Moksha Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 According to Al Gore we only have 6yrs left before we burn up... Again? Thought this happened in 1891. Anyway, no need to fear with 2012 right around the corner.:) Quote
Just_A_Guy Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 Again? Thought this happened in 1891.If you're alluding to the standard anti-Mormon interpretation of D&C 130:15, you're off by a year. Quote
Palerider Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 Again? Thought this happened in 1891. Anyway, no need to fear with 2012 right around the corner.:) no no...good ole Al Gore mentioned that about 4yrs ago....the countdown has been on since then...6yrs left and counting.... Quote
JudoMinja Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 Anyway, no need to fear with 2012 right around the corner.:)Lol. Hurray for the Mayan calendar! Quote
Moksha Posted December 10, 2009 Report Posted December 10, 2009 From Norway News:08.12.2009, 08:57am, Tue. GMT]The average temperature in Norway has never been higher than it has been over the last 9 years. Registrations have been made across the nation, both at the coast in and the highlands. This is shown by registrations made at 10 points by the Norwegian Meteorological Institute (NMI) since the year 2000. While the average temperature on the mainland has increased by from 1.0 to 1.5 degrees above the normal, on the Svalbard archipelago the temperature has risen 3 degrees above the normal Quote
Hemidakota Posted December 10, 2009 Report Posted December 10, 2009 I have, Hemi. Please quote specifics.Hmm...D&C 76 [most important since both Joseph and Sidney spent more than an hour in Johnson house viewing the wall], D&C 88, Book of Abraham [deciphering the second facsimile], Teachings of Joseph Smith, and Journal of Discourses where Brigham Young spoke on occasions concerning the Sun is a telestial state. Quote
Hemidakota Posted December 10, 2009 Report Posted December 10, 2009 Again? Thought this happened in 1891. Anyway, no need to fear with 2012 right around the corner.:)What? When the Spirit begins it withdraw from humanity in 2012? Quote
Hemidakota Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 · Hidden Hidden So? Now what was the point again?
Maxel Posted December 10, 2009 Report Posted December 10, 2009 What? When the Spirit begins it withdraw from humanity in 2012? Is that what you think will happen? The Spirit of God will beging ceasing to strive with humanity in the year 2012 (like with the Nephites)?(Not being contrary; trying to understand your position.) Quote
Hemidakota Posted December 10, 2009 Report Posted December 10, 2009 Joking here...sorry. I have my moments when Moksha would post some humor. It does lightened the day when a member passes bad info to others. Quote
FunkyTown Posted December 11, 2009 Report Posted December 11, 2009 Ooh, now that's an interesting interpretation of D&C 76 Hemi.For those who might not know, I would assume that he's referring to:70 These are they whose bodies are celestial, whose glory is that of the sun, even the glory of God, the highest of all, whose glory the sun of the firmament is written of as being typical.Are you suggesting that this means that the earth will become, when it is celestial, a fiery ball of gas? Not to be absurdist. I honestly don't know if that's what you mean, since I always took it to be largely symbolic.Hmm... I could see the correlations: A celestial world being one a terrestrial being couldn't live upon, the suggestion of its glory being like the sun. If this is what you're saying, I'd have to look further in to this and be cautious as I feel we're going in to pseudo-doctrine now.Hmm...D&C 76 [most important since both Joseph and Sidney spent more than an hour in Johnson house viewing the wall], D&C 88, Book of Abraham [deciphering the second facsimile], Teachings of Joseph Smith, and Journal of Discourses where Brigham Young spoke on occasions concerning the Sun is a telestial state. Quote
Winnie G Posted December 12, 2009 Report Posted December 12, 2009 If global warming is a fraud then why do I have seven foot snow drifts in my yard for a place that has a history of no to little snow? We moved here for that reason. Mild winter's!!!!! It was -38 C here two days ago. I dont need Scientists to tell me global warming is happening I have be watching Canada weather change so wildly I dont need to have them tell me. Quote
Snow Posted December 12, 2009 Report Posted December 12, 2009 If global warming is a fraud then why do I have seven foot snow drifts in my yard for a place that has a history of no to little snow? We moved here for that reason.Mild winter's!!!!! It was -38 C here two days ago. I dont need Scientists to tell me global warming is happening I have be watching Canada weather change so wildly I dont need to have them tell me.Have you ever asked yourself what 'global warming' means Winnie?It means getting warmer - not snowing in your yard. Quote
