Matthew0059 Posted August 3, 2010 Report Posted August 3, 2010 I think the church, itself, could have handled the whole situation more tactfully (and the church lobbyist who I talk to quite often agrees with me), but I think the gay community could have handled the backlash more tactfully as well.Church lobbyist? Quote
Just_A_Guy Posted August 3, 2010 Report Posted August 3, 2010 ... I thought it was pretty proven that 60-75% of the funds donated to Yes on 8 came from members of the church.Isn't the proof in the film? If not I might have to find those stats...Perhaps so; I was objecting to the implication that the money was funneled directly through the church via the church's standard donation slips.That's just plain balderdash.I think the church, itself, could have handled the whole situation more tactfully (and the church lobbyist who I talk to quite often agrees with me), but I think the gay community could have handled the backlash more tactfully as well.Amen, amen, and amen.I'll respond to your excellent points regarding Perez later. Quote
Soulsearcher Posted August 3, 2010 Report Posted August 3, 2010 Church lobbyist?People really think the church doesn't have political power players paid to help them achieve their goals? Quote
Moksha Posted August 3, 2010 Report Posted August 3, 2010 I disagree, have you seen the film? This money went directly for the fight against prop 8. While the Church may be in a unique position of asking members to contribute and the members actually delivering, for the purposes of tallying the numbers, individual Mormon donations cannot be counted as Church donations.So while LDS members may have contributed 40 million dollars, that in no way can be viewed as Church contributions. Quote
Moksha Posted August 3, 2010 Report Posted August 3, 2010 Personally, I think that huge political campaign contribution on the part of individual members would have been better off being rendered unto God rather than ending up in the pockets of Caesar and Mammon. Quote
Wingnut Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 Isn't the proof in the film?Of course not! It's in the pudding.Duh. Quote
Dravin Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 Of course not! It's in the pudding.Duh.So what you are saying is we should ask Bill Cosby? Quote
Matthew0059 Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 People really think the church doesn't have political power players paid to help them achieve their goals?I'd like more information on this so-called 'lobbyist'. Quote
Matthew0059 Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 So called in which way?"So-called" as in "that's what GaySaint called him/her". Quote
Soulsearcher Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 And we have reason to doubt it because...........? Quote
Matthew0059 Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 And we have reason to doubt it because...........?I don't know. I've never heard of the Church having lobbyists. Hence the reason I'm asking for more information.I don't doubt so much as wonder if GaySaint applied a title that didn't exactly "fit the bill", so to speak. Quote
Matthew0059 Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 Well, I stand informed. Thanks for the information, Soulsearcher. Quote
GaySaint Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 Matthew: The church has an entire Public Relations department which employes multiple lobbyists to ensure the church's point of view is defended legally. When the church initially filed its "in kind" contributions (totalling somewhere around 2000 dollars) it claimed the money was for hotel accomidations and food for their prop 8 lobbyist (which is the one I'm talking about - the one directly involved in prop 8. PM me if you want his name, as I promised him I wouldn't announce it publicly) who was sent to California multiple times. I don't see anything wrong with the church having a public relations office, or ensuring that the desires of the religious community are represented before legislative bodies. Quote
astral Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 (edited) California gears up for ruling on same-sex marriageCalifornia gears up for ruling on same-sex marriage - CNN.com Edited August 4, 2010 by astral Quote
FunkyTown Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 California gears up for ruling on same-sex marriagehttp://www.lds.net/forums/general-discussion/33777-8-mormon-proposition-7.htmlAstral? You linked to this page. You have created a mobius strip. That requires congratulations. Quote
Just_A_Guy Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 Drudge is reporting that a federal court struck down Prop 8 as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution.I'm going to guess that the 9th Circuit will affirm, which will force SCOTUS to take up the issue.This is going to be fun.Edit: CNN reports. Quote
GaySaint Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 There is a copy of the full ruling here: Prop 8 Ruling FINAL Quote
Wingnut Posted August 4, 2010 Report Posted August 4, 2010 Church Statement on Proposition 8 Ruling - LDS Newsroom Quote
Spencer Posted August 4, 2010 Author Report Posted August 4, 2010 Church Statement on Proposition 8 Ruling - LDS NewsroomA statement full of love indeed. Quote
Moksha Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 Seems like some Judge understands that Equal Protection Clause in the Constitution. Who would've thought? Hopefully this does not lead to another even more costly round of donations, telephone banks, pamphlets, full moons, book burnings, torch-bearing villagers storming the castle, wild hounds on the moors and door-to-door campaigning. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.