little while.
I read something somewhere about Mormons believing the bible was "revered" but was corrupted by monks.
This idea about the bible was part of a list of things that I think had something to do with wisdom? I cant find this list of like ten things now. It was a Mormon list not a internet thing.
What I want to get at is what role does the bible play in the practical life of a Mormon.
What are the corrupted parts of the bible that should be avoided according to Mormonism?
Did Joseph Smith say the bible was corrupt?
If so where does He say that in His writings?
Thanks a bunch
Mike
Welcome. I, too, am a former Catholic. I was a Eucharist Minister, Lector, and a 4th Degree Knight.
We believe the Bible is not totally accurate. That should not be a surprise. It was translated and passed down a plethora of times throughout the centuries.
And the lack of a prophet has not helped. Without a prophet, the Bible is up for interpretation, hence the thousands and thousands of denominations....all teaching something different using the same Bible.
As a former Catholic, feel free to ask me anything.
-
I wear a 3-piece suit as an attorney for clients and court. I figure God deserves the same respect. So, I wear a 3-piece to Church, too. I am not a fan of suits, and I hate ties...but I do so out of respect.....
-
Here is what I think: ok. Next?
-
-
7 hours ago, Zarahemla said:
Getting to the Celestial Kingdom, Exaltation, the 2nd Coming, Resurrection. Being a family together forever in heaven. Returning to live with Heavenly Father again. I could go on.
that is all one thing......one occurance. Again, who judges is kinda silly to worry about.
-
29 minutes ago, Zarahemla said:
We are a church that focuses so much on what hasn't happened yet though.
Are we?
Like what?
-
On 8/23/2016 at 10:52 PM, Zarahemla said:
I wish we just dealt with Heavenly Father and Jesus in a private manner bit so many things say others will be there. One thing is our life review will be shown to all beings around and they get to see our many embarrassing mistakes in life. Moroni promised he'd be there and Brigham Young said we will all need to get Joseph Smith's approval to enter the Celestial Kingdom. Who else is going to invade this party? I wish it was just an intimate experience between the Father the Son and you.
This goes under the category "I will Cross that Bridge When I Get to It." I do not see the purpose or value of worrying about it now. If I do what I am supposed to do, it does not matter who it is
-
I left the Church i n 1989.....came back in 2015. I had to have a church court, get rebaptized and then wait a year.
All I can say is: going back to the Temple for the first time was amazing.
- Blackmarch and Edspringer
- 2
-
9 minutes ago, zil said:
I think the whole point of this thread has been that it's not doctrine. (Well, that and teasing some people.)
Perhaps.
I know it was a big deal when I was Catholic. IF you took it in the hand, it was supposed to the right. I always took it on my tongue
-
15 minutes ago, MormonGator said:
Great point. Really great point actually. You'd think if it was that important they'd ask you about it for a temple recommend.
-
can someone show me official doctrine about required hand for taking the Sacrament? I have never been asked that in a worthiness interview
-
Being left-handed, I typically take with my left hand.
I have noticed it does not become less symbolic when I do so
-
I worship the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I honor the prophets, past and present.
I admire the members.
-
I am very happy with one wife.
In college, I was male stripper. I had more sex than I will ever admit to. Trust me...more partners do not bring happiness.
Lawyers in Texas?
in General Discussion
Posted
what do an attorney and a sperm have in common? They both have a million-to-one chance of being human some day