rameumptom Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Posted December 14, 2009 Is there climate change? Of course. The problem is, we do not know if man is causing it, or causing any portion of it; or if there's anything we can do about it. Much of the drastic and crazy weather in North America going on right now is due to the current El Nino. This is NOT a man-made condition, and nothing we can do about it. Quote
ozzy Posted December 14, 2009 Report Posted December 14, 2009 Hmmm, as I said in a different thingy, I wouldn't go so far as to say that global warming isn't real. However I would definitely say that the proclaimed cause of CO2 emissions is mostly false. It probably plays a part, but not nearly enough of one to raise the temp even a significant fraction of whatever we consider the base temp to be. Anyway, something I found rather funny was the whole deal about the 'carbon footprint' and reducing energy to reduce our 'carbon footprint' And in the midst of it all, our famed Nobel Peace Prize winner is using an electric lift to express how high the CO2 emissions are. By the way, why does he get a Nobel Peace Prize? Wouldn't it be a Nobel Contention Prize? I mean, thats really all its caused or done for the world is cause a whole big ball of argument. Quote
JohnnyRudick Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 Ooh, now that's an interesting interpretation of D&C 76 Hemi.For those who might not know, I would assume that he's referring to:Are you suggesting that this means that the earth will become, when it is celestial, a fiery ball of gas? Not to be absurdist. I honestly don't know if that's what you mean, since I always took it to be largely symbolic.Hmm... I could see the correlations: A celestial world being one a terrestrial being couldn't live upon, the suggestion of its glory being like the sun. If this is what you're saying, I'd have to look further in to this and be cautious as I feel we're going in to pseudo-doctrine now.Not if you take into considerations some of the musings of Brigham Young.Bro. Rudick Quote
FunkyTown Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 Not if you take into considerations some of the musings of Brigham Young.Bro. RudickThat's entirely possible, Johnny. The truth is, I don't know. I'm wary of taking musings as gospel, though, because in the early days of the church(Not that we aren't still in the early days!), there was much speculation based upon what we had learned that turned out to not be correct.This, however, is soundly based upon scripture. I'll have to mull it over. I wouldn't teach it in class, but it very well may be correct. It certainly fits. Quote
Gatorman Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 I haven't read the WHOLE thread, but, would perhaps a more accurate statement be 'Human Caused Global Warming a Hoax'? Quote
rameumptom Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Posted December 15, 2009 The UK's Daily Mail gave this article a couple days ago, showing one way in which the Global Warming folks were "cooking the books." (see link below: warning, some of their ads on the right column may be risque).SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: Climate change emails row deepens - and Russians admit they DID send them | Mail OnlineIn essence, they use data from several sources up to 1961, then drop tree chronology evidence from the data, by "hiding" it behind other lines that converge. In reality, it no longer appears, because they removed the data. The tree chronology data shows that temperatures dropped in that time period.Also, our temperature now is about the same as it was in 1000 AD, BEFORE industrialization, etc.This is just one bit of "inconvenient truth" that Al Gore didn't want us to see, I guess. Quote
JohnnyRudick Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 (edited) That's entirely possible, Johnny. The truth is, I don't know. I'm wary of taking musings as gospel, though, because in the early days of the church(Not that we aren't still in the early days!), there was much speculation based upon what we had learned that turned out to not be correct.This, however, is soundly based upon scripture. I'll have to mull it over. I wouldn't teach it in class, but it very well may be correct. It certainly fits.That is exactly the way I feel about it too.His statements on this subject came to mind when I read some of these posts and I just could not keep from mentioning it.Bro. Rudick Edited December 15, 2009 by JohnnyRudick Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.